Anyone knows when RHEL 7.5 packages will be available for aarch64 in
koji, so that new dependencies get picked up? I'm trying to build EPEL7
xorgxrdp against the latest xorg-x11-server and all other arches have
1.19.5, but aarch64 is stuck on 1.19.3.
PS. Buildroot overrides don't work here,
On 11 April 2018 at 03:34, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new version rpkg-1.53 is released.
>
> This is the first version delivering Python 3 package, which is
> python3-rpkg. Thanks Miro Hrončok for making the patch.
[..]
It would be good to port fedpkg to python 3.
Thanks Chris for the follow up.
I also wanted to go for OTC fonts, but both Akira Tagoh and Owen Taylor who
are fonts rendering experts advised against switching this late in the
cycle to the .ttc fonts in case there are any serious regressions for any
apps (we are not aware of any yet but there
On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 00:17 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> ID: 221584Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221584
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 43/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180411.n.3):
ID: 221340 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221340
ID: 221348
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 221584 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221584
ID: 221587 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566767
Bug ID: 1566767
Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.70 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Code-TidyAll
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:43:28 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > writes:
>
> > Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
> > coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
> > uploading the updates
Dennis Gilmore wrote,
> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the
> full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can
Hi,
The LastPass CLI package is badly outdated, with 2 major bugs.
It seems the EPEL package was abandoned ~2016
I have emailed the maintainer (Tom Prince) directly just to confirm, and
have not hard back.
I've also opened a bug here with the details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182
--- Comment #14 from Alex B ---
I can confirm that the perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-22.fc27 fixes the issue. Thanks a
lot for that !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103
chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e12bc7bed5
nodejs-6.14.0-1.el7 libuv-1.19.2-1.el7
9
> writes:
> Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
> coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
> uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed?
Well, there's only really a need to coordinate if the versioning
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:27 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> Shouldn't the priority be to make Fedora welcoming to all, and not to
>> limiting the audience based on an artificial size limitation?
>
> This is
Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed?
--
GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar
Tox ID:
OLD: Fedora-28-20180411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 19.30 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On 12.4.2018 20:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am hear-by volunteer to support python27 in EPEL8 and EPEL6. It will
be based off of the EL7 code.
Thank you. For EPEL6, consult the guidelines on how to add such package.
For the other EPEL you have mentioned, I unfortunately cannot say
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 12 April 2018 at 11:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>>
>>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
On 12 April 2018 at 11:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
>>> everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562762
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DB_File-1.841-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563237
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.26-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562267
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Git-Wrapper-0.048-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:27 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:36:33 +0200, you wrote:
>
> > Tomasz Torcz ?? wrote:
> > > While we at it, let's drop all latin fonts, too. Cyrillic should be
> > > enable to cover most of the world's usage and is quite similar to basic
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
--- Comment #25 from Miro Hrončok ---
Oh. yes, I was using your scratch build. Let me try with rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
--- Comment #24 from Colin Macdonald ---
Are you still using my scratch build? I fixed that texlive-biblatex version
number and pushed to rawhide yesterday.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547303
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
perl-5.24.4-RC1 delivers updated Module::CoreList 5.20180414_24 that updates
only data and does not remove the Module::CoreList::TieHashDelta module. That
means the same-version CPAN
On mercredi 11 avril 2018 19:27:55 CEST rugk wrote:
> Hi,
> I saw Joplin[1], which recently got NextCloud integration[2], is not
> packaged in Fedora. Maybe one could do so?
> Best regards,
> rugk
>
> [1] https://joplin.cozic.net/
> [2]
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558769
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
On 11.4.2018 21:26, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi Miro,
what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3?
If you are asking about next major RHEL release, I'm afraid I cannot tell.
If you are asking about Fedora then there are two options:
* somebody maintains python2
* we drop such
On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that
encouraged people to change the python3 conditional from "if fedora" to
"if fedora or rhel > 7"
Good Morning Everyone,
The Fedora Infrastructure has been running a jenkins instance in its
cloud for their own needs. That instance gained some tractions in our
community to the point that some projects are relying on it.
Unfortunately, our best-effort isn't sufficient to keep this instance in
a
Good Morning Everyone,
The Fedora Infrastructure has been running a jenkins instance in its
cloud for their own needs. That instance gained some tractions in our
community to the point that some projects are relying on it.
Unfortunately, our best-effort isn't sufficient to keep this instance in
a
On 04/12/2018 07:40 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
dereferencing type-punned
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 50/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180407.n.1):
ID: 220889 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/220889
ID: 220890 Test:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564935
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-version-0.99.21-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b01190cfb2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566497
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-version-0.99.21-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b01190cfb2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566497
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566497
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566497
Bug ID: 1566497
Summary: perl-version-0.9921 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-version
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 12. 04. 2018 v 11:50 +0200:
>
> Dne 12.4.2018 v 10:26 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> > Added packages: 421
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > = ADDED PACKAGES =
> > Package: ReviewBoard-3.0.6-1.module_1655+c1bb0ce4
> > Summary: Web-based code review tool
> > RPMs:
Hi team,
please review a PR for dynamic plugins test suite fix.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49581
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49626
I devided it in two parts for easy review.
https://pagure.io/fork/spichugi/389-ds-base/c/9c7a76e27adfff02c40abdd4d49acfa187b97a14
First part
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm getting:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
> lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
> dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>
Dne 12.4.2018 v 10:26 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> Added packages: 421
... snip ...
> = ADDED PACKAGES =
> Package: ReviewBoard-3.0.6-1.module_1655+c1bb0ce4
> Summary: Web-based code review tool
> RPMs:ReviewBoard
> Size:12.19 MiB
>
> Package:
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
--- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok ---
I have texlive from rawhide and I am rebuilding it for older Fedoras because I
want the new stuff. However, biber is blocking me. So I tried to rebuild your
provided srpm for older
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
--- Comment #22 from Colin Macdonald ---
Miro, I'm confused. AFAICT, F28 is still on texlive-6:2016 (?) So I don't
think I should bump biber in F28 yet.
The f28 machine listed on the Test Machine Resources is not allowing
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-04-13 15:00 UTC'
NOTE: we discussed moving
48 matches
Mail list logo