Greetings testers! We don't have any proposed blockers for Beta or
Final right now, so I propose that we cancel tomorrows meeting.
If you find a blocker or want to discuss something, please reply to this
thread and we'll have the meeting!
Thanks!
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
___
On 14 May 2017 at 15:43, Simone Caronni wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Simone Caronni
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote:
So just wanted everyone to know that we now hav
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Simone Caronni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote:
>>
>>> So just wanted everyone to know that we now have the go ahead to ship
>>> mp3 encoding in Fedora too. So anyone
Hello,
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
wrote:
> On 2017-05-03 12:44, Christian Schaller wrote:
>
>> So just wanted everyone to know that we now have the go ahead to ship mp3
>> encoding in Fedora too. So anyone involved with packaging
>> mp3 encoders can now start migrating them
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote:
> Whoops yeah, I meant to include that. It's bug 1450590.
Here is a link, in case anyone wants to check it out:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590
> I ran the package review tool against my own bug and there are a few
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:47:29AM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote:
> Thanks for the welcome :)
>
> > It would be nice to provide a link to that review request. In the
> > meanwhile, you probably want to perform some package reviews [1] and
> > provide links for them in your review request.
>
> Whoops
Well, it's not my package but it's still broken in Rawhide so my
inclination is to disable building on s390x for now and follow up with the
maintainer.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
Thanks for the welcome :)
> It would be nice to provide a link to that review request. In the
> meanwhile, you probably want to perform some package reviews [1] and
> provide links for them in your review request.
Whoops yeah, I meant to include that. It's bug 1450590.
I ran the package review to
