On ke, 19 syys 2018, Björn Persson wrote:
Michal Toman wrote:
Exit codes with top bit set to 1 (IOW higher than 127) usually mean
unhandled signal. In your case 141 & 127 = 13 (or 141 - 128 = 13 if you
want) indicating the app got SIGPIPE and died on it.
That's a good point. And apparently no
On ke, 19 syys 2018, Björn Persson wrote:
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Can you provide output from
export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr
klist -A
kinit
fedpkg build
?
The log is attached. I tried it twice as Tony Nelson suggested. The
first attempt failed as usual, but the second attempt was
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-09-20 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-09-20 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/20/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180919gitb4164cc.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi, folks!
So, Beta RC4 is out there and being tested (thanks for all the testing
so far). There is an RC5 coming too: here's why.
We haven't found any blockers in RC4 yet, but we did find several not-
quite-blockers that seemed bad. First of all, the Silverblue (formerly
known as Atomic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631115
Bug ID: 1631115
Summary: perl-Data-Dumper-2.172 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-Dumper
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631113
Bug ID: 1631113
Summary: perl-Devel-PPPort-3.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Devel-PPPort
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 07:58 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging
> a
> week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted
> to
> the list, and I don't know why...)
>
> Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 07:58 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging a
> week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted to
> the list, and I don't know why...)
>
> Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in
Hi, (this is a 4th retry, now trying devel as first try to packaging a
week ago says held by moderator, but doesn't seem to have been posted to
the list, and I don't know why...)
Audacity has had the following as part of rpm spec in the %configure
section:
%configure \
Michal Toman wrote:
> Exit codes with top bit set to 1 (IOW higher than 127) usually mean
> unhandled signal. In your case 141 & 127 = 13 (or 141 - 128 = 13 if you
> want) indicating the app got SIGPIPE and died on it.
That's a good point. And apparently no message is printed for the PIPE
signal.
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Can you provide output from
>
> export KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stderr
> klist -A
> kinit
> fedpkg build
>
> ?
The log is attached. I tried it twice as Tony Nelson suggested. The
first attempt failed as usual, but the second attempt was successful.
Björn Persson
[beorn@tag
Björn Persson wrote:
> Tony Nelson wrote:
> > No, but googling "kinit 141" leads to
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537866
> > which suggests trying the kinit command twice in a row.
>
> I would think I must have tried at least twice the first time I had
> this problem, but at
At today's EPEL Steering Committee, we went over the current Python3x
packages and the work to move to a newer version than Python34. We
decided to propose 2018-10-16 to be a day long virtual hackfest
(activity day?) where a newer spec files for packages are updated to
an agreed upon Python
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 00:02 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> I don't have the time to continue maintaining this package,
> unfortunately. Please get in touch if you want to maintain the
> package and I'll hand it over to you.
I use coan fairly regularly, it seems to get a lot of things right
The EPEL Steering Committee will be holding weekly meetings on
Wednesdays at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. The agenda will be updated
and viewed at
https://gobby.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/epel-meeting-next
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 282811 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282811
ID: 282821 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL:
On 09/14/2018 07:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status
> of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID
> device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be
> a blocker for Beta, many of the
Dear all,
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-09-20 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630976
Bug ID: 1630976
Summary: EPEL-7 branch for perl-Data-TreeDumper?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-TreeDumper
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
Dear all,
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 29 Beta release will be held on
Thursday, 2018-09-20 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more
information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting
View the meeting on Fedocal at
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 21:31 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> How do I propose
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release?
It cannot be one, as that is not a release-blocking image - none of the
vagrant boxes are.
But in process terms, Zbigniew is correct. All
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 29 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:39 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:31:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > How do I propose
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7814 as a blocker for the F29 release?
>
> My suggestion would be to open a bug in bugzilla,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629611
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
the live images, for instance, go to this URL:
> >
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=closed=flat=createLiveMedia=-id
> >
> > and look for tasks with the string 'Fedora-29-20180919.0' in them (*not*
> > 'Fedora-29-20180919.n.0', those wo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629611
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI
rom Koji a
> little sooner than that, for anyone who wants to get a head start on
> testing; to find the live images, for instance, go to this URL:
>
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=closed=flat=createLiveMedia=-id
>
> and look for tasks with the string 'Fedora-2
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:12:44PM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:27:04 AM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji,
> > or our Koji builders, but:
> >
> > $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30
Hello All!
OK, no objections so far so I'm going to retire it soon.
2018-09-05 16:33 GMT+02:00 Peter Lemenkov :
> Hello All!
> With recent erlang-js build there is no more packages dependent on
> mozjs24 in F-29 and Rawhide. It wasn't build successfully since Fedora
> 26 and no longer updated
Works fine here with
$ rpm -q koji
koji-1.16.1-2.fc29.noarch
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 11:27:04 AM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji,
> or our Koji builders, but:
>
> $ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch
> Downloading:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630391
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-CPP-0.75-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb0dd6c1b7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-CPP-0.75-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-78d1770875
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-CPP-0.75-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-90fb5507ec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630742
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
I don't know if this is a problem with this specific version of koji,
or our Koji builders, but:
$ koji download-build nbdkit-1.7.3-1.fc30 --arch=x86_64 --arch=noarch
Downloading: nbdkit-ext2-plugin-1.7.3-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
2018-09-19 10:14:21,056 [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630391
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630743
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630742
Bug 1630742 depends on bug 1630743, which changed state.
Bug 1630743 Summary: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.24 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630743
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630742
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1630743
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630743
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1630742
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-eb4edad894
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-607ed51bf2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ebfbe2e3ef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180916.n.0):
ID: 282135 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/282135
ID: 282169 Test: x86_64 universal
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 281934 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/281934
ID: 281936 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630743
Bug ID: 1630743
Summary: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630742
Bug ID: 1630742
Summary: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.28 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630741
Bug ID: 1630741
Summary: perl-Inline-CPP-0.75 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Inline-CPP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630740
Bug ID: 1630740
Summary: Upgrade perl-Devel-Cover to 1.31
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Devel-Cover
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630736
Bug ID: 1630736
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.31 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi,
On 19-09-18 02:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 18:57 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 9/18/18 3:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
But is this bugginess worth a FE to try and get -58 onto the Beta?
Lots of users will install
(*not*
'Fedora-29-20180919.n.0', those would be nightlies, which don't have
the extra fixed packages).
Thanks a lot, everyone!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-09-19 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is a meeting to go over the following items:
1. Regular meeting times
2. Python3x build VFAD
3. ???
58 matches
Mail list logo