[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL-8 package requests are now open

Thank you all for releasing EPEL 8  -- Lee On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:12 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 8/8/19 8:38 AM, Robert Scheck wrote: > > Hello Stephen, > > > > On Thu, 01 Aug 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> I would like to thank everyone for their patience and for the people who

gettext retired, rawhide broken

Can somebody please unretire and fix gettext? It was just automatically retired because it didn't build successfully since fedora 29. And now the world is broken. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[Bug 1739331] New: rebuilding src.rpm failed due to missing website

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739331 Bug ID: 1739331 Summary: rebuilding src.rpm failed due to missing website Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTML-WikiConverter Assignee:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-08-09 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190808git3575730.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:23 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:17 Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > > > wrote: >> > On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: >> > Eclipse will be shipping in modules only from F31. >

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

On 08. 08. 19 19:23, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On Aug 8, 2019 10:57 AM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675390 Fedora Release Engineering changed:    What    |Removed |Added

Xorg 1.20.4-7.el7

Just tried building a scratch build of xorgxrdp, but this still pulls in the old Xorg, before RHEL 7.7 version. Could someone please change that, so that builds pick the latest package up. All in relation to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738669

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL-8 package requests are now open

On 8/8/19 8:38 AM, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > On Thu, 01 Aug 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I would like to thank everyone for their patience and for the people who >> have put in a lot of work to get us to where we can start building >> packages. > > even it's late, I still

[EPEL-devel] Re: partclone-0.3.12-1.el7 fails to clone and restore FAT12 partition

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Robert Nichols wrote: > > The new version of partclone (0.3.12-1.el7) will not properly save and > restore FAT12. If I save a FAT12 EFI partition with "partclone.fat12 -c -o > test.pcl -i /dev/sdg2" and then restore it to a different device with >

[EPEL-devel] Re: partclone-0.3.12-1.el7 fails to clone and restore FAT12 partition

On 8/8/19 3:40 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: Where can I find the 0.3.11 RPM? I don't have it saved anywhere, and I need to downgrade one system. OK. I found the archive directory. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.

[EPEL-devel] partclone-0.3.12-1.el7 fails to clone and restore FAT12 partition

The new version of partclone (0.3.12-1.el7) will not properly save and restore FAT12. If I save a FAT12 EFI partition with "partclone.fat12 -c -o test.pcl -i /dev/sdg2" and then restore it to a different device with "partclone.restore -i testpcl -o sdh2", then the restored filesystem has I/O

Re: Disappearing mouse pointer

confirmed that running on 5.1.20-300 this issue is not present Antonio Montagnani Linux Fedora 30 Workstation da/from Gmail Il giorno gio 8 ago 2019 alle ore 21:43 Owen Taylor ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:34 PM Antonio M > wrote: > >> I am the reporter of bug >>

Re: Disappearing mouse pointer

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:34 PM Antonio M wrote: > I am the reporter of bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738614 > I have never such an issue before kernels 5..2.x and it is not always true > that clicking on notation bar solves the issue > Do you think you could try downgrading

Re: Sundials2 on EPEL7

Thank you Robert. On 08/08/19 20:45, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Thursday, 8 August 2019 19:11:32 CEST Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2 >> cannot be created? >> >>

Re: Sundials2 on EPEL7

On Thursday, 8 August 2019 19:11:32 CEST Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2 > cannot be created? > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2/branches?branchname=master >

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to use epel8-playground?

Stephen, The package is singularity. The term "branch" in this context is not very clear to me. All I know is that there's no git branch on pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/singularity; I don't know about other systems. Dave On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:21:32PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >

Re: Disappearing mouse pointer

I am the reporter of bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738614 I have never such an issue before kernels 5..2.x and it is not always true that clicking on notation bar solves the issue Antonio Montagnani Linux Fedora 30 Workstation da/from Gmail Il giorno gio 8 ago 2019 alle

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

On Aug 8, 2019 10:57 AM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675390 Fedora Release Engineering changed:    What    |Removed |Added

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

> * Stephen Gallagher: > > > Can we make this happen at the RPM level? So that third-party RPMs > install just fine even though the operating system is something else > (not x86_64 anymore)? I do not see many explicit dependencies on > anything “x86_64” in Fedora 30, so perhaps this is doable,

Sundials2 on EPEL7

Hi all. Please, can anyone explain to me why an EPEL7 branch for sundials2 cannot be created? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sundials2/branches?branchname=master https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/14973 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject

Re: Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

ons 2019-08-07 klockan 08:30 +0200 skrev Lubomír Sedlář: > On my machine git creates the file on any clone. How did you manage to > configure it to not do so? > That being said, it's still a bug and should be fixed. You can prevent fedpkg from adding patterns to the exclude file by adding the

Re: Disappearing mouse pointer

Recently filed bugs about similar issues: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738614 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739169 Not sure if they are the *same* problem or different problems. They look like the same issue (cursor only visible over application windows) - but one

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5) > Plack as it is packaged in Fedora requires (at least for building) mod_perl. Yes, there's a Plack::Handler::Apache2 to run PSGI apps using mod_perl2 and it

Re: seabios / seabios-bin split in Fedora - why?

Thanks everyone. I've made some changes which were suggested and have filed a package review. Let's continue discussion on the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739133 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE EPEL-8 package requests are now open

Hello Stephen, On Thu, 01 Aug 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I would like to thank everyone for their patience and for the people who > have put in a lot of work to get us to where we can start building > packages. even it's late, I still want to thank you for your hard work on EPEL 8 and

[389-devel] please review: PR #50523: Ticket 50490 objects and memory leaks

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50523 -- Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander

Re: seabios / seabios-bin split in Fedora - why?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 08/08/19 16:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm trying to package OpenSBI RISC-V firmware for Fedora > > (https://github.com/riscv/opensbi). It's a similar situation to > > SeaBIOS and other architecture firmware. We have to

Re: seabios / seabios-bin split in Fedora - why?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm trying to package OpenSBI RISC-V firmware for Fedora > (https://github.com/riscv/opensbi). It's a similar situation to > SeaBIOS and other architecture firmware. We have to cross-compile a > binary on potentially any Koji

Re: HEADS UP: Source File Verification

Joe Orton wrote: > If you don't enforce GPG verification at or before "fedpkg upload" there > is no assurance that what hits the lookaside cache is trusted, so I > agree - doing this at build time is a good example of not caring about > security until it's too late. I hope most people reading

Re: seabios / seabios-bin split in Fedora - why?

On 08/08/19 16:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'm trying to package OpenSBI RISC-V firmware for Fedora > (https://github.com/riscv/opensbi). It's a similar situation to > SeaBIOS and other architecture firmware. We have to cross-compile a > binary on potentially any Koji architecture, and end

seabios / seabios-bin split in Fedora - why?

I'm trying to package OpenSBI RISC-V firmware for Fedora (https://github.com/riscv/opensbi). It's a similar situation to SeaBIOS and other architecture firmware. We have to cross-compile a binary on potentially any Koji architecture, and end up with a noarch package, because the final firmware

Re: Disappearing mouse pointer

I'm seeing this with Intel graphics, but not involving virt-manager. My pointer disappears when I open the GNOME 3 notifications dialog, and reappears when I move off it or close it. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in

[Bug 1627117] perl-Gtk3-0.034-3.fc30 FTBFS: Undefined subroutine ::Gdk::PIXDATA_HEADER_LENGTH called at /builddir/build/BUILD/Gtk3-0.034/blib/lib/Gtk3.pm line 2119

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627117 Mohan Boddu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

On 07. 08. 19 19:45, Neal Becker wrote: Petr Stodulka wrote: On 07. 08. 19 19:31, Petr Stodulka wrote: On 07. 08. 19 3:34, Mads Kiilerich wrote: On 8/6/19 9:35 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote: So it's question, should I rebase it in rawhide and setup for Python3 already even when it is so

Retiring FTBFS packages from Fedora 30

Hello all, As per the FTBFS policy [1], we started the retirement of the packages that have been FTBFS since F30 mass rebuild. Please follow the unretirement process [2] if you are planning to re-add the package to Fedora. [1]

Retiring FTBFS packages from Fedora 30

Hello all, As per the FTBFS policy [1], we started the retirement of the packages that have been FTBFS since F30 mass rebuild. Please follow the unretirement process [2] if you are planning to re-add the package to Fedora. [1]

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

On 8/7/19 11:24 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> If you want small images, just use buildah. > Dockerfile-based multi-stage builds are significantly more popular than this > and should really be mentioned first. Buildah supports multi-stage

Fedora-Rawhide-20190808.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 12 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190808.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190807.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190808.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 160 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 37.25 MiB Size of dropped packages

A Friday with Infra

Good Morning Everyone, As you may remember from [1] the CPE team has started categorizing its applications into the following categories: 1. We maintain it, we run it 2. We don’t maintain it, we run it 3. We don’t maintain it, we don’t run it 4. We turn it off In this process we picked the

A Friday with Infra

Good Morning Everyone, As you may remember from [1] the CPE team has started categorizing its applications into the following categories: 1. We maintain it, we run it 2. We don’t maintain it, we run it 3. We don’t maintain it, we don’t run it 4. We turn it off In this process we picked the

Re: HEADS UP: Source File Verification

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:22:56PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > "JO" == Joe Orton writes: > > > > JO> In the historic CVS-based build system which predated what we now > > JO> use, we could do GPG key verification at the time of downloading and > > JO>

[Bug 1738385] Request mod_perl package for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- Plack as it is packaged in Fedora requires (at least for building) mod_perl. I have locally tried to drop the dependency and I was successful. I was even successful with packaging the Plack stack into

[Bug 1738791] New: Upgrade perl-TheSchwartz to 1.13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738791 Bug ID: 1738791 Summary: Upgrade perl-TheSchwartz to 1.13 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-TheSchwartz Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr

Re: Capitalized name in bugzilla review request and pagure repo

On 07. 08. 19 23:44, Jordan Ogas via devel wrote: In case someone bumps into this in the future, the solution was quite simple: edit the bugzilla ticket, fix the capitalization (or whatever typo) and then request a new repo via fedpkg. Please also retire the wrongly created package: $ cd

[Bug 1737394] Upgrade perl-Dancer2 to 0.208001

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737394 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

OpenCL on Intel processors

Hi, Beignet has been deprecated, might it be possible to put Intel(R) Graphics Compute Runtime for OpenCL(TM) in the Fedora repositories? There is a COPR repository at: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jdanecki/intel-opencl/ Is there a means by which generation of CPU and GPU being

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing xrootd-4.10.0-1.el6 Details about builds: xrootd-4.10.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-305467555d) Extended ROOT file server