Fedora Rawhide-20190515.n.1 compose check report

2019-05-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/146 (x86_64), 1/24 (i

Re: Fedora GPG keys

2019-05-15 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/15/19 11:33 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Can someone enlighten me what happened to: https://getfedora.org/keys/ ? There used to be GPG keys of Fedora, but now it just return 404. This was just brought up on the users list as well. It's being corrected.

Fedora GPG keys

2019-05-15 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Can someone enlighten me what happened to: https://getfedora.org/keys/ ? There used to be GPG keys of Fedora, but now it just return 404. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-15 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 07:51, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dear Jerry, > > Although I have no idea what xindy is, I enjoyed reading your analysis. > Thx for your insightful post. +1, great analysis and write-up! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.or

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16. 05. 19 v 7:58 Samuel Sieb napsal(a): > On 5/15/19 10:50 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 15. 05. 19 v 17:29 Dominique Martinet napsal(a): >>> Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very >>> recently: >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/c/7a654fc69c499b54f38543ca4

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/15/19 10:50 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 15. 05. 19 v 17:29 Dominique Martinet napsal(a): Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very recently: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/c/7a654fc69c499b54f38543ca40f765fbaf9bdf84 This was removed on my request, triggered

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dear Jerry, Although I have no idea what xindy is, I enjoyed reading your analysis. Thx for your insightful post. Vít Dne 16. 05. 19 v 3:45 Jerry James napsal(a): > I finally found some time to look at the xindy failure to build. > First, let me say that I've got a workaround for the problem,

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 15. 05. 19 v 17:29 Dominique Martinet napsal(a): > Michal Schorm wrote on Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:14:23PM +0200: >> Another possible cause came up my mind. >> >> Another package in the buildroot could have brought it as a >> dependency, but does not bring it anymore ? > Yeah, it used to come w

xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-15 Thread Jerry James
I finally found some time to look at the xindy failure to build. First, let me say that I've got a workaround for the problem, which resulted in the beautiful green colors in this xindy-enabled scratch build of texlive-base: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34877270 When the bu

Re: sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-15 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 5/15/19 3:09 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git trees. sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-05-16 16:00 UTC)

2019-05-15 Thread James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-05-16 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2019-05-16 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-05-16 1

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-05-15 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > > Kevin and Clement, thanks for the explanation. > > I am looking forward to seeing the final compose. > > > So, likely we haven't had a armv7 fedora 30 compose recently, and so no > one has updated it. The container sig would be the ones to ask h

orphaning bleachbit

2019-05-15 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
I intend to orphan bleachbit soon. If anyone is interested please let me know and I will transfer the package. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bleachbit Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel

sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-15 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git trees. sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access righ

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Michal Schorm
> Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very recently: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/c/7a654fc69c499b54f38543ca40f765fbaf9bdf84 Alright, I'm happy we found the cause and itś not something more severe. Thanks! -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services -

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Dominique Martinet
Michal Schorm wrote on Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:14:23PM +0200: > Another possible cause came up my mind. > > Another package in the buildroot could have brought it as a > dependency, but does not bring it anymore ? Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very recently: https://sr

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Michal Schorm
Another possible cause came up my mind. Another package in the buildroot could have brought it as a dependency, but does not bring it anymore ? -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat -- On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 5:08 PM Michal Schorm wrote: > > Hello folks >

Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-15 Thread Michal Schorm
Hello folks I maintain 'mariadb-connector-c' package, which build (amongst others) a plugin that utilizes kerberos authentication to the MariaDB database. Recently, this very plugin stopped building. Everything else stayed the same. The change appeared first after a commit that changes literally

rpmlint: shared-lib-without-dependency-information (parts of Python stdlib)

2019-05-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 05. 02. 19 19:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: I've just spotted these when working on Python 3.8.0a1. This happens on 3.7 as well since GCC 9: python3-debug.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/python3.7/lib-dynload/_contextvars.cpython-37dm-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-debug.x86_64

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190513.0

2019-05-15 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 5/15/19 8:25 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason why _all_ links below: > > https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/* > > are dead? > > I always get, e.g.: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /en/atomic/download/ was not found on this server. > Apache Server at getfedora.org Port

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190513.0

2019-05-15 Thread Sven Kieske
Hi, is there a reason why _all_ links below: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/* are dead? I always get, e.g.: Not Found The requested URL /en/atomic/download/ was not found on this server. Apache Server at getfedora.org Port 443 Am 13.05.19 um 21:09 schrieb nore...@fedoraproject.org: > Corres

Flock 2019 - 8-11 August - Budapest, Hungary

2019-05-15 Thread Brian (bex) Exelbierd
= Flock 2019 - 8-11 August - Budapest, Hungary The annual Fedora contributors conference, Flock, will be in Budapest, Hungary from 8-11 August. Event details, including hotel and visa letters, are all on the website[1]. == Program/CfP The call for submissions for talks and workshops is now open

Re: I plan to remove python2-pep8

2019-05-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 03. 05. 19 20:25, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 22. 04. 19 17:53, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hey. pep8 is no longer released upstream and its successor is called pycodestyle. I plan to retire python-pep8, as tracked in [1], however there are still too many consumers of python3-pep8. On the other hand, p

Re: epel 8 anytime soon?

2019-05-15 Thread Remi Collet
Le 15/05/2019 à 09:53, Remi Collet a écrit : > Le 14/05/2019 à 13:10, che...@nosuchhost.net a écrit : > >> ps.: i'm looking for php-pecl-msgpack for php71 And if you want to try EL-8, my repository already have a full PHP stack, including PHP 5.6 to 7.3 with most of possible extensions and librar

Re: epel 8 anytime soon?

2019-05-15 Thread Remi Collet
Le 14/05/2019 à 13:10, che...@nosuchhost.net a écrit : > ps.: i'm looking for php-pecl-msgpack for php71 EL-7 already have PHP 7.1 (as SCL) Should read: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/10/25/php-configuration-tips/ As additional packages for SCL were never allowed in Fedora/EPEL, such p