Re: [Ambassadors] Re: Elections July/August 2017 to FESCo, Council, FAmSCo - Nomination period is now open

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis wrote: > Good night Jan, I have a little question, Should the candidates send you the > questionarie? Hi Alex, during the campaign period candidates will be asked to publish answers to questions in questionnaire as an article in Community

Re: libglvnd-egl needed for X: should it be in base-x comps group? Or should something require it?

> > Hi folks! Wanted to run this up the flagpole somewhere before I just > went and did it... > > We have a couple of openQA tests which just run Firefox on top of a > bare X server to do some browser tests. Up to now just 'dnf > groupinstall base-x' then 'dnf groupinstall firefox', then 'startx

Re: libglvnd-egl needed for X: should it be in base-x comps group? Or should something require it?

Adam Williamson wrote: > So, should this package be added to base-x ? Should something depend on > it? Should X actually start up without libEGL.so.1, and I should file > *that* as a bug? Thanks! I'd say add to base-x (at least). There may be places where adding an explicit dependency may make

libglvnd-egl needed for X: should it be in base-x comps group? Or should something require it?

Hi folks! Wanted to run this up the flagpole somewhere before I just went and did it... We have a couple of openQA tests which just run Firefox on top of a bare X server to do some browser tests. Up to now just 'dnf groupinstall base-x' then 'dnf groupinstall firefox', then 'startx /usr/bin/firefo

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> > wrote: >> > > 3. The

Elections July/August 2017 to FESCo, Council, FAmSCo - Nomination period is now open

Greetings, FESCo, Council and FAmSCo elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections If you are interested in these roles, please add yourself to the lists of nominees before 23:59:59 UTC on July 31st, 2017! If you wish to nominate someone else

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:49:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > >

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-07-25 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Work

Re: rpm debuginfo improvements for rawhide/f27

Hi packagers, On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:13:02PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > The second introduces two new macros to enable > separate debugsource and sub-debuginfo packages, but has not been > enabled by default yet. If people like the change and no bugs are found > (and fesco and releng agree)

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:23:35AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > 3. The default landing page for a package shows a message about > > >the m

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

El mar, 11-07-2017 a las 16:03 -0500, Justin Forbes escribió: > > The kernel team quit "supporting" i686 several releases ago, it is > down to community support, which is pretty much nonexistent. Sure, > people file bugs, but rarely do people point to or supply patches for > those bugs. The big

Fedora Rawhide-20170724.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 16/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170723.n.0): ID: 123796 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedorapro

Re: Rdkit issue with boost 1.64

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:> > Build with patch applied is running [1]. > > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20711140 Thanks a lot! -- Gianluca Sforna http://plus.google.com/+gianlucasforna - http://twitter.com/giallu Tinker Garage

Re: Blocker bug process proposal: waiving late-discovered blockers to next release

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > However, I think I misread your comment. I believed you're proposing we > reject bugs existing in stable releases as blockers at any point of the > development cycle. But you seem to have suggested we do this only if > they're discovere

Re: dnf cache downloading behavior

Dne 22.7.2017 v 23:26 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller >>> wrote: On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chri

Re: Rdkit issue with boost 1.64

Am 24.07.2017 um 12:14 schrieb Gianluca Sforna: Apparently, the rdkit package does not play along with boost 1.64 serialization library as you can see from: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20681707 This appears to be a known boost issue: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12

Re: RFD Unifying graphviz.spec with upstream

Dne 21.7.2017 v 00:24 David Sommerseth napsal(a): > On 20/07/17 12:47, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT), John Ellson wrote: >>> This works well for me, upstream, for building and testing across all >>> distributions, but perhaps the .spec file is less optimal w

Rdkit issue with boost 1.64

Apparently, the rdkit package does not play along with boost 1.64 serialization library as you can see from: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20681707 This appears to be a known boost issue: https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12516 with an upstream patch (that i assume will go

Re: Blocker bug process proposal: waiving late-discovered blockers to next release

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:02:09AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > But all of that above is a separate problem. What I'd like to understand > is > > why you think existing bugs should be treated differently from new bugs. > > What is the rati

Re: Skip tests with CTest

On 07/24/2017 10:28 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 24.07.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Antonio Trande: >> Hi all. >> >> How i can skip multiple tests with CTest? >> >> For example, i can skip tests matching regular expression with '-E' >> option but if regular expression is more than one? >> >> 'ct

Re: Skip tests with CTest

Am 24.07.2017 um 09:55 schrieb Antonio Trande: Hi all. How i can skip multiple tests with CTest? For example, i can skip tests matching regular expression with '-E' option but if regular expression is more than one? 'ctest -V -E Python' <--- works 'ctest -V -E Python Star' <--- does not wor

Skip tests with CTest

Hi all. How i can skip multiple tests with CTest? For example, i can skip tests matching regular expression with '-E' option but if regular expression is more than one? 'ctest -V -E Python' <--- works 'ctest -V -E Python Star' <--- does not work 'ctest -V -E Python -E Star' <--- does not wor