The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13
clamav-0.101.4-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
freeradius-client-1.1.7-20.el8
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/31/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190830git0c94f21.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af80b147c4
python-mitogen-0.2.8-1.el6
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-54cf4d603d
seamonkey-2.49.5-1.el6
The following builds
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
381 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
156 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
122
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just got hit by this again - lockups on s390. Looks like I have
> 100% reproducer (just try to build Erlang and it will stuck
> eventually).
>
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37327589
>
>
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday, as it's a
public holiday in the US, Canada and India, so many folks would be
missing. It would be good to follow up on the btrfs and Xen
discussions, but we can do it the following week I think. Note that
there will be a blocker review
# F31 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-09-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final
blocker and 10 proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have a
Fedora 31 blocker review meeting ON
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:26 AM Martin Kolman wrote:
>
> I would personally still find even 24:00 confusing & would really suggest
> something
> clearly inambigous, such as 23:45 UTC or similar - that should clear any
> doubt of which day
> the freeze is part of once and for all & yet again no
Due to the US holiday, several of us won't be there. The next meeting
will be on Monday (2019-09-09).
Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:43 AM Timothée Floure
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a few
> weeks ago. Sorry for the delay!
>
> The Fedora community contains a lot of university students, many of us
> packaging tools for their
On 30. 08. 19 18:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
Not. If you're getting it on an installed system that you're upgrading,
you probably need to manually switch the libgit2 module from the 0.27
stream to the 0.28 stream, that should clear it up.
I'm hit by this when trying to upgrade to F31:
Problém
Hey,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 03:21:43PM +0200, Nikola Forr? wrote:
> I'm planning to update exempi to version 2.5.1 in rawhide, and it
> includes a SONAME change from "libexempi.so.3" to "libexempi.so.8".
>
> Affected packages are:
>
> caja
> eog
> eom
> equalx
> nemo
> tellico
> tracker-miners
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:17:11 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, in the squashfs-tools case these are in the looaside cache, so you
could (all be it ugly looking), use:
Hi,
This is yet another follow-up for this thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XUZLHJ5O32OX24LG44R7UZ2TMN6NY47N/
Basics:
"zswap" compresses swap and uses a defined memory pool as a cache,
with spill over (still compressed) going into a
Hi,
This is a follow-up for this thread:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XUZLHJ5O32OX24LG44R7UZ2TMN6NY47N/
Has anyone looked at oomd, or is anyone interested in testing and
comparing it to alternatives?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM, Christopher
wrote:
Yeah, I also don't want a complicated installer. I just don't see this
disagreement going anywhere without some sort of compromise, and I
can't think of any others that will satisfy people. I think there's a
good chance this could be
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:33 AM, Jiri Eischmann
wrote:
And the same document says:
"While our focus is on creating a top-class developer workstation, our
developer focus will not compromise the aforementioned goal to be a
polished and user friendly system that appeals to a wide general
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549
Bug ID: 1747549
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
OLD: Fedora-31-20190828.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190829.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:23
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages:245.40 MiB
If you're interested, feel free to add your name to the Members section
of the University SIG [2] wiki. I don't see why grad students can't
join as well :)
As of now, I don't think there is a set "agenda" for the SIG to focus
on. I believe around next week we will focus on figuring out the best
Hi Kevin,
It's started working.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Fenzi [mailto:ke...@scrye.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 8:58 PM
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: getting below error in fedpkg clone
On 8/30/19 6:54 AM, Filipe
On 8/28/19 2:13 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just got hit by this again - lockups on s390. Looks like I have
> 100% reproducer (just try to build Erlang and it will stuck
> eventually).
>
> * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37327589
>
> Where should I open
On 8/29/19 11:37 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>> I got a warning about not having urls for a couple of files in the
>> squashfs-tools package from release monitoring.
>> The bug which has the comment is:
>>
On 8/29/19 11:44 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
>> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
>
> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
> thing is "how to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20190828.n.0):
ID: 438981 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/438981
ID: 438989 Test: x86_64
Jenkins in a container is begging for container churn with artifacts and logs.
Jenkins *slaves* are another story,
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:38 PM, John Harris wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:11:43 AM MST Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied
'bitfrost' dependency — NEW
ACTION: releng to make Pungi config changes
2. desktop-backgrounds — Fedora 31 still using Fedora 30 backgrounds — NEW
ACTION:
I've got a bug report[1] for BackupPC where the user is having issues with
AVC denials when browsing hosts.
This is actually from my COPR but it's the same SRPM I use for Fedora.
There are almost 50k downloads and this is the only report of a problem so
I don't think there's a fundamental issue
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 06:42:15PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> A slightly more detailed description can be found on the related wiki page
> [2].
> I invite you to add your name to its members section you're interested to work
> with us. We will figure out communication and coordination
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:54 AM Michal Srb wrote:
> /me sending the email second time as the first attempt bounced back to me
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The package is, unfortunately,
> broken in all supported Fedora releases. The version of the package is the
>
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13
clamav-0.101.4-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
R-3.6.1-1.el8
R-rpm-macros-1.1.0-2.el8
+1 for this idea,i'd love to join this sig
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:01 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:43 PM Timothée Floure
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a
> > few
> > weeks ago. Sorry for
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:37 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 23. 08. 19 v 18:20 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > There's nothing you can do, releng needs to rebuild modules:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8664
> >
>
> Is this error:
>
> Problém 5: package
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af80b147c4
python-mitogen-0.2.8-1.el6
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-54cf4d603d
seamonkey-2.49.5-1.el6
The following builds
>>You're much better off including a couple of koji tasks/packages
>>showing the issue, it's much easier to get some real context.
>OK, here's one at least. I have had to manually add -DPIC to the spec for
>aarch64 in order to get>that arch to pass. There were no problems with it up
>until
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.62-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 06:27:56PM +0200, Chris Peters wrote:
> Maybe the code of conduct could politely nudge people towards *quality*
> over quantity (so that voices don't get drowned and big threads aren't so
> tiresome to keep up with)
I don't think that's a job for the code of conduct.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:43 PM Timothée Floure
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a follow-up email for some "coffee discussions" we had at flock a few
> weeks ago. Sorry for the delay!
>
> The Fedora community contains a lot of university students, many of us
> packaging tools for their
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.62-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On 8/30/19 6:54 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:58 AM Muneendra Kumar M via devel
> wrote:
>> I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
>> Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
>
> I'm on the same boat. It's been at least
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 06:54:48PM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> Workstation is only the primary product because somebody decided GNOME was
> the best default. This should be reconsidered, so that the various Spins,
This is backwards. We (the Fedora Board) at the time, asked for a team to
develop
>On Friday, August 30, 2019, 07:45:19 AM EDT, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>>
>> Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
>> flags in aarch64.
>>
>> Something is amiss there. A small snippet
On 8/30/19 8:25 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
But wouldn't 24:00/23:59 be even better than 18:00? And changing from 00:00
to 24:00 wouldn't even require changing the actual time (as changing to
18:00 does), just the way it is announced.
That is a little confusing in my opinion.
I would like to
Am 26.08.19 um 10:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> python-cairosvg orphan, ralph 3 weeks ago
I can take python-cairosvg as I need it for weasyprint (which I hope to update
in the next weeks).
releng ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8716
Felix
Will do first thing next week :)
> On 30 Aug 2019, at 21:14, Simon Pichugin wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> there are few PRs on review from me. Please, check...
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50551
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50570
>
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:58 AM Muneendra Kumar M via devel
wrote:
> I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
> Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
I'm on the same boat. It's been at least ~5 hours since I added the
keys to FAS and I'm still not able
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 09:06, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:51:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 07:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Maximilian Philipps wrote:
> > > > It has now been several months
Hello,
I'm planning to update exempi to version 2.5.1 in rawhide, and it
includes a SONAME change from "libexempi.so.3" to "libexempi.so.8".
Affected packages are:
caja
eog
eom
equalx
nemo
tellico
tracker-miners
I've rebuilt all of them in Copr [1] without issues, except tellico,
which failed
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:51:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 07:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Maximilian Philipps wrote:
> > > It has now been several months since the release of RHEL 8 and I am
> > > still struggling to
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 07:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Maximilian Philipps wrote:
> > It has now been several months since the release of RHEL 8 and I am
> > still struggling to get a RHEL 8 into an usable state. Besides the
> > already mentioned absence of
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:55 AM Chris Peters wrote:
>
> PS I won't take this thread any further. The irony of a back and forth in
> the back and forth thread doesn't escape me!
>
>
That's hilarious and true. I was thinking the exact same thing...
___
You just explained exactly why it was different ;-)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 9:23 PM John Harris wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 5:09:23 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > It's somewhat ironic that Discourse would solve this issue. As I
> > previously mentioned, I also don't like having
Dne 23. 08. 19 v 18:20 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> There's nothing you can do, releng needs to rebuild modules:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8664
>
Is this error:
Problém 5: package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires
libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190829.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190830.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:11
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.43 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 13:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
> > > the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
> > > on the date
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:41 PM, John Harris wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:12:22 AM MST Dan Book wrote:
>> I would agree, but people do install multiple desktops after installing a
>> spin. Such a use case needs to be considered (not sure if it matters,
>> though).
>
> This is
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
>> the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
>> on the date when people are awake. I'll float the idea to releng and
>> then
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM Philip Kovacs via devel
wrote:
>
> Several of us are getting errors in our c++ packages related to missing PIC
> flags in aarch64.
>
> Something is amiss there. A small snippet from openmpi:
You're much better off including a couple of koji tasks/packages
On 28. 08. 19 19:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 27. 08. 19 22:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide only.
As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more.
Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
11 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED:
John Harris wrote:
> Thing is, binding a port and expecting it to be open to every network
> interface you've got are two very different things.
Once again John Harris is completely wrong. The bind system call is
precisely how a program specifies which network interfaces it wants to
open a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Maximilian Philipps wrote:
> It has now been several months since the release of RHEL 8 and I am
> still struggling to get a RHEL 8 into an usable state. Besides the
> already mentioned absence of fail2ban and nagios plugins I am now facing
> the lack of
Hi team,
there are few PRs on review from me. Please, check...
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50551
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50570
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50573
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50579
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
On Friday, August 30, 2019 8:44:39 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd.
Panu said that the backport would be almost trivial:
https://lists.pagure.io/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4EFFNJNVAP35KH74N3W5GC4E2AQXC7V/
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 11:17:18 PM CEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:43:53 AM CEST Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 6/4/19 9:56 AM, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dne
hi,
It has now been several months since the release of RHEL 8 and I am
still struggling to get a RHEL 8 into an usable state. Besides the
already mentioned absence of fail2ban and nagios plugins I am now facing
the lack of perl-LDAP.
In RHEL 7 perl-LDAP was part of the base repo, in RHEL 8 it
I use the gmail android app and on desktop I use the gmail web interface.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:19 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 8/27/19 8:36 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Regarding NNTP I've haven't used newsreaders in years and to be honest
>
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 10:08 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
> > the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
> > on the date when people are awake. I'll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-3d48221f72 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3d48221f72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-79a7e5d478 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-79a7e5d478
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:36 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 25. 08. 19 v 14:06 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than
> > > three years
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747380
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of
perl-Net-DNS-1.21-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747380
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1609816
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1609816=edit
[patch] Update to 1.21 (#1747380)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747380
Bug ID: 1747380
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.21 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-23e8b01f66 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-23e8b01f66
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747182
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi Jacob,
I have added the ssh key in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts
Will it take sometime to propagate the keys ?
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelen [mailto:jje...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 2:18 PM
To: Muneendra Kumar M ; Development
> Hi Jacob,
> Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
>
> And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we
> have in pagure.io .
You have to add the ssh key to your FAS account.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:15 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
> Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
>
> And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key
> as we
> have in pagure.io .
That is the reason why I pointed you to the Fedora Account page, where
Hi Jacob,
Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd).
And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we
have in pagure.io .
Regards,
Muneendra.
-Original Message-
From: Jakub Jelen [mailto:jje...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 1:34 PM
To:
On 30/08/2019 09:03, Jakub Jelen wrote:
Other possibility (if you are not a packager of the given package), is
to use anonymous http clone using -a switch:
$ fedpkg clone -a fctxpd
So long as you are in the packager group you can clone any
package without having to use -a you just can't push
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747118
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-511f869511 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-511f869511
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 12:50 +0530, Muneendra Kumar M via devel wrote:
> Hi ,
> Iam getting the below error when I run fedpkg clone fctxpd
>
>
> fedpkg clone fctxpd
> Cloning into 'fctxpd'...
> The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)'
> can't be
> established.
> RSA key
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747118
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi ,
Iam getting the below error when I run fedpkg clone fctxpd
fedpkg clone fctxpd
Cloning into 'fctxpd'...
The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't be
established.
RSA key fingerprint is SHA256:Q12OTyTeOHWlS54dTzy2BNu7wB8UKNf18+7WHIDsORc.
Are you sure you want to
On 8/29/19 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'd support changing the freeze dates to be something more like 18:00UTC
the date they are listed. That would give people more time/be actually
on the date when people are awake. I'll float the idea to releng and
then fesco.
That would be awesome.
It's
Dne 29. 08. 19 v 18:58 Kamil Dudka napsal(a):
> What is the recommended way to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a RHEL-7 host?
I think that no one contemplate supporting RHEL 7 regarding zstd. The real
thing is "how to build Fedora 31+ RPMs on a
RHEL-8 host"?
Hello,
I've orphaned all my Java packages and my plan is to retire them next week,
if no one wants them. There is many of them, but all (except last 2 in the
list) were added to the distribution as dependencies of Jenkins package.
Thanks,
Michal
rpms/jenkins
90 matches
Mail list logo
