No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in updates-20181102.0):
ID: 304929 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/304929
ID: 304930 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso
Bug report filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645828
Luya
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 2018-11-03 8:46 p.m., Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> While scratch build LuxCoreRender, I hit an endless loop of "DUP FUNXC"
> using rpmbuild and koji. It appears a bug on rpm as highlighted on
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30651816.
>
> Can someone verify with the attached
Hi!
My name is Daniel, and I'd love to help out the Fedora project in some
manner. Been a Fedora user on and off since Fedora 1 (used RH 9 back in the
day), and I've been coding with Python for about a decade now--things like
bioinformatics software, analysis pipelines, and automation--and
While scratch build LuxCoreRender, I hit an endless loop of "DUP FUNXC"
using rpmbuild and koji. It appears a bug on rpm as highlighted on
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30651816.
Can someone verify with the attached spec file and what will be the
solution?
Luya
# [Fedora]
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
147 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
37 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6bc3a525a2
libmad-0.15.1b-26.el6
3
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
147 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
98 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
On 2018-11-03 3:13 p.m., Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> Thanks. The suggestion worked. Another question is how to apply a patch
> on this example
>
> Source0:
> https://github.com/%{name}/LuxCore/archive/luxcorerender_v%{version}.tar.gz
> Source1:
>
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 11:41 PM Alain Vigne wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
> TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29.
>
> Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when I
> want to login to my Gnome session :(
>
> The boot is OK till the gdm
On 03/11/2018 22:50, Alain Vigne wrote:
Hi everyone
TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29.
Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen
when I want to login to my Gnome session :(
The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I
On 2018-11-03 10:49 a.m., Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> As explained in my previous mail this is solved by passing -DPYTHON_V=3 to
> cmake. Actually %{python3_pkgversion} would be better:
>
> - Use BuildRequires: boost-devel instead of static and add the PYTHON_V=%
> {python3_pkgversion}
Hi everyone
TLDR; I had a working Wayland Gnome Desktop in f28. Not anymore with f29.
Yesterday, I "dnf upgrade" my f28 to f29 ... to find a black screen when I
want to login to my Gnome session :(
The boot is OK till the gdm login screen, but when I enter my password, the
screen turns black,
I just orphaned whole the compiz stack.
- compiz
- compiz-plugins-main
- compiz-plugins-extra
- compiz-plugins-experimental
- compiz-manager
- compizconfig-python
- compiz-bcop
- emerald
- emerald-themes
- fusion-icon
- ccsm
- simple-ccsm
I don't use those packages for myself any more and i
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to F29, yum is one of the
> packages it wants to remove. Is it safe to remove yum these days?
>
Yes. Things pretty much don't use yum anymore.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Doing a 'dnf autoremove' after upgrading to F29, yum is one of the
packages it wants to remove. Is it safe to remove yum these days?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On vendredi 2 novembre 2018 21:34:01 CET Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers. The build encountered an issue due to the use
> of boost-static (for some strange reason, boost-devel will not be
> detected). I put the SRPM in COPR for testing:
>
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 20:26:29 +0530, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> I am taking this.
Thanks Manas. Until we get you sponsored to the packagers group, you can
only do unofficial reviews. So, you cannot approve the package at the
moment. I welcome the unofficial review, of course :)
--
Thanks,
Hi all.
I'm going to update HDF to the release 4.2.14 on f29+.
If your need to test it before, this is the scratch build just done on
fc30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30641568
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key:
On 03.11.18 16:11, Richard Shaw wrote:
[...]
Why is there a difference? What is the significance of the appended
(openmpi-x86_64)?
The appended (openmpi-x86_64) is neccessary to distinguish between the
openmpi libmpi.so library from the mpich one.
Actually I wonder whether this is
I've been working on getting a good build of FreeCAD 0.17 in Fedora (long
story) and I was finally able to get a good scratch build on Rawhide so I
decided to do a local mock build for Fedora 28 so I could actually test the
package...
As expected it built fine but I can't install it due to a
I am taking this.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018, 8:20 PM Ankur Sinha Here is another package that needs review. Happy to swap a review for
> it too.
>
> python-duecredit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Regards,
>
> Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
>
>
Here is another package that needs review. Happy to swap a review for
it too.
python-duecredit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description:
Thanks for advice I wrote to Link. He answered that will glad to take
the package and opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645675.
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:01:02 +0100
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On jeudi 1 novembre 2018 16:47:03 CET Ivan Romanov wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Seems
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 05:38:52 -, Raphael Groner wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
Hi Raphael,
> I could look into your review requests later.
>
> Maybe we can do a review swap with python-slacker and slack-cleaner?
> Currently, I am working on both of them but not yet finished to have
> it ready for
24 matches
Mail list logo
