Germano Massullo wrote:
> Are you sure? Line 43 is in the middle of a sed command arguments
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/webextension-token-signing/blob/f27/f/webextension-token-signing.spec#_43
Yes, I am sure! That sed sets the command line arguments for qmake.
> I tried to set LIBPATH i
# F28 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-03-19
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have several proposed blockers and freeze exception issues
to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
Remember that DST started last week, so we're
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. We'll be
mainly in F28 Beta validation mode this week: go/no-go is on Thursday
and we'll be trying to get things in shape by then.
If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my
place, please just go ahead and send
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 206544 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/206544
ID: 206548 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https:
2018-03-16 4:48 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler :
> Germano Massullo wrote:
>> upstream made a patch
>> https://github.com/open-eid/chrome-token-signing/issues/80#issuecomment-373545367
>> but it looks like it does not work.
>> Could you please check if I made any mistake in applying the patch in
>> the RPM
On 17/03/2018 17:41, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Trande
> wrote:
>> 'blake2' code inside 'Openclonk-8.1' source code requires SSE2 support
>> that seems unavailable on PPC/s390/ARM architectures [1]:
>
> Adding to the other replies, the issue seems to be that o
OLD: Fedora-28-20180316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-28-20180317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 867.44 KiB
Size of dropped packages:9.27 MiB
Size
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> 'blake2' code inside 'Openclonk-8.1' source code requires SSE2 support
> that seems unavailable on PPC/s390/ARM architectures [1]:
Adding to the other replies, the issue seems to be that openclonk has
bundled the blake2 project, but only t
El sáb, 17-03-2018 a las 17:25 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió:
> Hello everyone.
>
>
> Please, can you confirm that SSE2 support is not on those
> architectures?
> If it's so, i will obliged to exclude new release of Openclonk on
> PPC/s390/ARM.
sse2 is a intel cpu extention it is only availabl
On 17/03/18 16:25, Antonio Trande wrote:
'blake2' code inside 'Openclonk-8.1' source code requires SSE2 support
that seems unavailable on PPC/s390/ARM architectures [1]:
I don't think it's available on i686 either, when using the Fedora
compiler options, as we target older processors that didn
Hello everyone.
'blake2' code inside 'Openclonk-8.1' source code requires SSE2 support
that seems unavailable on PPC/s390/ARM architectures [1]:
[ 0%] Building C object thirdparty/blake2/CMakeFiles/blake2.dir/blake2b.c.o
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/openclonk-8.1/build/thirdparty/blake2 &&
/usr/bin/
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 206350 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/206350
ID: 206379 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
U
Hi folks!
I'm not doing a full blocker status mail right now (it's Saturday...),
but we do have several updates intended to fix proposed or accepted
blocker or FE issues ATM. It'd be great if we could get testing on
these updates so they're ready to go (or, of course, if you find
issues, we know *
Thanks to Jonathan, Athos, and Tom for the discussion.
I added one of Tom's links and pushed the text:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#One-off_contributions
I am going to unsubscribe from this list due to high volume.
--
Kind regards,
René
__
On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 15:15 +, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
> > Don't be afraid of koji. :)
>
> I couldn't agree more, Koji's a pretty nice project to work on.
> It might seems scary for newcomers because of all the ingrained
> knowledge and assumptions, but once you get close the co
> Don't be afraid of koji. :)
I couldn't agree more, Koji's a pretty nice project to work on.
It might seems scary for newcomers because of all the ingrained knowledge and
assumptions, but once you get close the community is nice and friendly :).
>
> It is under active development. Of course,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 4:31 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto a écrit :
>>
>> I think you shouldn't be so upset, it is an error in a pre-alfa/beta
>> version and seems it is already fixed. Who still use cds ? , one pen
>> usb do the work much better
On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 09:31 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto a écrit :
> >
> > I think you shouldn't be so upset, it is an error in a pre-
> > alfa/beta
> > version and seems it is already fixed. Who still use cds ? , one
> > pen
> > usb do the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 47
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 23:31 +, Nikolaus Waxweiler a écrit :
> > DejaVu had already proven at that time fontforge was more than good
> > enough for a complex modern font.
>
> In the sense that you can write a complex application in assembler,
> yes. With an assembler full of quirks and bug
Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto a écrit :
>
> I think you shouldn't be so upset, it is an error in a pre-alfa/beta
> version and seems it is already fixed. Who still use cds ? , one pen
> usb do the work much better ...
Some of us use Fedora on chromebooks.
Google in its in
Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 17:33 -0400, Jared K. Smith a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin com> wrote:
> > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are
> > all renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which
> > standardizes pa
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
23 matches
Mail list logo
