The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
853 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
615 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
197
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
731 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
725 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
615
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467123
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-PDF-API2-2.033-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468565
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-PDF-API2-2.033-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468399
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468854
Bug ID: 1468854
Summary: ctstream-27 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ctstream
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467123
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468565
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Yes, I got the same type of errors
you received, in addition to the:
> "bin/bash"open("/usr/share/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_
MESSAGES/libc.mo",O_RDONLY)
I listed previously.
It appears there is something quirky going on with locale, and apparently
this has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465413
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CBOR-XS-1.7-1.fc27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-REPL-1.003028-5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465418
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-L-1.0.0-1.fc27
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:45:38 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> Your onto something...I tried renaming the file on both the rescue
> image and then on the target system, and it didn't help..
> I did find when running the strace it returned with a bunch of no
> such file or directory as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465413
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CBOR-XS-1.7-1.fc27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465418
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-L-1.0.0-1.fc27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-REPL-1.003028-5.
dist.upgradepath PASSED for perl-L-1.0.0-1.fc25
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/0ae13268-636e-11e7-8dc8-5254008e42f6/task_output/perl-L-1.0.0-1.fc25.log
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
dist.upgradepath PASSED for perl-CBOR-XS-1.7-1.fc25
https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/0ae13268-636e-11e7-8dc8-5254008e42f6/task_output/perl-CBOR-XS-1.7-1.fc25.log
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 05:39:49PM -, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> IMHO, based on first impressions, new features aside. I don't like the
> interface responsiveness.
>
> If I compare it with cgit, cgit is reasonably fast with an nice overview.
> Browsing pages with packages with pagure is
From 0cf2f0abd9f170e4d6b49c0ad0ba20cb9b835963 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 21:57:07 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.27
- New upstream release 0.27
- Rename the test library "Parent.pm" to "Mother.pm" to avoid conflict with
core
0c23141ccc2041e8c1c222c95d6eab4b56e2d77a94c68507f67acbb62fa5132e9229e9680c9fff6ebbc6a47a42cf1943d6e5b50a5f0168c66193fb52aaa241f0
Data-Section-0.27.tar.gz
IMHO, based on first impressions, new features aside. I don't like the
interface responsiveness.
If I compare it with cgit, cgit is reasonably fast with an nice overview.
Browsing pages with packages with pagure is slower, browsing users pages is
unusable, it literally takes minutes to load a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'll be updating libgit2 stack to 0.26.x this weekend, there is only
one breaking change and looks like none from packages are affected.
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 24/137 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170707.n.2):
ID: 118743 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso
Hi all.
Has anyone ever obtained in a 'fedora-review' error like that reported
in bz ticket #1467048?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467048
07-02 11:20 root DEBUGBuild command: "mock" "-r"
"fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free" "--no-cleanup-after" "--no-clean"
7.7.2017 20.45 "Jason L Tibbitts III" kirjoitti:
I would argue that it doesn't remove the ability, but that it does make
it more difficult to do in an automated fashion. Basically you can see
that something has a bundled library but then you need to do manual
inspection to
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.01-2.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-2.01-2.fc26.noarch requires
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On aarch64:
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires
libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71-6.fc27.aarch64 requires
libplplot.so.13()(64bit)
perl-SDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-SDL-2.546-7.fc26.armv7hl requires libperl.so.5.24
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.24()(64bit)
perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-21.fc26.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-7.fc26.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-18.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On armhfp:
perl-HTML-FormFu-MultiForm-1.00-9.fc26.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1)
On ppc64le:
Hi,
On 07-07-17 16:43, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 08:14 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
We want to make the default installation do the right thing, as far
as
possible, on any system,
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Another problem is selecting the name for the provides. E.g. pick
> between bundled(ANGLE) or bundled(libangle). With the next evince
> update, evince will bundle a LZMA decoder. Should it be bundled(LZMA)
> or bundled(lzma-sdk) or bundled(7zip)? Some of these options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468829
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hotness's scratch build of perl-XML-Tidy-1.18-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20397808
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468829
Bug ID: 1468829
Summary: perl-XML-Tidy-1.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-Tidy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468829
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1295495
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1295495=edit
[patch] Update to 1.18 (#1468829)
--
You are
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Alternatively, say that you don't have to specify a version, but if
> you don't then you will get every related security bug filed against
> your package instead of having those filtered by version.
Perhaps with a notice included in each such bug report, along the
> Argument 4 is the "n".
Right, if I adapt the fix for 4th argument, that works.
> The problem is with the definition of "PRIo64. There was a recent commit
> attempting to fix that, but it probably needs some adjustment to handle your
> case. Check out the lines around line 48 in that file and
On 07/06/2017 02:28 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am 06.07.2017 um 10:14 schrieb Samuel Rakitničan:
src/cbang/tar/TarHeader.cpp:226:43: error: format '%llo' expects
argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type
'uint64_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Werror=format=]
43 matches
Mail list logo