On 1.10.2018 23:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I
On 1.10.2018 19:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 18:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
Notification time stamped 2018-10-02 03:25:57 UTC
From 7a4275162d474c02e7e19e46e193cf762003d413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 02 2018 03:08:19 +
Subject: Update to 0.10.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 82ba2c1..d828f2e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
Notification time stamped 2018-10-02 03:08:28 UTC
From 7a4275162d474c02e7e19e46e193cf762003d413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 02 2018 03:08:19 +
Subject: Update to 0.10.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 82ba2c1..d828f2e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 287534 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287534
ID: 287551 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635068
Bug ID: 1635068
Summary: perl-BSON-v1.8.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-BSON
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 16:52 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen <
> fedora201...@nuclearsunshine.com> wrote:
> > The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not
> > addressing
> > its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting
> >
OLD: Fedora-29-20180929.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages:11.81 MiB
> "JF" == John Florian writes:
JF> I would agree with that, but I read the announcement as if this
JF> *was* finished.
The announcement was unfortunately made before things were in what I
would consider to be a "releasable" condition. Currently the Wiki pages
continue to exist and have not
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> I'm wondering if it was a good idea to use asciidoc in the first
NG> place. Unlike reStructuredText, asciidoc implementations seem to be
NG> in very poor shape.
It's what the documentation team has chosen. I don't think the
packaging committee would want to
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:03 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
>
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> > converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
> Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
> a "best
On 2018-10-01 17:04, Björn Persson wrote:
John Florian wrote:
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
I would agree with that, but I read the
l;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including
l;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including
John Florian wrote:
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
> they now need to go to docs.fp.o?
Not until the conversion is finished, in my opinion.
Björn Persson
pgpChXjsJJFLd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
FWIW, We *could* use the asciidoctor / asciidoc plugin for jekyll.
Both asciidoctor and
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
> converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
Maybe I'll try that next time I have some free time. This is giving me
a "best viewed with Netscape Navigator" feeling
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:29 PM Stephen wrote:
> The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing
> its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a
> patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in
> some instances.
I'm around,
On 18.9.2018 21:57, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 18.9.2018 21:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Is anyone willing to look into automating this? Write a spec
depython2izer?
This usually means:
- removing python2- and python- BRs
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:59:21PM -0400, John Florian wrote:
> On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
> And conversely, shouldn't
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling
> viewers they
The maintainer for Plymouth, Ray Strode (halfline), is not addressing
its bugs on RHBZ (one response all year on a single bug, accepting a
patch), including showstopper bugs that are preventing boot entirely in
some instances.
Per
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 16:27, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for
On 2018-10-01 10:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think we instead should make sure that all docs under docs.fp.o
contain good links to those pages on the wiki.
And conversely, shouldn't
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines be telling viewers
they now need to go to
Indeed, asciidoctor works a bit better than asciidoc does but still
converts quickly. It's actually in the "rubygem-asciidoctor" package.
- J<
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 1.10.2018 20:00, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch
tl;dr: All Fedora Infrastructure systems will be updated and rebooted
over this week.
Systems that can be done outside of the planned outage.
2018-10-01 21:00 UTC Staging and downloads
2018-10-02 throughout the 'day' single proxies will be updated/rebooted.
2018-10-03 production systems including
> "BP" == Björn Persson writes:
BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
BP> fixed I suppose?)
I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch instead of using
a container. I would hope
On 09/30/2018 07:25 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30.9.2018 14:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Got this when I run `fedpkg new-sources`.
>>
>> $ fedpkg --release master new-sources wheel-0.32.0.tar.gz
>> Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns
>> status 403
>>
>> What do i
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Seems that podman is broken (it is also broken for tibbs in some other
> way), this is really sad. Just wondering which version of fedora you are
> running and is there really no package called "slirp4netns" (I can see it
> in F28/F29/F30).
This was on Fedora 27. So one
On 1.10.2018 18:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2
Hi,
naive noob question: Is it possible to execute scripts with taskotron to
download 3rd-party dependencies e.g. with pip from PyPi? I tend to say that
it's not worth to package simple test libraries with all the dependency hell
behind. Those dependencies are not required for normal runtime
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 18:04:56 +0300, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> Good to know.
> A good article post at Fedora Magazin will be more useful.
Thanks! I intend to write a post on the community blog but I'm not sure
if NeuroFedora is mature enough to advertise to users on the magazine
just
On 1.10.2018 17:55, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2 and python3 subpackages.
But recently it
Meeting started by zbyszek at 15:00:17 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-01/fesco.2018-10-01-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
* init process (zbyszek, 15:00:20)
* #1974 Problematic blocker for F29: dnf 'offline' module
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> What packages? And where are they depending on it?
I believe the underlying issue is that previously the Fedora
python-matplotib package produced both python2 and python3 subpackages.
But recently it dropped support for python2.
What I don't
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 11:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 1.10.2018 17:32, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
> >
> > MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
> > MH> heads up e-mails.
> >
> > So that nobody is confused by this, the
On 1.10.2018 17:32, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
MH> heads up e-mails.
So that nobody is confused by this, the python2-matplotlib package was
previously an EPEL-only stub package maintained by me
> "MH" == Miro Hrončok writes:
MH> I've orphaned python2-matplotlib. Nobody replied to my previous
MH> heads up e-mails.
So that nobody is confused by this, the python2-matplotlib package was
previously an EPEL-only stub package maintained by me that existed so
packagers could simply
Good to know.
A good article post at Fedora Magazin will be more useful.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:24 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/NeuroFedora
>
> I've recently resurrected the NeuroFedora SIG. Many thanks to Igor and
> the others who'd worked on it in
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:47:37AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
>
> AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
> AS> such as these also be migrated?
>
> Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
>
> "AS" == Ankur Sinha writes:
AS> Thank you---that's really neat! Would other relatively static pages
AS> such as these also be migrated?
Those are outside the scope of the packaging committee. They could
certainly be migrated in a similar fashion, but they wouldn't live in
the packaging
problem solved for my by adding the rsa key in paguera,
now i have access in fedorapeople also.
https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/first_steps.html
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
otaylor commented on the pull-request: `Make builds for inclusion in an
application Flatpak work` that you are following:
``
It may be a little confusing: why do we need to handle mixed environements with
some perl modules in /app and some in /usr? This is for build time in the
buildroot of a
I'm in meetings all day today and will be unable to attend the FESCo
meeting. I'll attempt to vote in all the tickets in today's agenda.
--
Jared Smith
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:09 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be
otaylor opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are
following:
``
Make builds for inclusion in an application Flatpak work
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-01 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
> On 1. Oct 2018, at 12:00, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> * Joseph D. Wagner [01/10/2018 02:47] :
>>
>> Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
>
> Folks, when you're asking us if anyone knows how to contact the
* Joseph D. Wagner [01/10/2018 02:47] :
>
> Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
Folks, when you're asking us if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer,
you might want to consider actually giving us his name
Per policy for non-responsive maintainers
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers)
There has been an outstanding update request since March 24, 2018.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560212
Joseph D. Wagner
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> As directed by:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CI/Tests
>
> I tried to add a test to libguestfs dist-git:
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs/blob/master/f/tests/tests.yml
>
> It's very simple initially. It
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 32/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180924.n.2):
ID: 287032 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287032
ID: 287035 Test:
Hello,
during rebase of rubygem-net-ssh to 5.0.2, I've decided to exclude *.pem file,
which is, AFAIK, used for testing purposes only.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-net-ssh/pull-request/4
--
Pavel Valena
Software Engineer, Red Hat
Brno, Czech Republic
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:24 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> > > If you find any error or would like to change something,
54 matches
Mail list logo
