On 30 April 2017 at 15:33, David Sommerseth wrote:
> Point us at some patches, git repos, .spec files, *whatever* which uses
> your approach so we can see and get experience on how to resolve it.
David I've already send few times URL to IPS source repo :)
Here it is one more time https://java.net
On 1 May 2017 at 09:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more effective, more safe, and more efficient to
> improve the existing support for doing "the right thing", rather than
> trying to outsmart a build and deployment system that is essentially
> outside your control? To encourage the
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-30 at 09:24 +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was trying to push an update to stable and received a mail with this
>> notification [1], anyone experienced a similar response recently,
>> seems the version comp
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 27 April 2017 at 11:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Charalampos Stratakis
>>> At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe.
>>> Pip shares its installation directory with dnf, can remove
>>>
On 30 April 2017 at 21:40, josef radinger wrote:
> we currently have a situation where users accidentally might delete
> data. The situation is a mess. mc 4.8.19-1 changed from curses to slang
> and now several keybindings are plain wrong for at least fedora 25 and
> maybe fedora 24, too.
Just re
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 18/116 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 88964 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 71/116 (x86_64), 20/23 (i386)
ID: 89293 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fed
Hi
Could someone with write-access to mc solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442842
we currently have a situation where users accidentally might delete
data. The situation is a mess. mc 4.8.19-1 changed from curses to slang
and now several keybindings are plain wrong for at leas
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 62/116 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386)
ID: 89112 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
# F26 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2017-05-01
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers! Last week was a busy week and we had 5 proposed
blockers for Beta and 6 proposed blockers for Final. If you have time
between now and Monday to go through th
On 29/04/17 20:31, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
>> As the saying goes: Talk is cheap!
> And this is what exactly I'm doing ..
And it is incredibly tiring with all your words. Lets try another
idiom: Don't talk the walk; walk the walk
Point us at some patches, git repos, .spec files, *whatever* whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
