Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-17 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-08-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-08-17 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-08-17

[Bug 1482318] New: perl-Text-Diff-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482318 Bug ID: 1482318 Summary: perl-Text-Diff-1.45 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-Diff Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1482307] New: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9745 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482307 Bug ID: 1482307 Summary: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9745 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-HiRes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1482299] perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482299 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21269790

[Bug 1482299] perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482299 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1314504 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1314504=edit [patch] Update to 1.22 (#1482299) -- You are

[Bug 1482299] New: perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482299 Bug ID: 1482299 Summary: perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOAP-Lite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1482292] New: perl-Math-Derivative-1.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482292 Bug ID: 1482292 Summary: perl-Math-Derivative-1.01 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-Derivative Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1482291] New: perl-DBI-1.637 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482291 Bug ID: 1482291 Summary: perl-DBI-1.637 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: How to request new branch?

On 08/16/2017 04:19 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: >>> According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: >>> >>> $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 >>> >>> And the ticket [2] was closed with a

Fedora Rawhide-20170815.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 34/137 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130199 Test: i386 universal

Re: How to request new branch?

- Original Message - > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > > > > "The branch in PDC was created. You

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On 08/16/2017 04:34 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > On 08/09/2017 05:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently >> fails to link to atlas: >> >> + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I >> examples

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:57:28 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dave Love wrote: > > > Kevin Kofler writes: > >> If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: > >> Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > >> does wonders. > > > > I mean you need to get the soname right and

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

Dave Love wrote: > Kevin Kofler writes: >> If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: >> Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) >> does wonders. > > I mean you need to get the soname right and ensure that you have > everything implemented in the replacement library. Only the soname of the

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

On 08/09/2017 05:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently > fails to link to atlas: > > + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I > examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o

Re: f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hello, > > I just received the notification above and I'm very surprised. I > retired this package before f26 was branched because of > incompatibility with recent Varnish releases. > > The old pkgdb web page

Re: f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

Am 16.08.2017 um 21:36 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:46 PM Subject: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package To: dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com pkgdb created branch

f27 branch of retired package (was: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package)

-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:46 PM Subject: pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package To: dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com pkgdb created branch 'f27' for the 'rpms/varnish-agent' package

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017, Jan Kurik wrote: > I do not see the conflict of interests here. Justin is one of > volunteers (for several election cycles already) who contacts all > candidates at the beginning of Campaign period providing them with > instructions how to work with CommOps team to publish

[Bug 1481324] devel subpackage: dependencies correction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 --- Comment #20 from Tomasz Kłoczko --- (In reply to Jan Pazdziora from comment #19) > I haven't changed my opinion WRT the consistency and no bad surprises for > people who try to build modules. But of course, if

[EPEL-devel] EPSCO weekly meeting logs

I am working on getting these posted every week: == #fedora-meeting: EPEL (2017-08-16) == Meeting started by smooge at 18:01:21 UTC. The full logs are available

Re: git push fails for new packages

On 08/16/2017 11:18 AM, Martin Gansser wrote: > i still get the message koji not in list errors, some works... some doesn't > ... > > BuildError: package nuvola-app-mixcloud not in list for tag > f25-updates-candidate > BuildError: package nuvola-app-google-play-music not in list for tag >

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

Kevin Kofler writes: > Dave Love wrote: >> You'll find Dominik was correct if you try it. > > If you are talking about the missing RPM AutoProvides: > Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > does wonders. I mean you need to get the soname right and ensure that you have

Re: git push fails for new packages

i still get the message koji not in list errors, some works... some doesn't ... BuildError: package nuvola-app-mixcloud not in list for tag f25-updates-candidate BuildError: package nuvola-app-google-play-music not in list for tag f26-updates-candidate BuildError: package

Re: Need reviewer for golang based packages

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:46:26AM +0900, Tomofumi Hayashi wrote: > Hi all, Hello, > > I need reviewer who is good at golang rpm packages because its > reviewer asks me to have more reviewers who is good at golang rpm > packages in Fedora. > Could someone help review the following RPM

Need reviewer for golang based packages

Hi all, I need reviewer who is good at golang rpm packages because its reviewer asks me to have more reviewers who is good at golang rpm packages in Fedora. Could someone help review the following RPM packaging? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463492 Regards, Tomo

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 16 August 2017 at 13:02, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/16/2017 05:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> >> >> On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas opensou...@till.name>> wrote: >> >> Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik >>

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 08/16/2017 05:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas > wrote: Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik >: >I am personally not

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On 16 August 2017 at 05:44, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On 08/16/2017 11:37 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > > >> > >> So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? > >> The fact is that

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas wrote: > Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik : > > >I am personally not convinced this will help as the set of questions > >in Questionnaire is almost the same for the last several elections, as > >we

Re: mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

Dne 16.8.2017 v 14:48 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Sam Varshavchik > > wrote: > > On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL > 5, specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64)

ppisar pushed to perl-Time-HiRes (f26). "1.9745 bump"

From 1364f3af0989ded6df3e9eb02e26878159f5d9a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 16 2017 13:42:43 + Subject: 1.9745 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0f41acd..9435caf 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@

[389-devel] Review Request - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48056

Hello Everyone, I have uploaded a patch which includes doc strings for test cases in basic test suit [1]. Please review the same and share your feedback. Thanks & Regards, Amita [1]. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48056 ___ 389-devel mailing list

ppisar pushed to perl-Time-HiRes (master). "1.9745 bump"

From c814a379ce6c22a4f700e4218219d195a3ce6156 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 16 2017 13:40:01 + Subject: 1.9745 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 0f41acd..9435caf 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -11,3 +11,4 @@

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > On 08/16/2017 09:09 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> For reference there's a bunch of history on this bug about getting it >> up to date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316315 > > Thanks. I give lots of

ppisar uploaded Time-HiRes-1.9745.tar.gz for perl-Time-HiRes

fb495fe16e17b0a980ea2a683103140c5826baad423dece4a11cbcadfc4c138e4bbfda9ea08d2fc67feece8088b8c557e42f3f919eb0112b8e20aef2a2ca6bed Time-HiRes-1.9745.tar.gz

Re: How to request new branch?

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: > > $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 > > And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: > > "The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using >

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On 08/16/2017 09:09 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > For reference there's a bunch of history on this bug about getting it > up to date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316315 Thanks. I give lots of credit to Gianluca's work on the 1.6 branch, most of that was still applicable in the 1.8

Re: Arduino in Fedora

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not > being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora > were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them > and

Arduino in Fedora

In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them and put them in my copr here:

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 14:38 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] >> > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 14:38 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for

Re: mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL 5, > specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64) fails thusly: Well /etc/mock/site-defaults.cfg says this (wrongly I believe): # By

mock epel-5 target build fails on Fedora 26

On an up to date Fedora 26, attempting a mock build targeting EPEL 5, specifically "-r epel-5-x86_64" (on Fedora x86_64) fails thusly: DEBUG util.py:606: child environment: None DEBUG util.py:533: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn', '-q', '- M',

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:55:14PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > Yes, because it's a Fedora change. Not EPEL one. >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:35 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > > this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter > DEBUG util.py:450: Error: No Package found for

Re: F27 System Wide Change: perl Package to Install Core Modules

On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 14:35 +, Petr Pisar wrote: this change is breaking builds on EPEL7 [1] DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter DEBUG util.py:450:  Error: No Package found for perl-interpreter Any advice is welcome . Thanks, [1] 

[EPEL-devel] Nodejs dependencies

Hi, http-parser package has gone from the epel repository but nodejs packages still requires http-parser packages. Could you fix it? Thanks! -- Murtaza Sarıaltun Özgür Yazılım A.Ş.~$ www.ozguryazilim.com.tr ___ epel-devel mailing list --

jplesnik pushed to perl-Statistics-Descriptive (epel7). "Updated dependencies to build on EPEL 7"

From fd94666c240db5823b746edbc6a29e7549e7e0f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 16 2017 10:17:14 + Subject: Updated dependencies to build on EPEL 7 --- diff --git a/perl-Statistics-Descriptive.spec b/perl-Statistics-Descriptive.spec index

introducing fed-install: easy way to install packages from koji and other releases

Hello Fedora, for some time, I am using rawhide as my main system. I always struggled with installation of non-rawhide packages: installing stable kernel, downgrading to a non-broken package, reinstalling package which is no longer available in repositories... I thought that somebody had to

jplesnik pushed to perl-Statistics-Descriptive (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

From b62789e42db604a6ecbb199b5c8d958566c6d9e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 06:08:41 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Statistics-Descriptive.spec

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On 08/16/2017 11:37 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > >> >> So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? >> The fact is that we still do not have any other replacement except >> firewalls. But do we

Re: tcp_wrappers deprecation

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? > The fact is that we still do not have any other replacement except > firewalls. But do we need one? > IIRC, in the past discussion there was quite

[Bug 1470542] PAR:: Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PAR-Packer-1.035-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8cfb07cd7a -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1470542] PAR:: Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PAR-Packer-1.036-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f9c0cc106f -- You are receiving this

ppisar pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (f25). "Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2"

From c2958949842ef51ac17bfb3d02577d2e1574e5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 16 2017 08:34:08 + Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2 --- diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec index 715e4b8..edf7f9f 100644 --- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec

ppisar pushed to perl-PAR-Packer (f26). "Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2"

From 832b68e11ad52a79bb6956f44649863267d281a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 16 2017 08:32:03 + Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.2 --- diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec index 1f2c4ac..7d8e82e 100644 --- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec

[Bug 1470542] PAR:: Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542 --- Comment #16 from Petr Pisar --- Fedora build infrastructure does not support automatic rebuilds. We have to rebuild it manually. With the perl(:VERSION) dependency we at least know before installing it. -- You are

[Bug 1470542] PAR:: Packer requires the same perl version it was built against

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542 --- Comment #15 from Johan Vromans --- Perl has been updated to 5.24.2, and history repeats... rpm --requires -qp ~/tmp/perl-PAR-Packer-1.035-3.fc25.x86_64.rpm ... perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) perl(:VERSION) = 5.24.1 ...

[Bug 1481324] devel subpackage: dependencies correction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 --- Comment #19 from Jan Pazdziora --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #18) > > > I guess it makes sense under the consistency umbrella to remove the Requires > > form perl-devel as well. > > The implication is

[Bug 1481324] devel subpackage: dependencies correction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik : >I am personally not convinced this will help as the set of questions >in Questionnaire is almost the same for the last several elections, as >we copy them from one elections to another. So, candidates can prepare >them self

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

Am 15. August 2017 16:55:02 MESZ schrieb Ben Rosser : >I would go so far as to say answering the questionnaire, or at least >giving >a brief statement about your goals for the position, should be a >*requirement* for running for an elected position in the project. Hi Ben, I

[Bug 1481745] perl-Test-Spec-0.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481745 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Test-Spec (master). "0.52 bump"

From 6cf3b648a27d0639c91fc6600fba276d3c03190b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 16 2017 07:20:24 + Subject: 0.52 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 5de7496..d8f14d0 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -15,3 +15,4 @@

jplesnik uploaded Test-Spec-0.52.tar.gz for perl-Test-Spec

1fff7e5437d7bb5943d20623e70f1328143d2b4e4c542ba3bd9f4058cc6c45b56bd7a48797adc2188422362f659b39d1f815098bf626c3088685d5c9cfa11e36 Test-Spec-0.52.tar.gz

Re: Council Elections - July/August 2017 - Result announcement

Am 16. August 2017 02:01:09 MESZ schrieb Kevin Kofler : >Jan Kurik wrote: >> It was the one sent to you by Justin with subject "[Fedora elections] >> ausil: Your Council interview template". > >Wait, are we talking about the same Justin there? I.e., was one of the