https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689776
Bug ID: 1689776
Summary: ack-2.26 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: ack
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Well I meant TeX docs with Sphinx.
> But obviously even that could be wrong, that's why I've used the words "think"
> and "much".
Ah, sorry for the misread. No, I think you are correct. Sphinx seems
to be used mostly to build HTML
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:49 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The clisp issue with s390x has been on my TODO list for a long time.
> I've been using most of my Fedora time to hunt down bugs that keep
> other packages from building at all. I seem to be reaching the end of
> that, at last, so I'll try to
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
215 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
86 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b43fdd19c3
vcftools-0.1.16-1.el7
23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> I've got a COPR based on the devel branch:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/fedora-review/
>
fedora-review 0.7.0 has been released and updates have been proposed for Fedora:
Fedora 30:
On 17/03/2019 18:55, Didier Fabert wrote:
My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since
a week now. What is the next step ?
I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or
packaging-guidelines[3].
Well it has passed review so now you need to request
On dimanche 17 mars 2019 19:55:19 CET Didier Fabert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since
> a week now. What is the next step ?
> I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or
> packaging-guidelines[3].
>
> Thanks for your
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:53 PM Didier Fabert wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since
> a week now. What is the next step ?
> I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or
> packaging-guidelines[3].
Have you done a "fedpkg
Hi all,
My package was reviewed and accepted[1], but the ticket is frozen since
a week now. What is the next step ?
I find nothing about this in package review process[2], or
packaging-guidelines[3].
Thanks for your reply.
Regards,
Didier.
[1]
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50286
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2019, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM John Reiser
> wrote:
> > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on
> > > rawhide are now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for
> > > all included executables and
I've orphaned the following nodejs packages. I do not have time to maintain
them any more.
nodejs-onetime
nodejs-oop
nodejs-opn
nodejs-pac-proxy-agent
nodejs-pac-resolver
nodejs-param-case
nodejs-parserlib
nodejs-pascal-case
nodejs-path-case
nodejs-path-exists
nodejs-pend
nodejs-pify
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190317.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.35 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.50
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 26/141 (x86_64), 4/24
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM John Reiser wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are
> > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included
> > executables and shared libraries.
> >
> > I'm not sure which change might be the cause
I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are now
triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables and
shared libraries.
I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 seems to
be a good candidate, since all my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689665
Bug ID: 1689665
Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.979 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpm
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687686
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689656
Bug ID: 1689656
Summary: perl-Net-SSH2-0.70 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-SSH2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688688
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1689654
Referenced Bugs:
Hi everybody,
I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are
now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included
executables and shared libraries.
I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0
seems to be a good candidate, since
Le dimanche 17 mars 2019 à 03:31 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
Hi,
>
> Numerous Golang packages are plagued with an issue caused when
> jchaloup uploaded Glide files. In a lot of case he has doubled the
> glide.yaml instead of adding the qlide.lock:
>
> Source1:glide.yaml
>
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
92 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-06b243cced
guacamole-server-1.0.0-1.el6
3
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
214 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
85 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b43fdd19c3
vcftools-0.1.16-1.el7
22
26 matches
Mail list logo