On 6/2/19 8:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Perhaps related, on an upgraded Fedora 30 system I see
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-37.fc27.noarch, which does not appear on any
clean installed systems, and also can't be installed (Error: Unable to
find a match ). That tells me it's been dropped or is obsolete,
Perhaps related, on an upgraded Fedora 30 system I see
ghostscript-fonts-5.50-37.fc27.noarch, which does not appear on any
clean installed systems, and also can't be installed (Error: Unable to
find a match ). That tells me it's been dropped or is obsolete, so is
it normal for such packages to
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/06/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.3-20190602git423a7ba.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
292 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
100 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2
tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7
67
Hi,
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-60ba61b5ab
Why does this happen every time?
Would someone please kick it? Thanks
--
Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Notification time stamped 2019-06-02 21:03:53 UTC
From 02fdbe1f7cb9d06f66cac9c7b00cb9658cd27e56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 02 2019 21:03:46 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
Notification time stamped 2019-06-02 21:00:44 UTC
From bdc1476a739a9100147f7c8ca723289281cc7422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 02 2019 21:00:37 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Type-Tie.spec b/perl-Type-Tie.spec
Notification time stamped 2019-06-02 20:55:24 UTC
From 30ca23c500fbbdd25cdbb0f1bd2199062143a023 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 02 2019 20:55:17 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec
Notification time stamped 2019-06-02 20:54:53 UTC
From 42dd8a10cbc6c9d06fe4b60e6173b30668a00916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 02 2019 20:54:48 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec
index
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019, 21:14 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 05. 19 16:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:19 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>
> >> Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
> >> of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't
On 31. 05. 19 16:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:19 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716084
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
anything urgent for the agenda. If you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks, everyone!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
On Sunday, 2 June 2019 00.37.19 WEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> He wants to *read* the man page, not merely know that it exists. No
> idea why it might be a ghost file?
Oh, fair enough, it is my fault then. :-)
> But in the meantime, install it in
> a "mock" setup or a VM to read it or install
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, Leigh Scott wrote:
Your fix for libtommath was incomplete.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1277908
It was also having issues with parallel build for docs.
Sorry, a local mock build and the simple-koji-ci build passed, so I didn't
know. It looks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716171
Bug ID: 1716171
Summary: perl-Devel-PatchPerl-1.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Devel-PatchPerl
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716159
Bug ID: 1716159
Summary: perl-TeX-Encode-2.006 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-TeX-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716159
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1576294
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1576294=edit
[patch] Update to 2.006 (#1716159)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
> On Jun 2, 2019, at 04:50, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
> Please file a bug against the package arguing that the %ghost directive
> seems to be abused in this case (it really should be used for log (and maybe
> configuration files) not shipped with the package but linked to it.
Use of %ghost is
Your fix for libtommath was incomplete.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1277908
It was also having issues with parallel build for docs.
I haven't got time to do the other packages.
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714152
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714796
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
* Georg Sauthoff [01/06/2019 19:40] :
>
> But what about the `dnf provides` output?
>
> It looks like something is going wrong in the process that generates the
> file-index. Should I open a bug for this, as well? And where?
Wow, that git history is messy...
Please file a bug against the
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:58:08AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 29/04/19 18:16 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:11:53PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
> > > John Reiser writes:
> > [..]
> > > > What is the nature of the incompatibilities, and what are specific
> > > >
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 08:04:25AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:47 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > This is caused by use of the %ghost directive in the %files
> > section of the .spec file:
> >
> > %files -n dpm-copy-server-mysql
> > %{_libdir}/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:14:40PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/1/19 12:29 PM, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio
> > > >
On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 21:47 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 09:29:33PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > > $ rpm -qlp dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm
> > > /etc/dpm-mysql/dpmcopyd.logrotate
> > > /etc/logrotate.d/dpmcopyd
> > > /usr/lib/.build-id
> > >
On 6/1/19 12:29 PM, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
$ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm |
cpio -di -D o -v
Why are you going through cpio, instead of just
28 matches
Mail list logo
