On 03/04/2018 03:02 PM, Germano Massullo wrote:
This tag is wrong and for example on x86_64 CPU architecture systems, it
must be
"path": "/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"
How could I patch this file without having to hardcode the /usr/lib64 path?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean,
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 28/127 (x86_64), 8/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 197113 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/197113
ID: 197126 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here... the fedora-websites repo is on
> pagure.io, not on src.fedoraproject.org. Or do you mean you are trying
> to submit a pull request for a package on src.fedoraproject.org not the
> fedora-websites repo?
Yea
# F28 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-03-05
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have two proposed blockers for Fedora 28 Beta and we're
entering the freeze, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow.
If you have time today, you can take a look a
On 03/04/2018 05:07 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Looking at the documentation in the wiki[1] I'm confused...
>
> Short version of the steps:
> 1. Got to pagure.io and fork the project...
>
> Umm... You can't fork a project from the Fedora instance of pagure (
> src.fedoraproject.org) from pagure.io.
Le samedi 03 mars 2018 à 11:47 -0300, Athos Ribeiro a écrit :
>
> Are there any intentions to push the macros into f28? I really liked
> the
> improvements in the spec file sizes, but porting too many packages now
> and keep them updated in both f28 and rawhide (making the branches
> completely di
dnf update --relasever=29 distro-sync --disablerepo=* --
enablerepo=rawhide
Dennis
El sáb, 03-03-2018 a las 21:15 +, Philip Kovacs escribió:
> I would settle for knowledge of where the f29/rawhide gpg keys are
> hidden so I import them.
>
> The "To Rawhide" instructions below are outdated as
Il 04/03/2018 16:57, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
> What's wrong with hard-coding? (e.g. so it to be something like
> %{_libdir}/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so
> )
The path
/usr/lib64/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so
on a 32bit system would be
/usr/lib/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so
then something like
%
On Mar 4, 2018 16:59, "Rex Dieter" wrote:
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Package
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox-pkcs11-loader
> (upstream) https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader
>
> contains file
> https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader/blob/
master/onepinopenscpkc
Germano Massullo wrote:
> Package
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox-pkcs11-loader
> (upstream) https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader
>
> contains file
> https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader/blob/master/onepinopenscpkcs11.json
> that has the tag
> "path": "onepi
Package
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox-pkcs11-loader
(upstream) https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader
contains file
https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader/blob/master/onepinopenscpkcs11.json
that has the tag
"path": "onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so"
This tag is wrong an
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:35:00PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > * It means things will likely be broken longer as there is less urgency
> > to fix them quickly.
> This means less stress for maintainers who are usually not working full time
> on Fedora.
Which, let's not forget, is the *vast* maj
@ Samuel Rakitničan
Please re-send your massages and send later massages to below thread, thanks:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.
From c908639873a2947743665227f9272e0a7d2fd200 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Mar 04 2018 13:25:12 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
---
diff --git a/perl-Cookie-Baker.spec b/perl-Cookie-Baker.spec
index be30750..3
Looking at the documentation in the wiki[1] I'm confused...
Short version of the steps:
1. Got to pagure.io and fork the project...
Umm... You can't fork a project from the Fedora instance of pagure (
src.fedoraproject.org) from pagure.io...
Thanks,
Richard
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ho
On Sat, 03 Mar 2018 19:42:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> PS:
>
> I wrote:
>
> > Richard Hughes wrote:
> >> 64x64 is a very low bar indeed, compared to all of the other
> >> platforms, e.g. Windows Store or the Apple AppStore.
> >
> > All that's going to happen with such a requirement is th
Hi Jason,
> > "nm" == nicolas mailhot wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts wrote:
> > nm> And the forge macros are now available since
> > nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed the push due to
> > upstream
> > nm> renaming the file). Heartfelt thanks to Jason Tibbitts !
> > Please don't forget to let
Please send massages to below thread, thanks:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
> I am one happy user of Spinics too. I find HyperKitty interface slow and
> buggy. The only
> way I am using HyperKitty is to post a message, and every time I find some
> issue which I
> have to go to a report process first. For example right now HyperKitty is not
> displaying
> comments of thi
19 matches
Mail list logo
