Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Mono 5.20

2019-07-14 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
Hello, Ben Cotton. Fri, 12 Jul 2019 09:38:28 -0400 you wrote: > Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 5.18 to 5.20. Also please update NuGet package. It was not updated for ages and cannot install modern dotnet dependencies. Packaged version: 2.8.7. Current stable version: 5.0.2. RHBZ: https://

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Florian Weimer
* Miro Hrončok: > The only other use/need for the repostories is to allow maintainers to > debug and test fixes for multilib shipped packages, but the koji > buildroot repo can be used for this use case. > ** modify mock to use the koji buildroot for i686 for f31+ for those > few users that need

Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases

2019-07-14 Thread Benjamin Doron
Hi all, Change author here. I think that everything is on-track now. Sorry I hadn't seen any of these messages before, there's a newer post over here (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/L64OGN7XWO7VQEUDKFB3IJ2HYUFTSPFA/) and I hadn't realised that

Re: python-oauthlib update

2019-07-14 Thread Chris
Hi! I just wanted to chime in as the maintainer and developer of Apprise. I'm only using the OAuth v1 client and only for Twitter notifications, so i don't foresee any issues. Either way, I'll test it out as per your advice. If it's incompatible, I'll do my part and fix it up on my side. Thank

Re: roundup of failing images for 2019-07-07

2019-07-14 Thread Rich Mattes
On 7/7/19 7:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 6. Fedora robotics live: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36106496 I've submitted a PR and triggered a rebuild of an offending package to get this at least working again. I'm hoping to dedicate some more time this cycle to do some mor

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/14/19 2:35 PM, John Reiser wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Neal Gompa wrote: > > [[snip]] > >>> This will also make it impossible for people to locally do multilib >>> build/installs. It will remove COPR’s ability to do the same. For that >>> reason alone, I don’t particularly want this chang

Re: Orphaned python-breathe

2019-07-14 Thread Dan Čermák
I'll take it: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8531 Miro Hrončok writes: > Upon the maintainers request, I've just orphaned python-breathe. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706355 > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > ___

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/14/19 2:27 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Building library packages and making your own multilib repo is > impossible without having both the i686 repo and the x86_64 repo, as > you need to build for both and then munge them together for a multilib > repo. Sure. Do many people do that anymore? > Hi

Re: manpath.be, man page package checks/policy

2019-07-14 Thread Georg Sauthoff
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 04:49:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 04:19:02PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: [..] > > See also its about page https://manpath.be/about for some of its > > features (e.g. permalinks, short links, reverse links ...). > > Looks interes

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread John Reiser
Kevin Fenzi wrote: Neal Gompa wrote: [[snip]] This will also make it impossible for people to locally do multilib build/installs. It will remove COPR’s ability to do the same. For that reason alone, I don’t particularly want this change to happen. Can you expand on what you mean by 'locall

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:21 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 7/14/19 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > This will also make it impossible for people to locally do multilib > > build/installs. It will remove COPR’s ability to do the same. For that > > reason alone, I don’t particularly want this change

Re: Difference between pungi and livemedia-creator

2019-07-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/14/19 1:19 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > I was using livemedia-creator but I'd want to understand well what's the > differences between both pungi and livemedia-creator. pungi is a higher level tool for making everything. So, pungi talks to koji, gathers rpms, calls createrepo_c to make r

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 7/14/19 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > This will also make it impossible for people to locally do multilib > build/installs. It will remove COPR’s ability to do the same. For that > reason alone, I don’t particularly want this change to happen. Can you expand on what you mean by 'locally do' ?

Difference between pungi and livemedia-creator

2019-07-14 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I was using livemedia-creator but I'd want to understand well what's the differences between both pungi and livemedia-creator. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 4:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noi686Repositories > > (Ben is on vacation, so I announcing this on his behalf.) > > == Summary == > > Stop producing and distributing the Modular and Everything i686 repositories. > > == Owner == > > *

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

2019-07-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noi686Repositories (Ben is on vacation, so I announcing this on his behalf.) == Summary == Stop producing and distributing the Modular and Everything i686 repositories. == Owner == * Name: Kevin Fenzi * Email: ke...@scrye.com == Current status == * Targ

Re: Long standing FTBFS

2019-07-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 23. 06. 19 22:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages fail to build from source from at least Fedora 28 and their FTBFs bugs are still in the NEW state. Please make them build or retire them from Fedora. If you cannot work on the packages but still consider them useful, orphan them:

Re: manpath.be, man page package checks/policy

2019-07-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 04:19:02PM +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > Hello, > > so I've created https://manpath.be - a site that provides access to the > man pages of several distributions - including several Fedora and CentOS > versions. > > See also its about page https://manpath.be/about for some

Re: Fedora Data Engineering SIG: interested in a Fedora SIG to work on this?

2019-07-14 Thread Mohd Izhar Firdaus Ismail
Hmm .. I think I'll do something in between, .. a set of documentation on how to install and run the softwares , and a set of rpms which contains Fedora integration (systemd service, profile.d files, wrapper scripts, etc) to make things works better with Fedora if the user followed the convention