Fedora testing-20180723.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.18 to 0.35 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/259329#downloads Current test data:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-07-23 - 87% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/07/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.13-20180722git345221c.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180722.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180721.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180722.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 98 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 430.93 KiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20180722.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/138 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180721.n.0): ID: 259392 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/259392 ID:

[Bug 1607193] New: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607193 Bug ID: 1607193 Summary: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-SimpleTable Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] New limited arch package "libdnet"

Hello all, as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages I would like to notify you about my intention to add the libdnet package to EPEL 7 to cover ppc64 and ppc64le architectures, which are not covered with that package by RHEL 7 (RHEL 7 just covers aarch64 and

Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): error: Installed (but

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On 07/21/2018 02:54 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Jul 15, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On 07/20/2018 11:15 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20.7.2018 19:56, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 07/20/2018 03:55 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> >>> >>> I actually already filed the respective bugs: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591225 >>> >>> There is even PR: >>> >>>

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 07/17/2018 04:35 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > We want to keep them and we are able to maintain Python 2 for them > (well, we would very much prefer to have them ported to Python 3 but we > realize it's not always happening.) Well, if something is broken in python2, breaking one of

Non-responsive maintainer - Daniel Kopeček

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! According Non-responsive Maintainer Policy I'm asking the maintainer to respond and resolve issues with packages spdlog and json. RHBZ (spdlog): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468817 RHBZ (json):

Re: diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

I changed the spec file [1] but it still fails on rawhide [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaruntime/diorite.spec [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28522155 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self Introduction: Kairui Song

On 07/13/2018 02:33 AM, Kairui Song wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on submitting a package, it's my first package. So I want to > give a brief self-introduction here. > > My name is Kairui Song, I'm a software engineer at Red Hat, have been a > Red Hat employee for two years, and start

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

A little update: upon FAS misc suggestion I started trying to comment from line 5 to 15 of file https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/darktable-2.4.x/tools/basecurve/CMakeLists.txt and then the previous error seems to be disappeared.

Re: Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 08:45 +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > 2018-07-17 0:38 GMT+02:00 Miro Hrončok : > > On 16.7.2018 21:54, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > > I fixed some of these audio packages, prefixing waf calls with > > > %{__python2} macro. You have to BR python2-rpm-macros or python2- > > >

Re: Build failures of packages which use waf as build system

i changed the spec file [1] but it still fails on rawhide [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/nuvolaruntime/diorite.spec [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28522155 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned many packages in Fedora

Hi, I want to reduce my current package maintenance, hence orphaned below packages now Following packages have no bugs open against them and also not seen any upstream release since imported in Fedora few years ago aldusleaf-crimson-text-fonts almas-mongolian-title-fonts cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts

Re: diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

Are you already read this https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TIT5YDEUODUBTDOE2CGL754DWV6655F5/#G7R54DGDCHNTXJLL6QDYCP53PNHUTWVK ? On 22/07/2018 13:43, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > i am trying to fix the FTBFS for diorite but i have no success. >

diorite: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

Hi, i am trying to fix the FTBFS for diorite but i have no success. koji [1] build process failed with: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.1zlcEa + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd diorite-4.12.0 + waf configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --novaladoc Traceback (most

Re: Fedora crda To wireless-regdb Upgrade

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:53:51AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-07-20 20:47 GMT+02:00 John W. Linville : > [...] > > QUESTIONS > > > > Are there reasons to oppose the Obsolete/Provides upgrade path from > > crda to wireless-regdb? +1 to the upgrade. > Would it be desirable to require

Python Bundled Wheels package

Hi Pythonistas and Fedora packagers. Recently I've realized we bundle too much wheels with our pythons + virtualenv package. That is unfortunate: * we don't build those. stricly seeking, it's just a zip with python files in it, yet this is not permitted in Fedora * we only sometimes list

[rpms/rt] New Commits To "rpms/rt" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/rt on branch master, which you are following: 8e8ad3ace6aaf06ccddeebef6a66df81b35c26edRalf CorsépiusCleanup. To view more about the commits, visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/commits/master

[Bug 1604806] rt-4.4.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604806 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[rpms/rt] New Commits To "rpms/rt" (master)

The following commits were pushed to the repo rpms/rt on branch master, which you are following: 64a8ed05a3a6d3839d0e72b32d108b56d946404dRalf CorsépiusUpdate to rt-4.4.3. Modernize spec. BR: perl(File::Find), perl(HTTP::Status). Rebase patches. To view more about the commits, visit: