Marcel Oliver wrote:
> Since I upgraded to F27, the KDE print dialog (for me the most
> relevant application is okular) fails to see the available printer
> options, nor does it see the printer defaults. It also does not save
> changed settings from one print job to the next. Other applications
>
7.02.2018 14:58 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 07/02/18 02:09 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >[...]
> >Also, just to clarify: I still don't know whether it is correct to just
> >bump the required version of libstdc++, I just bump it because it has been
> >done so many times in the past.
>
> "libstd
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS).
If they're not i
Hi All,
I am sending this out to multiple lists to get it wide exposure. Red Hat let
me know about the year end closing dates in an email yesterday. In order for
me to be able to get our items resolved on time, I need to request the
following:
1) All reimbursements must be filed and paid by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Yes only for EPEL of course. I need you to give me the permissions if you
accept.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542721
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> Would you consider adding me as a co-maintainer so I can mairtain EPEL7
> version for perl(Text::Haml) and perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon? My FAS is
> ec
ishcherb opened a new pull-request against the project: `bugzilla` that you are
following:
``
Update Python 2 dependency declarations to new packaging standards
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bugzilla/pull-request/1
__
ishcherb opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Inline-Python`
that you are following:
``
Update Python 2 dependency declarations to new packaging standards
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Inline-Python/pull-request/1
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542727
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-experimental-0.019-2.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542727
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-experimental-0.019-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0a36dcf92a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542771
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from Fedo
On 07/02/18 02:09 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
Hello,
I have opened 3 pull requests for compat-gcc-34:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-gcc-34/pull-requests
fixing FTBFS errors in 3 currently existing Fedora releases.
Thank you all who helped me with this task. What is the next step
t
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1066 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
828 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
411 https://bodhi.fedorap
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
938 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
828 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
800 https://bodhi.fedoraprojec
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 3.2.2018 v 15:45 Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> >
> > so I can stop uploading package to my fedorapeople public_html site and
> build via URLs.
>
> Another option is to use
> copr-cli build foo.src.rpm
> which nowdays can submit src.rpm dir
Hi Nicolas,
before I start arguing, I appreciate all your hard work on improving the
Go guidelines, spending so much time explaining reasoning behind your
decision. Also appreciating the effort on making the life easier for
packagers, not just in the Go land, but throughout the distribution as
- Original Message -
> From: "nicolas mailhot"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 7:34:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora pac
I just orphaned, because lack of time, lack of interest and lack of
upstream collaboration :
apigen
php-apigen-theme-bootstrap
php-apigen-theme-default
php-kdyby-events
php-kdyby-strict-objects
php-latte
php-nette
php-nette-ap
in the meantime, the issue is discussed here
https://github.com/openclonk/openclonk/issues/64
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
19 matches
Mail list logo