On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices.
Will this work with virt-manager too? Currently, while aarch64 boots via
uEFI there, it seems that armv7 is only supported by manually specifying
a kernel and initrd.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set
the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible
default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many
specfiles still include an
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In a %files section of a specfile, the %defattr directive is used to set
> the default file ownership and permissions. RPM has provided a sensible
> default since version 4.4 (which predates FC6 and RHEL5), but very many
> specfiles
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/04/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-2.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49825
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597929
Bug ID: 1597929
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
>
>
> OK. I'll ask releng to merge on Monday.
>
>
Was it merged?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 12:57:41 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "JK" == Jan Kurik writes:
>
> JK> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DiscontinuePPC64
>
> This may be necessary, but it's sadly unfortunate as (so far as I can
> tell) it leaves us with only one big-endian architecture
I've been using this
https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker
which relies on this
https://github.com/lvc/abi-dumper
and it's the latter that stopped working and the former doesn't work
without it
--
GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar
Tox ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597276
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.18-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594219
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594050
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.16-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package
It has been done.
If you hit problems with automatic bytecompilation, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_usr_bin_python_into_separate_package#Effect_on_automatic_bytecompilation
If you hit problems
I asked on IRC and mboddu had a look; somehow the retirement didn't
automatically filter into the PDC (which keeps all sorts of metadata
about packages) and so nothing else in the system noticed. There were
sporadic problems with this in the past (which have been fixed for a
while) but a few
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597400
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594050
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.16-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597276
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529797
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
fusioninventory-agent-2.4.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-94a65fe084
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
= Proposed System Wide Change: ZRAM support for ARM images =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZRAMforARMimages
Owner(s):
* Peter Robinson
Enable ZRAM for swap on ARMv7 and aarch64 pre generated images to
improve performance and reliability on ARM Single Board Computers such
a the
= Proposed System Wide Change: ZRAM support for ARM images =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZRAMforARMimages
Owner(s):
* Peter Robinson
Enable ZRAM for swap on ARMv7 and aarch64 pre generated images to
improve performance and reliability on ARM Single Board Computers such
a the
= Proposed System Wide Change: uEFI for ARMv7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/uEFIforARMv7
Owner(s):
* Peter Robinson
Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices.
== Detailed description ==
Currently ARMv7 uses extlinux to boot the kernel on ARMv7. This has
= Proposed System Wide Change: uEFI for ARMv7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/uEFIforARMv7
Owner(s):
* Peter Robinson
Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices.
== Detailed description ==
Currently ARMv7 uses extlinux to boot the kernel on ARMv7. This has
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-20180703git4404d03.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The submission deadline for System Wide Change Proposals of Fedora 29
[1] has been reached today (on July 3rd).
From July 4th, please schedule your System Wide Changes for a next
release (Fedora 30).
The deadline for Self Contained Change Proposals is planned on July 24th.
In case you'll need
The submission deadline for System Wide Change Proposals of Fedora 29
[1] has been reached today (on July 3rd).
From July 4th, please schedule your System Wide Changes for a next
release (Fedora 30).
The deadline for Self Contained Change Proposals is planned on July 24th.
In case you'll need
On 07/03/2018 10:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenLDAPwithoutNonthreadedLibraries
OpenLDAP will not ship non-threaded version of libldap. Instead,
libldap will be built with the same
= Proposed System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenLDAPwithoutNonthreadedLibraries
Owner(s):
* Matus Honek
OpenLDAP will not ship non-threaded version of libldap. Instead,
libldap will be built with the same threading support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597458
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Note from Change Wrangler: This Change Proposal requires mass rebuild.
However, two weeks ago (June 19th), we have already passed the
deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild. I will leave the
decision whether this Change proposal is accepted or not to RelEng and
FESCo teams.
=
Note from Change Wrangler: This Change Proposal requires mass rebuild.
However, two weeks ago (June 19th), we have already passed the
deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild. I will leave the
decision whether this Change proposal is accepted or not to RelEng and
FESCo teams.
=
= Proposed System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenLDAPwithoutNonthreadedLibraries
Owner(s):
* Matus Honek
OpenLDAP will not ship non-threaded version of libldap. Instead,
libldap will be built with the same threading support
31 matches
Mail list logo
