Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180517.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180516.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180517.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 167 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.60 MiB Size of dropped packages

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

Ken Taylor wrote: > On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Ken Taylor wrote: >> >>> I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a >>> newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine. >>> If I may ask two questions... >>> >>> Does this version of

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

good idea, EPIC release --> rhel release, centOS release keep the old RPMS when EPIC package upgrade. no compatibility issue any more. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49683 - Add JSON option for lib389 CLI tools

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49683 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49699 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1579574] New: perl-BSON-v1.6.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579574 Bug ID: 1579574 Summary: perl-BSON-v1.6.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-BSON Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On 17 May 2018 at 18:11, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers. >> This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:36:17PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I have been worried about a negative feedback loop here on packagers. > This is a new technology and packagers aren't usually people who care > about EPEL. Having them to deal with multiple OS's they don't use > makes it more

[Bug 1579524] New: perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579524 Bug ID: 1579524 Summary: perl-libs License tag - HSLR or HSRL? Product: Fedora Version: 28 Component: perl Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: fed...@svgames.pl

[EPEL-devel] Re: Blue Sky Discussion: EPEL-next or EPIC

On 17 May 2018 at 15:31, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 03:06:43PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Modules > [...] >> EPIC-next >> >>The tooling for modules can match how Fedora approaches it. This >>means that rules for module

Re: Release fedpkg-1.33

On 17.5.2018 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 05/17/2018 03:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/17/2018 07:51 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote: fedpkg has been compatible with Python 3, and defaults to Python 3 in rawhide. Doesn't this break commands like “fedpkg build” because the Koji libraries only

Re: Release fedpkg-1.33

On 05/17/2018 03:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 05/17/2018 07:51 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote: >> fedpkg has been compatible with Python 3, and defaults to Python 3 in >> rawhide. > > Doesn't this break commands like “fedpkg build” because the Koji > libraries only support Kerberos authentication on

[Bug 1578594] perl-BSON-v1.6.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Re: wine 3 package

On 05/16/2018 11:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Ken Taylor wrote: I installed the wine 3 package from epel-testing this morning on a newly installed CentOS 7.5 machine. The installation seemed to go fine. If I may ask two questions... Does this version of wine support 32 bit Windows programs on

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Let's Label Our Variants!

Jan Kurik wrote: > Start using the VARIANT and VARIANT_ID fields in /etc/os-release for > Spins, Labs and the base container image rather than just the main > Fedora Editions. While I agree that this needs to be handled the same way for Editions and Spins (because I think this distinction is

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-05-18)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-18 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On 17 May 2018 at 07:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 05/17/2018 01:54 AM, Ian Kent wrote: >> >> I think you'll find NIS is still quite widely used. >> >> NIS Plus was an attempt to improve NIS but (AFAIK) it never became widely >> used. >> LDAP is another attempt to provide

Re: how to become maintainer or co-maintainer of orphaned package

thanks, have already opened a ticket at pagure https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7504 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: how to become maintainer or co-maintainer of orphaned package

On jeudi 17 mai 2018 14:09:35 CEST Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > i have a question regarding this package: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/vdr-epgfixer > Thanks > Martin > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To

[Bug 1579340] New: perl-Test-mysqld-1.0000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579340 Bug ID: 1579340 Summary: perl-Test-mysqld-1. is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-mysqld Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: how to become maintainer or co-maintainer of orphaned package

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package чт, 17 мая 2018 г. в 15:10, Martin Gansser : > Hi, > i have a question regarding this package: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/vdr-epgfixer > >

how to become maintainer or co-maintainer of orphaned package

Hi, i have a question regarding this package: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/vdr-epgfixer Thanks Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On 05/17/2018 01:54 AM, Ian Kent wrote: I think you'll find NIS is still quite widely used. NIS Plus was an attempt to improve NIS but (AFAIK) it never became widely used. LDAP is another attempt to provide much of the table information provided by NIS but it is far more complicated to

[Modularity] Working Group IRC meeting minutes (2018-05-15)

= #fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) = Meeting started by nils at 14:00:54 UTC.

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

Thank you all for you replies, it helped a lot! :) On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:54 AM, Ian Kent wrote: > On 16/05/18 23:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > >

Re: Release fedpkg-1.33

On 05/17/2018 07:51 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote: fedpkg has been compatible with Python 3, and defaults to Python 3 in rawhide. Doesn't this break commands like “fedpkg build” because the Koji libraries only support Kerberos authentication on Python 2? Thanks, Florian

Re: [systemd-devel] Running “telinit u” on glibc update

On 05/16/2018 11:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Hence, please go aahead and drop it from the rpm scripts. Thanks for the clear advice. I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579225 to track the removal. Florian ___ devel

[rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI" (f28)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI on branch f28, which you are following: 6961010867f6150973433d260d0e74b6e81f48b2Jitka PlesnikovaSpecify all dependencies; Modernize spec file To view more about the commits, visit:

[rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI] New Commits To "rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI on branch master, which you are following: 6961010867f6150973433d260d0e74b6e81f48b2Jitka PlesnikovaSpecify all dependencies; Modernize spec file To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, 17 May 2018, 1:08 p.m. Peter Robinson, wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: > >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > >> PATCHES. > >> > >> Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec >

[Bug 1579091] perl-AnyEvent-Handle-UDP-0.049 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579091 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[rpms/perl-AnyEvent-Handle-UDP] New Commits To "rpms/perl-AnyEvent-Handle-UDP" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/perl-AnyEvent-Handle-UDP on branch master, which you are following: 5d20c58a0ffd0450dd234160b8bf4818913005f2Jitka Plesnikova0.049 bump To view more about the commits, visit:

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF >> PATCHES. >> >> Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec >> >> You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 >> >> The gotchas are left

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > Put the patch name in ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec just before END OF > PATCHES. > > Run rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec > > You will have the kernel rpm files in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 > > The gotchas are left as an exercise for the reader (if you are a > newbie, there will be lots of them). :-)