Il giorno mer 22 ago 2018 alle ore 21:53 Ben Cotton
ha scritto:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error
>
> == Summary ==
> The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot
> policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an
> ambiguo
iniparser SONAME version bump from 0 to 1 since 4.1.
All packages depends on iniparser should be rebuilt:
- cava
- spindown
- ubridge
robin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users.
> Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other
> modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented,
> such modules could also be used as build dependencies for
W dniu 30.08.2018 o 21:51, Julian Sikorski pisze:
> Hi list,
>
> mame-0.201-1.fc30 has failed to build on x86_64, i686 and arm. On each
> of those a different, but unusual build issue has occurred:
> - on i686 the linker failed with can not read symbols: memory exhausted
> - on arm with a ton of i
Hi list,
mame-0.201-1.fc30 has failed to build on x86_64, i686 and arm. On each
of those a different, but unusual build issue has occurred:
- on i686 the linker failed with can not read symbols: memory exhausted
- on arm with a ton of issues like errors encountered processing file
obj/Release/gene
On 30.8.2018 20:30, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 08/22/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error
== Summary ==
The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot
policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an
On 08/22/2018 11:58 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error
>
> == Summary ==
> The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot
> policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an
> ambiguous python shebang, such
Hi
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:13 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the
> dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service
> file, breaking almost everything.
>
> Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the
> dbus.sock
> On 29.8.2018 20:05, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Try contacting the maintainers fo the dependent packages directly?
Well, I just did it this morning, let's see if there's some feedback. Otherwise
I'll just proceed with the retirement process of the package.
Cheers
Johannes
Hi All,
Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the
dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service
file, breaking almost everything.
Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the
dbus.socket file expects a matching dbus.service, not
dbus-daemon.service.
So e
On Thursday, August 30, 2018 1:15:19 PM CEST Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and
> > that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive.
> >
> I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client pro
On 2018-08-29, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> While the split is reasonable, this change has IMHO one big flaw and
> that is the change of the names, which are not really intuitive.
>
I second that. I'd rather see postgresql-client providing the libpq
library. It's symmetric to postgresql-server name.
-- P
Hi, Ben,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Changes as Markdown files
>
> This does address the history, but it loses the metadata aspect that
> makes the current process clunky. Being able to script against the
> metadata fields eliminates trying to parse the wiki text and ho
On 23.8.2018 02:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
There is a cluster of PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-behave/pull-request/2
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-docx/pull-request/2
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-parse_type/pull-request/2
That allows us to drop python2-beh
On Monday, August 27, 2018 9:28:32 PM CEST Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> > all packages required already in fedora, all you need todo is update
> > pgadmin4 spec and get it approved.
>
>
> First, I've never used any of the online tools (e.g. koji, etc) for
> building a RPM before. I would need som
15 matches
Mail list logo