Hi,
I orphaned vim-vimoutliner.
I switched to emacs and haven't touched it for some time.
Thanks,
Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
On 09/02/18 08:25, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
- Mail original -
De: "Terry Barnaby"
If
it was important to get the data to disk it would have been using
fsync(), FS sync, or some other transaction based app
??? Many people use NFS NAS because doing RAID+Backup on every client
Hi,
A new build for python-jsonpatch was done some days ago in
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1024370 but it has
not appeared in rawhide repo yet.
Any idea about what may be happening?
Regards,
Alfredo
___
devel mailing list --
May it be related to this?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T2STBDPXKZ7DHC7GS6VLM3ESYI6RHVDM/
V.
Dne 9.2.2018 v 16:18 Clemens Eisserer napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> Since a week or so my laptop has severe SATA issues when running on
> battery-only.
>
>
On 02/12/2018 11:00 AM, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new build for python-jsonpatch was done some days ago in
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1024370 but it has
> not appeared in rawhide repo yet.
>
> Any idea about what may be happening?
This build was comp
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:09:25 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> I'm sure that in the past it was difference here :|
You are mistaken about that.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:39:19 +0100, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> > The following:
> > %files
> > /some/directory/
> >
> > is equivalent to:
> > %files
> > %dir /some/directory
> > /some/directory/*
> >
> >
> > There's nothing wrong here.
> >
> >
>
> Exactly. IMHO, use of %dir macro for "top" pkg
On 2018-02-12, 08:08 GMT, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> I orphaned vim-vimoutliner.
>
> I switched to emacs and haven't touched it for some time.
You could let me know. Adopting this poor orphan.
Matěj
--
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC
On 10/02/18 12:32 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 .
Looks like it, rebuilding with C++11 let it com
With the recent gcc 8 issues I've been trying to do some build tests on my
system but I keep getting
gcc-8.0.1-0.9.fc28 even after performing a --scrub=all instead of
gcc-8.0.1-0.13.fc28 which was built yesterday or even gcc-8.0.1-0.12.fc28
from the 9th...
What gives? It can't just be slow mirror
On 02/12/2018 02:35 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> With the recent gcc 8 issues I've been trying to do some build tests on my
> system but I keep getting
> gcc-8.0.1-0.9.fc28 even after performing a --scrub=all instead of
> gcc-8.0.1-0.13.fc28 which was built yesterday or even gcc-8.0.1-0.12.fc28
> from
Hi.
I am want to un-retire tcl-thread package.
New Review Request already approved
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544384
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
>
> There hasn't been any successful rawhide compose in a couple days.
Ah! I didn't even think of it that way... So mock doesn't pull directly
from the buildroot. I guess most of the time that makes sense, you want to
have a (usually) kno
On 02/12/2018 02:51 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski
> wrote:
>
>>
>> There hasn't been any successful rawhide compose in a couple days.
>
>
> Ah! I didn't even think of it that way... So mock doesn't pull directly
> from the buildroot. I guess most of
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Thankfully, as Rex Dieter points out, this is finally being addressed in
>> Qt 5.11 (see https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.11 and
>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-54464). Unfortunately, that release
>> is still a few months away from now.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:12:43AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> * Many times people put some useless messages in there, so we
> probably don't want to convert old history to git-based changelogs
> and have point where we ask people to start writing useful commit
> messages.
There are lots of usel
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:34:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Wherever it lives, this would be read by Bodhi, so there's
> > would be need to enter it more than once. And, perhaps a DNF plugin
> > could be made to read and display this information for systems
> > administrators.
>
> I fully supp
On 02/09/2018 08:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever
>>> in their changelog section.
>>> Is there any reason I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:08:47AM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 09/02/18 08:25, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> > - Mail original -
> > De: "Terry Barnaby"
> > > If
> > > it was important to get the data to disk it would have been using
> > > fsync(), FS sync, or some other transac
On 12/02/18 17:06, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 09:08:47AM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 09/02/18 08:25, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
- Mail original -
De: "Terry Barnaby"
If
it was important to get the data to disk it would have been using
fsync(), FS sync, or
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:09:32PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> One thing on this, that I forgot to ask, doesn't fsync() work properly with
> an NFS server side async mount then ?
No.
If a server sets "async" on an export, there is absolutely no way for a
client to guarantee that data reaches di
On 12/02/18 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:09:32PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
One thing on this, that I forgot to ask, doesn't fsync() work properly with
an NFS server side async mount then ?
No.
If a server sets "async" on an export, there is absolutely no way for a
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not coming from a programming background I found the learning curve pretty
> steep when I first tried to become a packager, I'm not sure I wouldn't have
> given up if I had to do it now.
Thanks for speaking up about this. I'm having trouble f
On 02/12/2018 10:14 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Not coming from a programming background I found the learning curve pretty
>> steep when I first tried to become a packager, I'm not sure I wouldn't have
>> given up if I had to do it now.
>
> Than
On 12/02/18 17:35, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/02/18 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:09:32PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
One thing on this, that I forgot to ask, doesn't fsync() work
properly with
an NFS server side async mount then ?
No.
If a server sets "async" on a
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:35:49PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Well that seems like a major drop off, I always thought that fsync() would
> work in this case.
No, it never has.
> I don't understand why fsync() should not operate as
> intended ? Sounds like this NFS async thing needs some work !
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-13 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-02-13 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 08:12:58PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 12/02/18 17:35, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > On 12/02/18 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:09:32PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > > > One thing on this, that I forgot to ask, doesn't fsync() work
> > > > p
Hi All,
We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the
full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can be found here[4].
The
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 10/02/18 12:32 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
>>>
>>> Likely
Dennis Gilmore wrote on 02/13/2018 08:06 AM:
Hi All,
We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the
full list of packages that ar
I don't think, removing the changelog entirely is a good idea. We do not
have suitable replacement.
1)
I agree with said. GIT commit messages should describe the work of
developer.
Thus messages like "typo fix" "revert of revert of merge of ..." "forgot to
add new-sources" are common, and should s
On 13/02/18 01:00, Michal Schorm wrote:
> 5)
> The changelogs are long ass hell.
> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest?
> (It will be still kept in GIT history)
> 2 releases could be 2-20 entries, depends of work done.
> But still it looks short enough for me.
Whe
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:03 AM, J. Randall Owens <
jrowens.fed...@ghiapet.net> wrote:
>
> When you say 2 releases, are you talking about package or Fedora
> releases? I'd favour an approach of keeping all the changes since
> release, or since branching might be even better, or since the release
>
On 12/02/18 22:14, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 08:12:58PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/02/18 17:35, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/02/18 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:09:32PM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
One thing on this, that I forgot to ask, do
Is anybody going to fix the errors this caused? Namely this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537140
Thx
Vít
Dne 9.1.2018 v 18:46 Jan Kurik napsal(a):
> = System Wide Change: Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcr
I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't find
failed koji build for it to see logs.
Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually?
вт, 13 февр. 2018 г. в 3:37, Mamoru TASAKA :
> Dennis Gilmore wrote on 02/13/2018 08:06 AM:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have now comple
Forwarding to Fedora devel. User perspective (API v1 vs. v2) is important.
Pavel
On Monday, February 12, 2018 11:17:26 PM CET Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello,
> we are currently discussing how to deal with the current situation of
> inconsistent Copr API.
>
> If you are interested in this topic an
39 matches
Mail list logo
