Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0

2019-02-08 Thread Igor Gnatenko
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/beignet/ Last commits are from 2018/08 which is half year ago. I'd like to keep it, but try using master branch. BTW, somebody picked up llvm6 package, so I suppose he will fix all the bugs there :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 04:32 Tom Stellard On 01/28/2019 04:30 PM, To

Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0

2019-02-08 Thread Tom Stellard
On 01/28/2019 04:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/28/2019 02:47 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> It would be great if you would include list of dependent packages + >> their maintainers. >> > > Here is the list of dependent packages: > > Maintainers by package: > beignet ignatenkobrain

gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues

2019-02-08 Thread Patrick Diehl
Hi, I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic become one of the

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

2019-02-08 Thread Victor Rodriguez
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:11 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link > Nice ! Having more kernel options for Fedora users is really cool Apart from that , what could give a good boost in numerical apps might be this https://cle

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

2019-02-08 Thread Manas Mangaonkar
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Sorry for the really delayed reply. > > > Please take a look at my slides : > > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf > > from last y

Re: signing status

2019-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 2/8/19 11:11 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Looks like my build got caught up with this: > $ fedpkg build > Building freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30 for rawhide > Created task: 32666402 > Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32666402 ...snip... > And now I have a build without

Re: Lazarus 2.0 release - push to Rawhide or wait?

2019-02-08 Thread Artur Iwicki
I've made a COPR repo with Lazarus 2.0. If you can test Hedgewars using it, that'd be great. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/suve/lazarus-2.0/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

Re: Lazarus 2.0 release - push to Rawhide or wait?

2019-02-08 Thread Artur Iwicki
I've made a COPR repo so you can test if your packages build ok. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/suve/lazarus-2.0/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora C

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

2019-02-08 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 14:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 12:21 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Stephen John Smooge

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

2019-02-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 12:21 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 07:34, Fabio Val

Re: signing status

2019-02-08 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On pe, 08 helmi 2019, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. As you know from the other thread: * The mass rebuild happened and finished. * The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag (to make sure everything was signed). * In the middle of th

signing status

2019-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. As you know from the other thread: * The mass rebuild happened and finished. * The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag (to make sure everything was signed). * In the middle of the night our autosign box stopped processing

Games spin needs owner or will be dropped

2019-02-08 Thread Ben Cotton
The owner of the Games spin[1] has indicated[2] that he will not be able to maintain the Spin. If it is not adopted by Friday 15 February, I will request it be dropped from Fedora 30. If you would like to adopt this spin, please comment in the Pagure issue[3]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ga

Re: Orphaning pl (SWI Prolog)

2019-02-08 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-01-29, Petr Pisar wrote: > I have no interest in maintaining pl (SWI Prolog) package and thus I'm > going to orphan it. > Orphaned. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists