Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190414.0

2019-04-16 Thread Robert Fairley
An example of the diff between this and the previous released version (for x86_64) is: rpm-ostree db diff a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5c3ba5c9bedd59a9e76aa3e9924 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639 ostree diff commit old: a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5

Re: `dnf system-upgrade download` throws RuntimeError: TransactionItem not found for key: rtkit

2019-04-16 Thread Christian Stadelmann
This was fallout from an older bug in rtkit's rpm scripts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496. Thanks for the help! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o

`dnf system-upgrade download` throws RuntimeError: TransactionItem not found for key: rtkit

2019-04-16 Thread Christian Stadelmann
I am running in a reproducible traceback which happens during `dnf system-upgrade download` as reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700551. Does anyone know whether this will let me run into upgrade issues? ___ devel mailing list --

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc. > > > > > > It can download rawhide,

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

2019-04-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc. > > > > It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation > > Live etc), and e

Re: What is a PDC branch?

2019-04-16 Thread Christoph Junghans
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:21 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote: > > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my > > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch > > already exists". I reopened t

Re: Maintainer test instances

2019-04-16 Thread Richard Shaw
Also, pertinent to the main topic... Any chance of getting a EL 8 test instance? I'm working on getting some preliminary builds done in COPR but having some issues which are difficult to troubleshoot just with logs. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Maintainer test instances

2019-04-16 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:37:55 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting > access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at > https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up > running on hardware at Marist br

Stewardship SIG Meeting (2019-04-17; 17:00 UTC)

2019-04-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, Tomorrow we'll have the first meeting of the Stewardship SIG. Non-SIG-members are of course welcome to participate, as well. I considered both the final whenisgood survey results and the fedora meeting calendar to find a good spot for this week (which is a bit of a weird one due to

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190414.0

2019-04-16 Thread noreply
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190414.0 Commit(x86_64): 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639 Commit(aarch64): 4bf47dda2c658c4392fad85ed78cf563123dc7bd7a86dd644b2dfd252016d535 Commit(ppc64le): 03469a10666f0b65428974bd6

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

2019-04-16 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > > On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote > > > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon? I > packaged > > > it because I thought I was going to use it, but I en

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-16 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello, I updated 2 systems today to F30 using dnf system-upgrade. Ran into a few issues, but nothing major. I worked around them by removing the offending packages and then proceeding with the upgrade. Here are the bugs I filed: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700307: package May

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 19:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide > > > are > >

Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?

2019-04-16 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi Mikolaj > I thought of using names in format "stream-${name}-${stream}" (eg. stream-scala-2.10), but I can use "${name}-${stream}" (scala-2.10) format too - consistency between modules is more important than maintainer personal preferences. I just checked current modules' situation in f29 modu

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-04-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > > execu

Fedora 30-20190416.n.0 compose check report

2019-04-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 384350 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384350 ID: 384354 Test: x86_64 Worksta

Re: environment variables LANGUAGE

2019-04-16 Thread mcatanzaro
My first thought is accountsservice, check that first. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List G

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > executables and shared libraries. > > I'm not sure which change might be

Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide

2019-04-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:07 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables > and shared libraries. > > I'm not sure which change might be

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 11:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > > crashed five t

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

2019-04-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda > again, just because I

Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation

2019-04-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mardi 16 avril 2019 à 14:57 +, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the > workstation. It would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know > we've asked for this before... I have autostarted vms on my other_os workstation and it is very conv

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

2019-04-16 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Sunday, 14 April 2019 08:55:32 CEST Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote: > Hello > > I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images: > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64 > /images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box > ht

environment variables LANGUAGE

2019-04-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, from this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574222#c35 I have my locale all set to en_US.UTF-8 but LANGUAGE=en_US:pt , where LANGUAGE is set ? I can't find it Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor

Fedora 30 compose report: 20190416.n.0 changes

2019-04-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-30-20190415.n.2 NEW: Fedora-30-20190416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 80 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.77 MiB Size of dropped packages:245.61 MiB

Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation

2019-04-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the workstation. It would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know we've asked for this before... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-

FF v dnf needs-restarting

2019-04-16 Thread Bojan Smojver
I'm guessing most of you here probably observed this behaviour with dnf when FF is upgraded. Even after FF restarted, dnf needs-restarting reports that it needs restarting. Does that sound like a bug or is this somehow intentional? I'm seeing this in f29 and previous releases are the same. Once

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Williamson
oraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/30/ if you ask it for just 'branched' or 'rawhide' without any version information, it will find the latest successful pre-mirroring compose location for you, e.g. right now it would find: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compos

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Mat Booth
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:14, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > > rpm macros. > > > > Here is the documentation: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/mo

Re: Maintainer test instances

2019-04-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up running on hardware at Marist brothers college. there is also some info on how to use Jenkins for c

Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?

2019-04-16 Thread Jun Aruga
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:38 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Why? > > What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such? It's no problem. Rather it might be better in the point of view of "minimal necessary package branches for now". I thought it again. I considered below case

Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?

2019-04-16 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > > Hi, > > I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more. > > Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the > package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on > the list. > > # modul

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Adam Samalik
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:14 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > > rpm macros. > > > > Here is the documentation: > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images

2019-04-16 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:58 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > I already basically wrote this: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind Wow, very cool, looks comprehensive, thanks. I see it even downloads composed images from Koji. Jens ___ devel mailing lis

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:11 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > You can do something like: > > > > rpms: > > foo-bootstrap: > > name: foo > > bar: > > buildafter: > > - foo-bootstrap > > foo: > > buildafter: > > - bar > > > > How does f

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le 2019-04-16 15:06, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify rpm macros. Here is the documentation: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/definin

Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?

2019-04-16 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Why? What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such? On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:35 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, > > I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more. > > Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the > package branc

Module's package branch name to be aligned?

2019-04-16 Thread Jun Aruga
Hi, I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more. Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on the list. # module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package branch

Re: What is a PDC branch?

2019-04-16 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote: > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch > already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more > information, but they just got clo

Fedora 30 Final Freeze

2019-04-16 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi all, Today, April 16th 2019, is an important day on the Fedora 30 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final compos

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > rpm macros. > > Here is the documentation: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu > les/#_build_macros_optional > > H

libiptcdata long-term FTBFS

2019-04-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hi libiptcdata-maintainers, libiptcdata FTBFS for a long time. Please either fix it or oprhan the package if you don't have time to do it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604602 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Fedora Rawhide-20190416.n.0 compose check report

2019-04-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 13/146 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190416.n.0 changes

2019-04-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190413.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 18 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 194 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 41.32 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies

2019-04-16 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > You can do something like: > > rpms: > foo-bootstrap: > name: foo > bar: > buildafter: > - foo-bootstrap > foo: > buildafter: > - bar > How does foo.spec get to know that it should enable bootstrapping in foo-bootstrap component,

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers

2019-04-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15. 04. 19 18:52, Christopher wrote: If nobody picks up the ones by my name (nodejs-path-exists, nodejs-bluebird, nodejs-grunt-known-options), then I will probably have to orphan js-jquery, because it probably needs those for its build (I can't think of any other reason my name would be listed