Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA and blocker review meetings
tomorrow. It's been a messy week here and I forgot to send
announcements until now, so the notice would be very short, and I don't
think there are any very urgent issues at present.
If you're aware of anything important we have t
Hi all,
I'm Aymen, and I'm a comp-sci student in the UK. I'm looking to become a
package maintainer--I've been involved in open source projects in the
past, however this is my first time dealing with package maintenance.
I've submitted my first package at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:31 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 08:33:02AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:46 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Good Morning,
> > >
> > > We posted this [1] blog today and want to open a mailing thread to garner
>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
27 of 47 required tests failed, 19 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.u
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190720.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190721.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 167.09 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
this is probably question for mutter/gnome-shell maintainers. But as I see
it, there is a reason why are those patches not backported into stable
branches in upstream. There can be regressions, the thing that you have
zero issues doesn't mean anybody else won't have them. Backporting those
pat
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:52 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:13:21AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:04 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 10. 07. 19 v 9:19 James Antill napsal(a):
> > > > 2. adduser/group/etc. => sysusers files
On rawhide, I see:
wcslib-5.19.1-2.fc30.x86_64 is required by:
- astrometry-0.78-1.fc31.x86_64
- libwcs.so.5()(64bit)
- astrometry-libs-0.78-1.fc31.x86_64
- libwcs.so.5()(64bit)
- cpl-7.1.1-1.fc31.x86_64
- libwcs.so.5()(64bit)
- kstars-1:3.2.1-1.fc31.x86_64
- libwcs.so.5()(
Does it change SONAME?
Easiest way would be to install `fedora-repos-rawhide` and run
something like: `dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libwcs.so.5()(64bit)'
--source --exactdeps`
I see it also has python bindings, does it break API too?
___
devel mailing
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 12:38 PM Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm going to update wcslib from 5.19 to 6.3. It breaks API, so I'm
> announcing it here in advance.
>
> The policy [1] says that I should notify also the maintainers of the packages
> that depend on mine. What command I have to ru
Hello. Before sending PR on src.fedora i want to discuss first this
there. Here is few COPR repos with performance patches for 'mutter' and
'gnome-shell':
1. Repo with all performance patches (merged, closed, open) and with
huge regression on NVIDIA cards:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/copr
Hello, I'm going to update wcslib from 5.19 to 6.3. It breaks API, so I'm
announcing it here in advance.
The policy [1] says that I should notify also the maintainers of the
packages that depend on mine. What command I have to run to know the names
of the packages?
After a bit to research I did:
Hi all.
MUMPS-5.2.1 is coming on Rawhide.
Involved packages have been rebuilt on Copr for testing:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https
Hello, Barry Scott.
Sun, 21 Jul 2019 09:54:32 +0100 you wrote:
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find
> release associated with build: python-pycxx-7.1.3-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
Rawhide packages will be automatically pushed to repositories. You don't
need to us
For python-pycxx I have been working on an update.
The builds for f29, f30 and f31 all all good done on 2019-07-08.
I can use fedpkg update for f29 and f30.
But get this for master (aka f31?) when I ran it today.
$ fedpkg switch-branch master
$ fedpkg update
Could not execute update: Could not ge
15 matches
Mail list logo
