poppler soname bump in rawhide

2018-08-13 Thread Marek Kasik
Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes. Unfortunatel

Re: fedora-messaging for Copr - what do you need?

2018-08-13 Thread Jeff Johnson
There is no reason why a connection to an AMQP broker cannot be opened and carried into a chroot that has networking disabled: rpm installs already perform chroot's carrying multiple open Berkeley DB fdnos into the chroot. ___ devel mailing list -- deve

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

2018-08-13 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-08-14 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

Re: Resurrecting an old review request

2018-08-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 08:56:31PM +0300, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote: > Hi! > > After a break I've gotten back to Fedora packaging. Two years ago I > took an attempt at packaging foma (https://github.com/mhulden/foma) > but I never finished the work. I think I've now fixed all of the > issues pointe

Re: how to track downstream these days

2018-08-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 08:36:56PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi list, > > how does one track downstream packages these days? The instructions on > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tracking_downstream_packages > do not seem to work anymore, and neither does their dnf flavour: > > $ sudo dnf re

Re: Self Introduction: filbranden

2018-08-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:25 PM Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself. > My name is Filipe. I currently live in California, though I'm > originally from Brazil. I have been using Fedora and other distros in > that fam

Re: Self Introduction: filbranden

2018-08-13 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
- Original Message - > From: "Filipe Brandenburger" > To: "Fedora Devel" > Cc: "Petr Holášek" > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 8:10:33 PM > Subject: Self Introduction: filbranden > > Hi everyone! > > I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself. > My name is F

Re: fedora-messaging for Copr - what do you need?

2018-08-13 Thread Michal Novotny
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:33 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > As part of migration of fedmsg from ZMQ to AMQP, I would like to revisit > what is Copr sending to fedmsg. > > Right now we are sending: > > 'build.start': { > 'what': "build start: user:{user} copr:{copr}" \ >

Re: fedora-messaging for Copr - what do you need?

2018-08-13 Thread Michal Novotny
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:52 AM Jeff Johnson wrote: > Changing Fedora infrastructure to use AMQP brings up a different usage > case. > > Build systems tend to eventually invoke rpmbuild to do the actual build. > > Would you like rpmbuild to, say, send time stamped progress messages > directly th

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Rex Dieter
Robert Marcano wrote: > On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Robert Marcano wrote: >> >>> On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: > And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should > be Recommends and not Requires Y

how to track downstream these days

2018-08-13 Thread Julian Sikorski
Hi list, how does one track downstream packages these days? The instructions on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tracking_downstream_packages do not seem to work anymore, and neither does their dnf flavour: $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires `sudo dnf repoquery --provides zlib` Ostatnio sprawdzono

Fedora Rawhide-20180813.n.0 compose check report

2018-08-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180812.n.0): ID: 265345 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/265345 ID: 265355 Test:

Self Introduction: filbranden

2018-08-13 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi everyone! I'm a new packager in Fedora project, so I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Filipe. I currently live in California, though I'm originally from Brazil. I have been using Fedora and other distros in that family for close to 20 years now, for fun and profit, starting with Red Hat L

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180813.n.0 changes

2018-08-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180812.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180813.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 68 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.02 MiB Size of dropped packages

You can now test/use the crypto policy of future Fedora releases

2018-08-13 Thread Tomas Mraz
The current [0] crypto-policies in Rawhide contain additional policy named as NEXT. You can switch the system to it as root via command: update-crypto-policies --set NEXT The difference to the current DEFAULT policy is that TLS versions 1.0 and 1.1 are disabled and the minimum key length of RSA k

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Robert Marcano
On 08/13/2018 10:20 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 15:34, Robert Marcano wrote: [..] > Yes, read your other email about headers and Requires.private. On > another email I found another example, where no headers are referenced > (copy the relevant info here), but I don't think it is easy to detect > those cases only if pkgcon

Re: Intent to retire python-svgwrite

2018-08-13 Thread Julien Enselme
Hi Robert, Any progress on becoming an approved packager? It's just to know what I should do with the package. -- Julien Enselme http://www.jujens.eu/ On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Julien Enselme wrote: > I'll gladly give you access. What is your fedora username? > > The repo: https://src

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you thin

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Robert Marcano
On 08/13/2018 08:34 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Robert Marcano
On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should be Recommends and not Requires You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to suppo

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Rex Dieter
Robert Marcano wrote: > On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Robert Marcano wrote: >> >>> And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should >>> be Recommends and not Requires >> >> You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to support that. > > Example belo

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Robert Marcano
On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure they’

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Igor Gnatenko wrote on 08/13/2018 06:13 PM: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet < dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote: Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200: I've submitted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_librari

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On su, 12 elo 2018, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM Robert Marcano wrote: Greetings. Hello, Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. For example, someone developin

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Graham Leggett
On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: > Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make > developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure they’re not needed? Regards, Graham —

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet < dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200: > > I've submitted > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries > > to improve the situation. > > I

Perl dependencies of KDE libraries

2018-08-13 Thread Owen Taylor
Hi Rex, As part of my Flaptak efforts, I've been looking what libraries and other packages are used by our most popular applications and I noticed that all applications using KDE libraries are pulling in a pile of perl packages. As far as I can tell, this is only because of the two scripts: /usr

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

2018-08-13 Thread Dominique Martinet
Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200: > I've submitted > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_pulling_dependencies_for_static_libraries > to improve the situation. I've posted on the other overlinking thread about pkgconfig and got corrected that Requires.private is