On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 05:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Powertop, maybe it ought to be a feature request for F27, and see if a
>> bunch of bug reports happen during the beta *shrug*. I've used it on
>> an ancient and new laptop, of different manufacture
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/110 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170406.n.0):
ID: 78136 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/78136
ID: 78163 Test: x86_64 universal upg
On 04/07/2017 05:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Powertop, maybe it ought to be a feature request for F27, and see if a
> bunch of bug reports happen during the beta *shrug*. I've used it on
> an ancient and new laptop, of different manufacture, and haven't had a
> problem. But of course if it puts e.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2017-04-10
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We have some active criteria / validation test proposals to discuss,
so that's a reason to have a mee
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> There's also tuned, another way to set lots of kernel bits. I think it
> was an accepted feature for a previous Fedora release, but it's off by
> default, and it is only mentioned in the Fedora 20 power saving guide,
> which seems to have disap
There's also tuned, another way to set lots of kernel bits. I think it
was an accepted feature for a previous Fedora release, but it's off by
default, and it is only mentioned in the Fedora 20 power saving guide,
which seems to have disappeared entirely for Fedora 21+:
https://docs.fedoraproject.o
01.org has several projects related to power management, but most
aren't in Fedora repositories. Are any of these useful for the recent
effort to make power management better on Fedora?
I've been compiling thermald from source for a while, and it does make
a difference to battery life and heat gen
Hi Silvia,
Very cool, the link to the project is https://github.com/bartkessels/getit
Feel free to give me feedback or send a pull request!
Kind regards,
Bart Kessels
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 15/109 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170406.n.0):
ID: 77816 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
>> > updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
>> > previous updates to all fut
Hi William,
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:43:00PM -0600, William Moreno wrote:
> The icaro project have moved theirs documentation from publican o sphinx I
> am orphaning the icaro-theme.
this sounds like it would be a good idea to just retire it directly.
Kind regards
Till
___
You convinced me, that it would be good to have test cases to demonstrate how
nss/openssl/gnutls are behaving related to the distrust rules.
I setup the following page, wich provides multiple test cases, and intructions
how to test:
https://kuix.de/misc/test-distrust/
Kai
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:44:16AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There is a bit of a problem with that, though, and packages that
> > iterate quickly. 52.0-6 went stable on 2017-03-24. 52.0-7 went stable
> > on 2017-03-30. 52.0.
On 04/07/2017 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had firefo
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > > > I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no
On 04/07/2017 05:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:49:15PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this
other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges.
What would be the advantage of ostree-based flat
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for th
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:49:15PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> >Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this
> >other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges.
> What would be the advantage of ostree-based flatpak here?
Only changed files need to be a
On 04/07/2017 05:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
previous updates to all future updates would becom
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
> > updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
> > previous updates to all future updates would become a crazy out of
> > control matrix v
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for
> > firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
> > Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
>
> We ha
Your description was complete and convincing. That link you did provide is only
12.0MB !! it is really acceptable. Thank you
Fedora, Red Hat and RPM are really great!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the last installed version of software?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
> Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
updates and
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:43:14PM -, Farhad Mohammadi_Majd wrote:
> Hello, Fedora like openSUSE and Ubuntu provides only Firefox rapid
> release, I want to known why there is no firefox-esr in the
> repository?
The general answer to this question for _any_ software is: "Because no
one who is
Hello, Fedora like openSUSE and Ubuntu provides only Firefox rapid release, I
want to known why there is no firefox-esr in the repository?
In Fedora v25, the size of firefox package is 84MB !! and there is no Delta RPM
for it to reduce the size of up-dates, because it is rapid release, its
life
On Friday, April 07, 2017 13:45:48 Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Friday, April 07, 2017 13:34:42 Kai Engert wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 11:54 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 07, 2017 11:01:35 Kai Engert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > > > A
On Friday, April 07, 2017 13:34:42 Kai Engert wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 11:54 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > On Friday, April 07, 2017 11:01:35 Kai Engert wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > > Although we build libcurl against NSS now, it loads the same CA b
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 11:54 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Friday, April 07, 2017 11:01:35 Kai Engert wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > Although we build libcurl against NSS now, it loads the same CA bundle as
> > > if we built it against OpenSSL:
> > >
> > >
On Friday, April 07, 2017 11:01:35 Kai Engert wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Although we build libcurl against NSS now, it loads the same CA bundle as
> > if we built it against OpenSSL:
> >
> > /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
> >
> > So I doubt it could a
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> Although we build libcurl against NSS now, it loads the same CA bundle as
> if we built it against OpenSSL:
>
> /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
>
> So I doubt it could actually take advantage of those extra flags.
This file doesn't
On Thursday, April 06, 2017 18:39:26 Kai Engert wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 09:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 18:22 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
> > > I would like to make you aware that the certificate validation of
> > > openssl
> > > isn't
> > > as complete as in NSS.
33 matches
Mail list logo
