On 5/31/19 8:30 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
I wanted to say that while I was not able to set the password, some
update on Fedora (can't see another reason) has fixed the problem with
liveuser in the sense that it can log in without asking for a password.
Does that mean everything's good
On 5/31/19 7:31 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
I am sorry to say that this does not do anything in the sense that I
still can not get into the liveCD/ I tried setting a password 'fedora"
even in order to make sure that something was included, but I can not
access the livecd installation (sl
I wanted to say that while I was not able to set the password, some update on
Fedora (can't see another reason) has fixed the problem with liveuser in the
sense that it can log in without asking for a password.
Interesting!
On Friday, May 31, 2019, 9:32:49 PM CDT, Globe Trotter via devel
I am sorry to say that this does not do anything in the sense that I still can
not get into the liveCD/ I tried setting a password 'fedora" even in order to
make sure that something was included, but I can not access the livecd
installation (slim screen).
Are there more lines that should be add
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed, 3 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm
On 5/30/19 1:18 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I'm actually okay with the thought of Koji hub moving to Fedora. I'd
> rather see most of our infra running on Fedora so that we don't get
> kneecapped by RHEL moving too slowly. Our transition to Python 3 was
> made way more complicated by the fact our infr
On 5/19/19 6:51 PM, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Please feel free to set default dstat BZ assignment to me in this case, Kevin.
ok, done. You have dstat now.
kevin
--
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:21 PM Lukas Nykryn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> sorry for late answer I was on PTO,
>>
>> David no longer works in
On 5/14/19 12:19 AM, Lukas Nykryn wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry for late answer I was on PTO,
>
> David no longer works in Red HAt and he is not interested in maintaining
> those packages anymore.
> Could you please set the main admin of initscripts to me? And I don't think
> we are interested in the rest
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190529.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190531.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:11
Dropped images: 11
Added packages: 51
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 62.75 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 5/31/19 12:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:40 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/31/19 6:57 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
I guess we can't just switch what the signature refers to as there are other
tools
that do this kind of verification on the compressed data, not just delta-RP
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:40 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 5/31/19 6:57 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > I guess we can't just switch what the signature refers to as there are
> > other tools
> > that do this kind of verification on the compressed data, not just
> > delta-RPM, right ?
> >
> > So may
On Thursday, May 30, 2019, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/30/19 1:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dne 30. 05. 19 v 0:05 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>>>
I'm pretty sure this would break DeltaRPMs, since none of the drpm
software ha
On 5/31/19 11:16 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Przemek's emails go to spam, on gmail. I thought after the recent
> thread about dmarc stuff that this wouldn't happen anymore, at least
> on devel@
The DMARC mitigation is enabled for devel list. I am not sure why it's
not matching his emails. Can you o
On 5/31/19 6:57 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
I guess we can't just switch what the signature refers to as there are other
tools
that do this kind of verification on the compressed data, not just delta-RPM,
right ?
So maybe, could we attach a second signature computed on the uncompressed
payload ?
Przemek's emails go to spam, on gmail. I thought after the recent
thread about dmarc stuff that this wouldn't happen anymore, at least
on devel@ but I continue to see half dozen Fedora users' emails go to
spam on mostly test@ but also sometimes devel@ too.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.goog
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 7:58 AM Martin Kolman wrote:
> I guess we can't just switch what the signature refers to as there are other
> tools
> that do this kind of verification on the compressed data, not just delta-RPM,
> right ?
>
> So maybe, could we attach a second signature computed on the u
In a few days, I intend to update coq to version 8.9.1 in Rawhide, and
also update all of the packages that depend on it. The why package
has been abandoned by upstream. Its latest version does not work with
the latest versions of its dependent packages (why3 and frama-c), and
upstream has no int
I forgot to send out the agenda today, so this summary includes both tickets
approved in the meeting and outside.
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
#2134 F31 System-Wide Change: Perl 5.30
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2134
APPROVED (+7, 0, 0)
#2131 F31 System-Wide Change: MinGW environment a
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 13:20 +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> --
> > File gating.yml:
> > --- !Policy
> > product_versions:
> > - fedora-*
> > decision_context: bodhi_update_push_testing # was osci_compose_gate
> > rules:
> > - !PassingTestCaseRule {test_case_name: osci.bre
On Fri, 31 May 2019, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 5/30/19 2:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
On 5/30/19 2:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
of these are incompletely retired or there's oth
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:45 PM Jan Tulak wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:27 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> >> > Hi guys
> >> >
> >> > I'm trying to enable g
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:27 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
>> > Hi guys
>> >
>> > I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager.
>> > The tarball contai
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:19 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
> of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
> successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
> of these are incompletely r
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:57 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 13:30:10 +0200
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Dne 30. 05. 19 v 11:16 Paul Howarth napsal(a):
> > > Any pointers anyone?
> >
> > http://frostyx.cz/posts/how-to-build-modules-in-copr
>
> Thanks, but copr is on Fedora infrast
On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:44:20 +0200
Jun Aruga wrote:
> Maybe this is the document.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/
>
> In my understanding below command executes "mbs-manager" internally.
> I do not run "mbs-manager" command directly.
>
> ```
> $ fedpkg module-b
- Original Message -
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:52:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Switch RPMs to zstd
> compression
>
> On 5/30/19 2:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:31
On Thu, 30 May 2019 13:30:10 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 30. 05. 19 v 11:16 Paul Howarth napsal(a):
> > Any pointers anyone?
>
> http://frostyx.cz/posts/how-to-build-modules-in-copr
Thanks, but copr is on Fedora infrastructure and I want to use my own.
Surely it can't be that hard to u
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager.
> > The tarball contains upstream tests and I would like to use these
> > (with the ability t
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 6:46:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Copr builders moved to Fedora 30, added AARCH64 support
>
> On 5/30/19 5:00 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hello, fyi,
> ...snip...
>
> > As a bonus, we
* Jonathan Dieter:
> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 20:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> 'dnf info deltarpm' says
>> URL : http://gitorious.org/deltarpm/deltarpm
>> which has an expired certificate, but pushing passed that it says
>> current version 3.6 is 5 years old. Is this really maintained or
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager.
> The tarball contains upstream tests and I would like to use these
> (with the ability to apply patches to them, same as to the rest of the
> code). I hav
Hi guys
I'm trying to enable gating tests for package system-storage-manager.
The tarball contains upstream tests and I would like to use these
(with the ability to apply patches to them, same as to the rest of the
code). I have a gating.yaml and tests.yml that works in RHEL exactly
as I want it,
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 16:18 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> That said, I'm less happy about the thought that inspecting Fedora
> RPMs on RHEL 8 or openSUSE is going to be a royal pain.
> Ecosystem-wise, no one really prepared for a distribution to switch
> to
> zstd so quickly. Thankfully, it's easie
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:44:23AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/30/19 7:54 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >>I think before approving such changes, owners need to do mass
> >>rebuilds on their own and provide a graph of changes in size
> >>between original compression format and new one(s).
> >Doing t
I've orphaned crypto-utils. If there is any interest in keeping
/usr/bin/certwatch I created a new upstream for that so could revive
it as a new package without all the other stuff which accumulated in
crypto-utils, let me know.
Regards, Joe
___
devel m
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:36 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 mai 2019 à 02:15 +0200, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> > On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Dne 29. 05. 19 v 23:52 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > > If we d
Le jeudi 30 mai 2019 à 14:29 -0700, Samuel Sieb a écrit :
> On 5/30/19 1:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Daniel Mach
> > wrote:
> > > Dne 30. 05. 19 v 0:05 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > > > I'm pretty sure this would break DeltaRPMs, since none of the
> > > > drpm
> > >
Le vendredi 31 mai 2019 à 02:15 +0200, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 29. 05. 19 v 23:52 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > If we did this, wouldn't it make it very difficult to use tools
> > > like
> > > mock on RHEL / CentOS 7 to build
39 matches
Mail list logo
