orphaned protobuf-c-compiler

Hi, I have orphaned this package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

For example https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/thl/kernel-vanilla-stable/fedora-27/x86_64/ чт, 16 нояб. 2017 г. в 10:41, Samuel Sieb : > On 11/15/2017 11:13 PM, Vascom wrote: > > 4.14 for F27 maybe in the future. > > Most impatient can rebuild it from rawhide srpm. > > I thought there was a COP

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

On 11/15/2017 11:13 PM, Vascom wrote: 4.14 for F27 maybe in the future. Most impatient can rebuild it from rawhide srpm. I thought there was a COPR for testing new kernels on older releases, but I can't find it now or any reference to it. ___ devel

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 15:15 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On 11/16/17, cornel panceac wrote: > > No Linux 4.14 ? > > Are you expecting 6 years support cycle? I think in a sense, many are...? I know fedora is supposed to pretend rhel is "just" downstream's problem but I see a lot of "redhat.co

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

On 11/16/17, cornel panceac wrote: > No Linux 4.14 ? Are you expecting 6 years support cycle? Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

4.14 for F27 maybe in the future. Most impatient can rebuild it from rawhide srpm. чт, 16 нояб. 2017 г. в 9:23, Gaige Lama : > Congratulations and nice work! Fedora 27 is based on Linux 4.13 Cornel. > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:39 AM, cornel panceac > wrote: > >> No Linux 4.14 ? >> >> 2017-11-

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

Congratulations and nice work! Fedora 27 is based on Linux 4.13 Cornel. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:39 AM, cornel panceac wrote: > No Linux 4.14 ? > > 2017-11-14 16:21 GMT+02:00 Zygmunt Krynicki : > >> W dniu 14.11.2017 o 14:43 Matthew Miller pisze: >> > >> > Fedora 27 is here! Thanks and congrat

Re: Fedora 27 is officially released!

No Linux 4.14 ? 2017-11-14 16:21 GMT+02:00 Zygmunt Krynicki : > W dniu 14.11.2017 o 14:43 Matthew Miller pisze: > > > > Fedora 27 is here! Thanks and congratulations to all of the > > people in the Fedora community who worked so hard to bring > > this together. > > Congratulations to everyone who

Re: Fedora 27 is here

Josh Boyer writes: On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-11-15 23:02 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet : >> Hi, >> >> Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! >> >> The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for >> the release. However, there are few packag

Re: Deprecating old networking protocols

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:09 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > >> I think it is probably overdue in the DECnet case, however I >> did get a very happy with it for the most part. Anyway it is >> clear that nobody is maintaining it and it seems sensible >> that

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171115.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Re: grub2-tools problem is causing dnf system-upgrade failures, F26->F27

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 19:07 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > grub2-tools does not belong to a distupgrade repository, causes > software-upgrade failure > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491624 The problem is that grub2-efi-modules no longer exists after all the changes to grub2 in f27, bu

Re: Deprecating old networking protocols

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > I think it is probably overdue in the DECnet case, however I > did get a very happy with it for the most part. Anyway it is > clear that nobody is maintaining it and it seems sensible > that it should get removed unless someone with sufficient >

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 00:47 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the > > > last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle. > > > The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will a

Review Swap

Hi, could someone with MPI experience do these reviews: 1.) mpibash - Parallel scripting right from the Bourne-Again Shell 2.) libcircle - A library used to distribute workloads Except for

Re: Fedora 27 is here

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-11-15 23:02 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet : >> Hi, >> >> Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! >> >> The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for >> the release. However, there are few packages that were broken in

Re: Fedora 27 is here

2017-11-15 23:02 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet : > Hi, > > Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! > > The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for > the release. However, there are few packages that were broken in the > process. The ones I'm aware are currently fixed and been p

Fedora 27 is here

Hi, Just want to say welcome to Fedora 27 ! The RPM Fusion repository is ready to server f27 content in time for the release. However, there are few packages that were broken in the process. The ones I'm aware are currently fixed and been pushed in the updates repos. I plan to fixup the GA repo b

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

I dont want to reduce the time between branching and bodhi enablement. The gap is for any short comings from branching, but if you guys think it is absolutely necessary then I am okay with reducing it to a week. Also, I want to point out that traditionally Alpha freeze and Bodhi enablement will

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

Przemek Klosowski wrote: > In MediaWiki, revisions compared in a diff do not need to > belong to the same article. So for example, to compare the > current revision of...(488139) to the current revision of > ...(505754), you can use the URL > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?diff=505754&ol

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes

___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Call for testing - Firefox CSD/titlebar

Was client-side decoration supposed to work in other DEs, e.g. MATE? Because the native window decoration sticks around. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Modular 27-20171115.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 19/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171115.n.0): ID: 170728 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/170728 ID

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

We're 24 hours into a new build and it still isn't working ... At this rate it'll soon be 7 days since we've been able to do any build in Rawhide that depends on TeX, emacs, ... (which is quite a lot of builds since most documentation tools depend on TeX directly or indirectly). Rich. -- Richa

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete /bin/* Provides from coreutils

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:05 AM Karel Zak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49:34PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > After removal[0] of other ancient Provides from coreutils, it is time[1] > to > > remove next legacy part, /bin/* Provides. > > Do you plan do the same cleanup for another packag

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of obsolete /bin/* Provides from coreutils

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49:34PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > After removal[0] of other ancient Provides from coreutils, it is time[1] to > remove next legacy part, /bin/* Provides. Do you plan do the same cleanup for another packages? :) For example util-linux: grep 'Provides: /' util-linux

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

On 11/14/2017 07:47 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: In MediaWiki, revisions compared in a diff do not need to belong to the same article. So for example, to compare the current revision of...(488139) to the current revision of ...(505754), you can use the URL https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?dif

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171115.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171115.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-17)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-11-17 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues belo

Re: f26->f27 server upgrade, starting system activity accounting tool every 10 minutes

On 11/13/2017 12:09 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > There's still the issue of creating/removing slice User Slice of pcp, > and the Starting/Stopping User Manager fo UID 989 that keeps > happening. Those are triggered by cron jobs in the "pcp" package: /etc/cron.d/pcp-pmie /etc/cron.d/pcp-pmlogger Mi