Re: how to handle source code from github

Hi, > > I'm afraid this will not work because (according to the GitHub > repo) this project has 0 release tags. Also the archive has been > created only 23 days ago. Isn't it too early to package a project > which has not yet ever been released upstream? I am also upstream. I have been using t

[Test-Announce] openQA test results for critpath updates now shown in Bodhi

Hi folks! I thought this was worth sending out an announcement about so as many packagers and testers as possible are aware of it. With the rollout of Bodhi 2.6.0 to production today, openQA test results for critpath updates now appear in the Bodhi webUI! Click the 'Automated Tests' tab on any cri

Re: how to handle source code from github

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > 23.04.2017 19:23 Christopher wrote: >> >> You can set the name of the file via the GitHub API when you download it. >> >> For jQuery (packaged as js-jquery), I use: >> https://github.com/jquery/jquery/archive/%{version}/jquery-%{version}

Re: how to handle source code from github

s probably something like: Version: %{oneUpCounter}-%{shortcommit} where oneUpCounter is incremented every time you update the package to a newer commit. An alternative might be date-based: Version: 20170424-%{shortcommit} I'm not sure which would be preferred in Fedora. Hopefully somebody

Re: how to handle source code from github

23.04.2017 19:23 Christopher wrote: > > You can set the name of the file via the GitHub API when you download it. > > For jQuery (packaged as js-jquery), I use: > https://github.com/jquery/jquery/archive/%{version}/jquery-%{version}.tar.gz > > This will work for any GitHub project which tag

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

24.04.2017 12:47 Milan Crha wrote: > [...] > I know I can do this for packages I maintain, but I though it would > make sense to think of it globally. Maybe? > > Bye, > Milan If I may drop my 2¢… this sounds good to me for large packages, for example LibreOffice, glibc and KDE which do it already

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2017-04-25 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us [

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

On 24 April 2017 at 20:37, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > These days, I think we divide langpacks (at least at the distro/glibc > level) by language rather than country. > > I have `langpacks-en` on my system, for example. > Yep .. "these days" glibc is one of the best anti examples about how to wri

Fedora 26-20170424.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 20/111 (x86_64), 4/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170423.n.0): ID: 85993 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/85993 ID: 86018

Fedora Rawhide-20170424.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 67/109 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170423.n.0): ID: 85780 Test: x86

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

On 04/24/2017 12:15 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 08:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> If we went this route, I'd love to see us attempt to solve this >> generically for all packages if at all possible. > Hi, > right, having this done transparently for the packagers woul

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 08:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > If we went this route, I'd love to see us attempt to solve this > generically for all packages if at all possible. Hi, right, having this done transparently for the packagers would be ideal. You only need to decide from which bu

Summary/Minutes from Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-04-21)

== #fesco: FESCO (2017-04-21) == Meeting started by jforbes at 16:00:16 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-04-21/fesco.2017-04-21-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init proc

Reviews Weekly

Start Date: 2017-04-17 10:08:02.237190 End Date: 2017-04-24 10:08:02.237190 Athos Ribeiro : 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 golang-github-cznic-b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter ht

Re: Fedora packager environment in a docker container

On 04/24/2017 08:47 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 04/24/2017 06:29 AM, Michal Minar wrote: >> Did anyone successfully set up his fedora packaging environment in a >> docker container? >> I didn't get past `kinit mimi...@fedoraproject.org >> ` in a container. It gi

fedpkg container-build labels error

Hi, I am building container using fedpkg and I am getting this error: FAILED: BuildError: Required LABELs haven't been found in Dockerfile: version (or Version).   0 free  0 open  0 done  1 failed But in Dockerfile I have ENV NAME=mongodb \ VERSION=0 \ RELEASE=1 \ ARCH=x86_64 LABEL

Re: Fedora packager environment in a docker container

On 04/24/2017 08:08 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Michal Minar wrote: Did anyone successfully set up his fedora packaging environment in a docker container? I didn't get past `kinit mimi...@fedoraproject.org` in a container. It gives me: Invalid UID in

Re: Fedora packager environment in a docker container

On 04/24/2017 06:29 AM, Michal Minar wrote: Did anyone successfully set up his fedora packaging environment in a docker container? I didn't get past `kinit mimi...@fedoraproject.org ` in a container. It gives me: Invalid UID in persistent keyring name while ge

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

On 04/24/2017 06:47 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > Hello, > I've got an idea and I'd like to know an opinion of a wider audience. > > Would it make sense to split translations from binary packages to > a noarch subpackage? > > For example libreoffice does that already, it even splits the languages

Re: Fedora packager environment in a docker container

Hi, On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Michal Minar wrote: > Did anyone successfully set up his fedora packaging environment in a > docker container? > I didn't get past `kinit mimi...@fedoraproject.org` in a container. It > gives me: > > Invalid UID in persistent keyring name while getting defau

Split translations to noarch packages?

Hello, I've got an idea and I'd like to know an opinion of a wider audience. Would it make sense to split translations from binary packages to a noarch subpackage? For example libreoffice does that already, it even splits the languages by country, which may or may not be applicable to oth

Fedora packager environment in a docker container

Did anyone successfully set up his fedora packaging environment in a docker container? I didn't get past `kinit mimi...@fedoraproject.org` in a container. It gives me: Invalid UID in persistent keyring name while getting default ccache I'd be very glad for any suggestion or advice. Until then, I'