Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> So what? On Fedora /bin/sh is bash, and bash is a fine shell. I don't disagree. > All this nonsense of using dash for /bin/sh on Debian is IMO a > pointless bunch of make-work. I may complain about Debian on every occasion but I think dash is a much more sensible choice for /bin/sh, and that

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:19:48PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 12:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > [..] > > Like what exactly? E.g. all the -Wformat-security warnings are about cases > > where the format strings are constructed shortly before they are passed to > > the format

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday, March 22, 2019 10:41:23 AM CET Jakub Jelinek wrote: > If we in Fedora made -Werror=format-security warning default, then > one couldn't out of box build gcc nor many other projects. Not to mention > that it is extremely nasty, because if e.g. some project uses -Wno-format > for selected

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev
Hello, Tomasz Kłoczko. Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:05:55 + you wrote: > Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that .. > /bin/sh This is fine, because /bin/sh is a symbolic link to /usr/bin/bash on Fedora. I always use pushd/popd in my packages. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.or

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev
Hello, Kamil Dudka. Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:03:26 +0100 you wrote: > Enforcing -Werror=format-security in Fedora build system was a mistake. No. Enforcing -Werror=format-security is good choice. This helped maintainers to fix lots of potential security vulnerabilities in packages. -- Sincerely, Vi

Re: Multiple Review Requests for one source package?

2019-03-22 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Hello, Richard. On Wednesday, 20 March 2019 at 14:44, Richard Shaw wrote: > With PySide2 shiboken2, pyside2, and pyside2-tools are provided in one big > source archive. > > I'm working on packaging it[1] but the provided setuptools build system > calls CMake to perform builds and essentially fake

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> This is fine, because /bin/sh is a symbolic link to /usr/bin/bash on Fedora. > > I always use pushd/popd in my packages. It was also in the python packaging guidelines for py2+py3 builds. Dridi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday, March 22, 2019 12:25:28 PM CET Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > Hello, Kamil Dudka. > > Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:03:26 +0100 you wrote: > > > > Enforcing -Werror=format-security in Fedora build system was a mistake. > > > No. Enforcing -Werror=format-security is good choice. This helped > maintai

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 09:47, Jakub Jelinek wrote: [..] > > Just try to execute "update-po" target in gcc/ and you will see that > > only by this single command is possible to reduce gcc/po/ directory > > content by ~2MB (which is about 5% and that is only in one directory > > with translations)

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 01:03:19PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > > Just try to execute "update-po" target in gcc/ and you will see that > > > only by this single command is possible to reduce gcc/po/ directory > > > content by ~2MB (which is about 5% and that is only in one directory > > > with

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Beta is No-Go, today's Go/No-Go meeting is canceled

2019-03-22 Thread Ben Cotton
The compose that we decided yesterday to wait for failed, as has a subsequent compose attempt. Because there's no material change in status from yesterday's go/no-go meeting and we will not have a successful compose in place by the time of today's meeting, there is no value in repeating the Go/No-G

Orhpaning rubygem-jnunemaker-matchy

2019-03-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi everybody, I don't have any use for this package and nothing depends on it, therefore I orphaned the package. Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Cod

Fedora Rawhide-20190322.n.0 compose check report

2019-03-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 26/133 (x86_64), 3/24 (i

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190322.n.0 changes

2019-03-22 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190321.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190322.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 66.48 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

F31 System-Wide Change proposal: F31 Mass Python 2 Package Removal

2019-03-22 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F31_Mass_Python_2_Package_Removal == Summary == Python 2 is reaching end of life, and the current maintainers would like to orphan it. To prevent massive breakage, and to plan help with porting to Python 3, we will systematically track and remove packages t

Re: Packit is released: Packaging as a Service

2019-03-22 Thread Luke Hinds
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:44 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote: > We are pleased to announce the initial version of Packit. > > Packit makes it easy to bring and integrate your upstream projects > into Fedora, right now we are focused to bring upstream > releases into Fedora rawhide. You can use packit now

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Japheth Cleaver
On 3/21/2019 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: So what? On Fedora /bin/sh is bash, and bash is a fine shell. All this nonsense of using dash for /bin/sh on Debian is IMO a pointless bunch of make-work. Fedora has certainly made a lot of make-work projects over the last decade, under arguabl

Fedora 30 compose report: 20190322.n.0 changes

2019-03-22 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-30-20190321.n.0 NEW: Fedora-30-20190322.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:04 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote: > > On 3/21/2019 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > So what? On Fedora /bin/sh is bash, and bash is a fine shell. > > All this nonsense of using dash for /bin/sh on Debian is IMO a > pointless bunch of make-work. > > Fedora has certainl

New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

2019-03-22 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hello Fedora people, As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines have always been simply a « draft ». Part of the new Go SIG mission is to update ours best practices and tooling. As such, Nicolas Mailhot designed a new set of macros based on lua script to impr

Fedora 30-20190322.n.0 compose check report

2019-03-22 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 7/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 370098 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/370098 ID: 370104 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_sta

Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

2019-03-22 Thread Owen Taylor
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:04 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote: > > On 3/21/2019 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > So what? On Fedora /bin/sh is bash, and bash is a fine shell. > > All this nonsense of using dash for /bin/sh on Debian is IMO a > pointless bunch of make-work. > > Fedora has certainly

Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

2019-03-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 3/21/19 5:45 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8 >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a >>> >>> Would someon

[Test-Announce] 2019-03-25 @ ** 16:00 ** UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting

2019-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson
# F30 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2019-03-25 # Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta FEs to review, and proposed blockers may show up and need reviewing over the weekend, so let's have a Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-03-25 Fedora QA Meeting

2019-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't see anything important to discuss and we're mostly focused on Fedora 30 Beta validation at this time, but if you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

2019-03-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello Fedora people, > > As you may or may not know, currently applied Golang packaging guidelines > have always been simply a « draft ». Part of the new Go SIG mission is to > update ours best practices and tooling. As such, Nico

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

2019-03-22 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Friday, 22 March 2019 22:37:06 CET Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi Robert-André, > > It looks like you put a lot of work into this - I don't think I've > seen as comprehensive a documentation as this Draft is for any other > aspect of packaging (but well, Go packaging is notoriously difficult >

Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

2019-03-22 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:08 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Fixed, and I looked and asked upstream and this is fixed in sigul 1.0. > > So, hopefully we won't have to keep doing this too much longer. Thanks for digging into this! ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

2019-03-22 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 13:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote: [..] > > Sorry to say that but you just told that that you don't know enough about > > maintaining translation :P > > Sorry but you are wrong, it is unclear from what you are judging this. We > as > the GCC project have procedures to maintain tr