Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
thing is "how to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a
RHEL-8 host"?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Hello,
I've orphaned all my Java packages and my plan is to retire them next week,
if no one wants them. There is many of them, but all (except last 2 in the
list) were added to the distribution as dependencies of Jenkins package.
Thanks,
Michal
rpms/jenkins
rpms/jenkins-antisamy-markup-formatte
/me sending the email second time as the first attempt bounced back to me
Hi Greg,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The package is, unfortunately,
broken in all supported Fedora releases. The version of the package is the
last stable release from 1.x branch, but upstream is now (and has
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 3:50:19 AM MST Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Responding to the first message because I'm not interested in further
> discussion. It's clear to me that there will be no agreement in this
> matter unless there are reasonable potential alternatives. Therefore,
> this message is just
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 1:11:02 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Debian has a permissive firewall
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
>
>
> And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
> permissive,
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:34:09 AM MST Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
>
>
> > Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want
> > to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't
> > really accomplish anything: eith
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:29:32 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> Workstation is the primary product. Some choose that not for GNOME...
> but because they want to start with the most base product and
> customize from there. If you start with a Spin, you may get something
> pre-configured in a very w
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:17:11 AM MST Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thin
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Book wrote:
> I would agree, but people do install multiple desktops after installing a
> spin. Such a use case needs to be considered (not sure if it matters,
> though).
This is definitely not the ideal scenario, especially not from the case of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746534
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from Fedo
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:11:43 AM MST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
> > anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
>
> >
> >
>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:18 PM Japheth Cleaver wrote:
>
> On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
> >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin of
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the svnmailer package has recently been orphaned and will be retired if
> nobody picks it up.
>
> The package provides a tool to email emailed notifications of events in
> subversion repositories. It is written in Python (2) a
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 7:57 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> It is intended for both py2 and py3 packages to be parallel installed,
> correct?
They are supposed to be entirely distinct binary rpms, even if built from the
same stone. *By convention*, the non-numbered binary is the linked to the
sy
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Debian has a permissive firewall
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
>
> And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
> permissive, they all accept ev
On 29. 08. 19 23:54, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Also this bugzilla was open to let users remove them and not get them
again when the package that recommends them updates, but the dnf team
disagrees:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699672
Maybe it would be time for FE
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:54:57 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
> PS I won't take this thread any further. The irony of a back and forth in
> the back and forth thread doesn't escape me!
I couldn't disagree with that any more!!!
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
_
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Also this bugzilla was open to let users remove them and not get them
> again when the package that recommends them updates, but the dnf team
> disagrees:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699672
Maybe it would be time for FESCo to require them to implement us
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If I say:
>
> 2019-08-20 at 00:00UTC I think I can guess this to be the very start of
> that day, perhaps?
>
> 2019-08-29 at 24:00UTC is... what? the last miliseconds of that day and
> thus really right next to 2019-08-30 00:00UTC?
2019-08-29 24:00UTC = 2019-08-30 00:00UTC
Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
flags in aarch64.
Something is amiss there. A small snippet from openmpi:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/openmpi-4.0.2rc1/ompi/mpi/cxx'
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -DNDEBUG
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>>>
>>> Dne 31. 05. 19 v 2:15 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
>>>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Mi
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than
> > three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR
> > rebasing it to
Thanks Jerry -- what you describe is exactly what I am seeing in the build.log
Phil
On Thursday, August 29, 2019, 04:20:22 PM EDT, Jerry James
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:05 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
> Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds a
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:05 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
> Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds are
> failing on that arch.
There sure is. I had the same thing happen with a qd build. Look for
this in your build log:
checking for g++ option to produce PIC.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:24 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Debian has a permissive firewall
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianFirewall
And Ubuntu, Mint, elementary, MX Linux, Solus, pop!_OS, as well. By
permissive, they all accept everything. Nothing is rejected or
dropped.
Mageia, and openSUSE do h
Is there something odd going on with arch aarch64 -- openmpi builds are
failing on that arch.
On Thursday, August 29, 2019, 04:37:55 AM EDT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Packages are now built. Update is submitted for F31
[https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-af50f
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:44 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/29/19 11:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
> >>
> > You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the be
Hello testers!
After Flock 2019 this year, it became apparent that there are several folks
who would like to join the testing effort, but do not want to use IRC and
would prefer to communicate over Telegram. Consequently, we have started a
Telegram group that testers can join to communicate with o
On 8/29/19 11:05 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
>>
> You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the best kind
> of correct. I've seen it to mean "midnight at the end of
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
> squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
> The bug which has the comment is:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747102
>
> These are based on some man pa
I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
The bug which has the comment is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747102
These are based on some man pages used in Debian at one time, but do not
track changes in the or
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/26/19 3:43 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event
> >> where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open so
On 8/27/19 8:36 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Regarding NNTP I've haven't used newsreaders in years and to be honest dealing
with yet another tool isn't something I would want to do
I forgot what email client you use, but all clients I ever used (Emacs
and Thunderbird) also do NNTP. After all, it'
On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin of
Fedora which is affected by this decision.
The default firewall conf
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
> anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603
It's not only out of date, but also
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> 24:00 does not exist? Or to me it makes as little sense as 00:00.
>
You're technically correct, which Futurama taught me is the best kind
of correct. I've seen it to mean "midnight at the end of the day" in
order to distinguish from "midnight
The jenkins pacakge is fearfully out of date and seems unmaintained. Does
anyone know how to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of the package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560603
--Greg
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
On 8/27/19 5:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I think that all the major milestones happen typically on Tuesday, so
>> this must have been (unfortunate) typo IMO.
>
> But the point is that this was corrected less than 24 hours before the
> freeze kicks in. This is a completely u
On 8/26/19 3:43 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:46 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> We're just over a month away from Hacktoberfest[1], a month-long event
>> where people can earn a t-shirt by contributing to open source
>> projects (or at least ones hosted on GitHub). It occurs
On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
>
> > Dne 31. 05. 19 v 2:15 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> >
> >> On Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:38:25 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dne 29. 05. 19 v 23:52 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> >>>
>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 18:06, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> Thanks all for the replies... I was under the impression from the previous
> response I needed to submit to bodhi, but I believe I misinterpreted and that
> was intended for future changes going forward. Looking at bodhi now it's a
> littl
Thanks all for the replies... I was under the impression from the previous
response I needed to submit to bodhi, but I believe I misinterpreted and
that was intended for future changes going forward. Looking at bodhi now
it's a little confusing seeing f29, f30 and f32 there but no f31.
On Thu, Au
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:36, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> If I do that, I believe I get into a situation where the other builds f29,
> f30 and F32 are behind, which if I remember correctly causes other issues -
> and shouldn't we understand what is wrong with the system rather than just
> trying t
mcatanz...@gnome.org writes:
> Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want
> to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't
> really accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network
> access and you have whitelisted it (in which ca
If I do that, I believe I get into a situation where the other builds f29,
f30 and F32 are behind, which if I remember correctly causes other issues -
and shouldn't we understand what is wrong with the system rather than just
trying to hack around it?
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:17 PM Adam Williams
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:47:49 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> I'm still getting these messages when I try to do "fedpkg update" for
> F31:
>
> fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot
> find release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 07:56 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Guys, I'm still getting this message:
> fedpkg update
> Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find
> release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
> A copy of the filled in template is saved a
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:11 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris
> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > > > A similar idea that would keep it separate from t
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:46:58 PM MST Christopher wrote:
> > > A similar idea that would keep it separate from the installer might be
> > > to offer a dialogue as a "first-boot" ac
Guys, I'm still getting this message:
fedpkg update
Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Cannot find
release associated with build: copyq-3.9.2-1.fc31, tags: ['f31']
A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last
I just checked bodhi and other packages are
On 29. 08. 19 15:31, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Also python36, python35, and python34.
I'm 100% confident that I never explicitly installed these.
Having python38 broke my devel setup due to there being no Cython in
/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/... I don't know how long it was broken.
Very
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:32 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Also python36, python35, and python34.
They could have been pulled in via Recommends:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrecommends python38
python3-tox-0:3.5.3-3.fc30.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --whatrecommends python36
asv-0:0.3.1-7.fc30.x86_64
asv-0:0.4.
Also python36, python35, and python34.
I'm 100% confident that I never explicitly installed these.
Having python38 broke my devel setup due to there being no Cython in
/usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/... I don't know how long it was
broken. Very annoying to discover this.
How do I prevent th
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190828.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 23
Dropped packages:24
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 209.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
9 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Wor
Responding to the first message because I'm not interested in further
discussion. It's clear to me that there will be no agreement in this
matter unless there are reasonable potential alternatives. Therefore,
this message is just to let you all know that I'm at least trying to
push for better alter
* John Harris:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:27:56 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
>> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality* over
>> quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
>> tiresome to keep up with)
>
> Such a rule would make it very
Aug 29, 2019, 00:23 by joh...@splentity.com:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 9:27:56 AM MST Chris Peters wrote:
>
>> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality* over
>> quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
>> tiresome to keep up with)
>>
Hello,
A reminder of today's meeting at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on Freenode
(details below).
Please inform me if you'd like to add new items to the agenda. I'll see
you there!
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 15:57:46 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> You are invited to attend the Open Neuro
Packages are now built. Update is submitted for F31
[https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-af50f19b83].
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:08:23AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started doing the rebuilds now. I'll submit buildroot overrides
> as I go. (I was hoping t
60 matches
Mail list logo
