Hi all,
python-greenlet was marked as dead.package for the epel7 branch because
it's in rhel-extras:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108884
however, it seems that it's only built for python 2. Is it fine if we bring
it back in EPEL but make it python3 only?
Thanks,
--
Michel
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
I think you're misunderstanding the discussion; the issue is not whether it's
okay to package the game at all - as noted by Matthew and Zbigniew, being able
to use copyrighted levels and such is okay; see: Fedora packs Doom ports.
The current blocker is that the level packs (CCLPs) use a licence
> (Game engines which are open source and which work with redistributable but
> non-free content are a different special case.)
Actually that's the case here, as explained in another post. It does *not
require* the non-FLOSS binaries.
___
devel mailing
FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Actually, BTW, one basic assumption you do is wrong: The game can be played
completely without the maybe-proprietary binary. There are FLOSS levels
inside/bundled IIRC.
Playing the original levels is just an "extra feature" and if you don't use it,
you don't use it.
Not allowing the software, b
On 06/23/2017 04:39 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> What reasons would there be for some old packages (one going back to 5th
> June) being stuck in f27-pending and not getting tagged into f27?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=427&order=-build_id&latest=1
>
>
> Seems not
