Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FPCmeeting Thursday at 2018-06-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1
onirc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==2018-06-07 09:00
PDT US/Pacific2018-06-07 12:00
Greetings, all!
The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time.
A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 321 votes (107 * 3).
The results for the elections are as
Greetings, all!
The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time.
A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 321 votes (107 * 3).
The results for the elections are as
Greetings, all!
The elections for Council - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Fedora Council is electing 1 seat this time.
A total of 110 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 220 votes (110 * 2).
The results for the elections are as follows:
Greetings, all!
The elections for Council - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Fedora Council is electing 1 seat this time.
A total of 110 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 220 votes (110 * 2).
The results for the elections are as follows:
Greetings, all!
The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time.
A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 321 votes (107 * 3).
The results for the elections are as
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.9-20180606git791e5aa.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has
just started. Please vote for your candidates to FESCo [1].
You can vote till June 13th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC.
On Community blog [2] you can also find interviews with all the
candidates. Please have a
Hi,
the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has
just started. Please vote for your candidates to FESCo [1].
You can vote till June 13th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC.
On Community blog [2] you can also find interviews with all the
candidates. Please have a
I somehow wound up owning python-sphinx_rtd_theme, I think probably because
I was the first person to attempt to do a build that needed it. :-)
Anyhow, I am not at all sure that I am competent to be the maintainer. I
need some advice. There is a new upstream version available, 0.4.0. I am
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:27 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Hello everyone. Months ago, I started working on updates to a couple of
> our mathematical packages. But they, in turn, required other packages to
> be updated, and those updates required other packages to be updated, and
> the whole thing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588245
Bug ID: 1588245
Summary: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Text-SimpleTable
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588242
Bug ID: 1588242
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.044 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585521
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.83 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.84 is
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49745
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49764
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585345
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Date-Manip-6.71 is |perl-Date-Manip-6.72 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588216
Bug ID: 1588216
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588217
Bug ID: 1588217
Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9176 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPANPLUS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
I would like to retire loki-lib.
It's a C++ library that hasn't been updated in nearly 10 years. It FTBS for
some releases (circa F23)
Repoquery says that nothing in Fedora depends on it.
Regards, Sergio
___
devel mailing list --
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49702
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49763
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Outage: db-qa server - 2018-06-07 23:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-06-07 23:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-06-07 23:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49761
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49762
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180604.n.0):
ID: 245927 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245927
ID: 245960
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49754
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49760
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49734
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49759
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 06/04/2018 06:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote:
Thanks for the insight. Yes, I can see the advantages. However, have
things really gotten so bad that it justifies ejecting part of the
community?
The cost of i686 support is not insignificant. Most of that happens
upstream (like features only
On 06/04/2018 03:59 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 06/04/2018 04:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon
MP supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686
binaries are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and
On 06/06/2018 06:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
Adjust the redhat-rpm-config, gcc, and glibc packages to switch to the
new compiler flags. Except for mstackrealign, there is substantial
experience with this
Hi everybody,
The elementary project has recently released version 5.0 of their granite
toolkit extensions library, which includes an soname bump, and some
deprecated APIs were removed.
I intend to update the granite package in rawhide next week, and I am
fairly confident that this won't cause
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> Adjust the redhat-rpm-config, gcc, and glibc packages to switch to the
> new compiler flags. Except for mstackrealign, there is substantial
> experience with this configuration downstream.
Does this change
Hello all,
I am making some headway improving the Fedora look in the Mac firmware picker
on Retina screens.
1. Providing retina scaled text
The text (as an image) is provided by fedora-logos and linked into
/boot/efi/EFI/fedora/.disk_label by mactel-boot. To support retina screens a
double
Hi,
On 01-06-18 22:29, Peter Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III said:
If we're going to patch grub to expand the set of keys it will watch
for, is it possible to just expand the set to encompass all keys? We
don't
The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-06-08 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586067
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-perlfaq-5.20180605-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180604.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180606.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 19
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 185
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
I am actually very curious about the results of such a move, and know
whether it is going to have a significant impact today. Debian has
already tried experimenting with it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586067
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] :
> >
> > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following:
> >
> > perl-Array-Diff
> > perl-Class-Field
> > perl-Class-MethodMaker
> > perl-Data-Section
> >
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] :
> >
> > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following:
> >
> > perl-Array-Diff
> > perl-Class-Field
> > perl-Class-MethodMaker
> > perl-Data-Section
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578594
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579574
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582677
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
On 06/06/2018 08:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2018-06-05, John Florian wrote:
Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if you're
stuck with it? I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my
normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, but
it
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180606.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:07:03PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
>wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >Â Â When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message:Ã*Â Repo
> >Â Â
On 06/06/2018 02:24 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Checking rpm --showrc, I can see rawhide sets %{fedora} to 29 and
there does not seem any mention of rawhide in the showrc output.
What would people recommend to distinguish rawhide from non-rawhide?
The mass rebuild, if there is any, happens
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-BSSolv` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebase to 0.14
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-BSSolv/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1c841646c0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dbcbe02783
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
* Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] :
>
> Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following:
>
> perl-Array-Diff
> perl-Class-Field
> perl-Class-MethodMaker
> perl-Data-Section
> perl-Software-License
I'll gladly take ownership of these packages.
My FAS username
* Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] :
>
> Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following:
>
> perl-Array-Diff
> perl-Class-Field
> perl-Class-MethodMaker
> perl-Data-Section
> perl-Software-License
I'll gladly take ownership of these packages.
My FAS username
Hello,
I try to create SWID Tags for Fedora and I'd like to be able to
distinguish when running the rpm build on rawhide, as opposed to
"released" version.
Checking rpm --showrc, I can see rawhide sets %{fedora} to 29 and
there does not seem any mention of rawhide in the showrc output.
What
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, at 2:38 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mar, 05-06-2018 a las 15:59 -0400, Adam Jackson escribió:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 13:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > > as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel
> > > changes
> > > to stop building a i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982
Bug ID: 1587982
Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 2018-06-05, John Florian wrote:
> Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if you're
> stuck with it? I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my
> normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, but
> it would kind of suck to have to boot
Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I
needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining
many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I'm overworked
with other stuff. Fortunately various people people in Perl SIG have been
doing a
Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I
needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining
many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I'm overworked
with other stuff. Fortunately various people people in Perl SIG have been
doing a
On 06/06/2018 03:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 01 June 2018 at 12:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have two suggestions:
>>>
>>> - on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force
>>> grub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582164
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 11:41 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
> wrote:
> > Note that this change, if applied, includes browsers shipped by
> > fedora
> > (i.e., firefox). That is pretty much all or nothing plan, either we
> > bump the
Please let me remind that today (June 6th, 2018) is the last day of
the Voting period to Fedora Council [1] and Mindshare Committee [2].
You can vote till 23:59:59 UTC.
Interviews can be found on Community blog [3].
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-may-2018
[2]
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 16:34 -0400, John Florian wrote:
> On 06/05/2018 12:25 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 16:11 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> > > "Fallback option" always smells like "protocol downgrade attack".
> > > This would undermine the idea of a crypto policy.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Feather Lin wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
> Thank you! (謝謝！） Yes the 歡迎光臨 is mean welcome the people.
Welcome!
Feel free to check out the methods to contact the 中文 user group.[1]
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zh
-robin 李瑞彬
>
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:13 AM Adam Samalik
wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Valentini
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:58 AM
On Friday, 01 June 2018 at 12:53, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have two suggestions:
> >
> > - on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force
> > grub menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-726fd94741
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66248645f7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-92bfc6b328
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19cd645f2a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
76 matches
Mail list logo
