Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 22/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171114.n.1):
ID: 170546 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170546
ID
Hello all,
On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered
Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came
out today[2].
At this time the following Container Images are available in the
Fedora Regis
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171114.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 3
Size of added packages: 470.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages
grub2-tools does not belong to a distupgrade repository, causes
software-upgrade failure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491624
I've found at least three bug reports, each with some grub2 component
that has a problem with grub2-tools when doing F26 to F27 'dnf
system-upgrade download'
Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
>> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
>> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
>> review, I would like to ask anyone who is interested
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
> review, I w
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 10:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> > last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> > The outcome is
On 11/14/2017 10:50 PM, Christopher wrote:
> I believe that 'fedpkg local' will use ~/.m2/repository (or wherever your
> local maven repository is located) to resolve previously downloaded
> dependencies, even with xmvn using offline mode. That may result in a
> different build experience. Try usin
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:52 PM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade <
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-11-14 11:30 GMT-05:00 Mikolaj Izdebski :
> > On 11/14/2017 02:58 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> If you have a spare time, and can do a quick t
Hi,
On 14/11/17 19:20, Laura Abbott wrote:
The kernel has seen an uptick in testing from fuzzers lately. This
has been great for the kernel as its exposed a number of bugs. See
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html
as an example. Part of this
The kernel has seen an uptick in testing from fuzzers lately. This
has been great for the kernel as its exposed a number of bugs. See
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html
as an example. Part of this has also shown what areas of the kernel
are under
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
> review, I w
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Docker_base docker x86_64
Server dvd arm
Failed openQA tests: 22/94 (x86_64), 7/19 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171114.n.0):
ID: 170336 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170336
ID
2017-11-14 11:30 GMT-05:00 Mikolaj Izdebski :
> On 11/14/2017 02:58 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you have a spare time, and can do a quick test I would really
>> appreciate.
>>
>> I only know some basic heuristics based on build errors...
>>
>> Test should be:
>
On 11/14/2017 02:58 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have a spare time, and can do a quick test I would really
> appreciate.
>
> I only know some basic heuristics based on build errors...
>
> Test should be:
>
> $ fedpkg co jacop; cd jacop; fedpkg local
>
>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:58:19PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> The mismatch in the numbering here feels inherently confusing to me.
>
> How about if the numbers were aligned, and then the first Beta target date
> was called something like "Preferred Beta Target" or "Beta Target 0"?
>
> That woul
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 27/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171113.n.0):
ID: 170164 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two
weeks)
=
Meeting started by nils at 15:00:33 UTC.
Minutes:
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171114.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171114.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages
W dniu 14.11.2017 o 14:43 Matthew Miller pisze:
>
> Fedora 27 is here! Thanks and congratulations to all of the
> people in the Fedora community who worked so hard to bring
> this together.
Congratulations to everyone who made this possible from the snapd team!
We will work on improving the exper
Am Dienstag, den 14.11.2017, 08:43 -0500 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> Fedora 27 is here! Thanks and congratulations to all of the
> people in the Fedora community who worked so hard to bring
> this together.
Yay!
When will the docker images get released on dockerhub?
signature.asc
Description: Thi
Fedora 27 is here! Thanks and congratulations to all of the
people in the Fedora community who worked so hard to bring
this together.
Read the official announcement at:
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-27/
or just go ahead and grab it from:
* https://getfedora.org/
We're also re
Hi,
If you have a spare time, and can do a quick test I would really
appreciate.
I only know some basic heuristics based on build errors...
Test should be:
$ fedpkg co jacop; cd jacop; fedpkg local
I thought it could be related to scala, but it fails with either current
scala, or a r
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:48:07AM -0500, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> 2017-11-13 10:53 GMT-05:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> > On 11/13/2017 01:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> It looks as if the texlive saga continues!
> >>
> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23085154
> >
2017-11-13 10:53 GMT-05:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> On 11/13/2017 01:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> It looks as if the texlive saga continues!
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23085154
>>
>> Started yesterday evening and still going 15 hours later.
>> It has picked an armv7 hos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 07:14 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 11/14/2017 12:50 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > Then something isn't working correctly, because then libcomps builds
> > > shoul
Dne 14.11.2017 v 12:49 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
>
> - rubygem-apipie-rails (rubygem-apipie-rails)
This should be fixed now. I dropped the file responsible for the
require, since it appears to be dead code anyway ...
Vít
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 12:50 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> Then something isn't working correctly, because then libcomps builds
>> should be failing in Fedora. It doesn't. It fails in *every other
>> Linux distribution* that I've built it for (Mageia,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
>
> This looks generally good to me. The one change I would make is to
> add to "Tue: Primary date from wh
On 11/14/2017 12:50 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Then something isn't working correctly, because then libcomps builds
should be failing in Fedora. It doesn't. It fails in *every other
Linux distribution* that I've built it for (Mageia, openSUSE,
OpenMandriva, Solus, and others...) unless I patch it to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
After removal[0] of other ancient Provides from coreutils, it is time[1] to
remove next legacy part, /bin/* Provides.
There are some number of packages still relying on them, I've fixed most of
them already, although there are some packages
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 01:32 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Florian Weimer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/14/2017 03:54 AM, Philip Kovacs wrote:
One concern is that -Wl,--as-needed requires greater accuracy wit
On 11/14/2017 01:32 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/14/2017 03:54 AM, Philip Kovacs wrote:
One concern is that -Wl,--as-needed requires greater accuracy with the
ordering of objects and
libraries as you link. Also, if a package uses a libra
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 03:54 AM, Philip Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> One concern is that -Wl,--as-needed requires greater accuracy with the
>> ordering of objects and
>> libraries as you link. Also, if a package uses a library indirectly,
>> i.e. A uses C v
On 14 November 2017 at 09:50, Marek Skalický wrote:
> Christopher píše v St 08. 11. 2017 v 22:33 +:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM Igor Gnatenko > oject.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +, Christopher wrote:
>> > > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity,
Christopher píše v St 08. 11. 2017 v 22:33 +:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM Igor Gnatenko oject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +, Christopher wrote:
> > > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and
> > I'm
> > > still a
> > > bit confused on some points
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 10:58 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm going to build protobuf 3.4.1 in Rawhide later today and rebuild all
> dependent packages. There are no incompatible changes as I can see.
Almost everything went well.
[
38 matches
Mail list logo
