The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1119 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
881 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
463
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
991 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
881 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
853
Hello, all:
I am going to update oniguruma to 6.8.1 on rawhide and F-28. Compared to
6.7.1, two symbols are removed (although I don't think these symbols are
used by other packages) and so this will cause soname bump.
I will rebuild all affected packages below:
jq-0:1.5-11.fc28.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560766
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562462
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IPC-Run-0.99-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-08fce77011
--
You are receiving this mail
Le samedi 31 mars 2018 à 12:46 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le samedi 31 mars 2018 à 12:44 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> > Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 20:17 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit
> > :
> > > Hello,
> >
> > Hi Robert-André
> >
> > If you don't mind, I'd rather have all the
Le samedi 31 mars 2018 à 12:44 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 20:17 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> > Hello,
>
> Hi Robert-André
>
> If you don't mind, I'd rather have all the bits in
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/More_Go_Packaging/builds/
Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 20:17 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> Hello,
Hi Robert-André
If you don't mind, I'd rather have all the bits in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/More_Go_Packaging/builds/
merged first. It took a hell a lot of a time to get those to work
reliably on
Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 16:45 +0900, Akira TAGOH a écrit :
>
> The problem on this workaround is that we need an exception for
> packaging because the packaging guidelines mentions we must package
> variants into the same (sub-)package for family[1]
And the problem is not so much the
Am Dienstag, den 13.03.2018, 10:11 +0100 schrieb Nikos
Mavrogiannopoulos:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:08 +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing
> > libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
14 matches
Mail list logo