[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

2019-09-30 Thread nils
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-10-01 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](https://docs.pagure.o

Re: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report

2019-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 00:13 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 5/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) > > New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190928.n.0): > > ID: 460875Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical > URL:

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190930.n.1 changes

2019-09-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-31-20190928.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 145 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 67 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.56 GiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora-31-20190930.n.1 compose check report

2019-09-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190928.n.0): ID: 460875 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/460875 ID: 460896 Test: x86_64 KDE

Re: Problem with F30 module packages that are built in F32 buildroot (?)

2019-09-30 Thread Till Hofmann
On 9/23/19 1:42 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote: We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot. BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754167 Here's the build: https://koji.fedorapr

Re: CPE Team Weekly Update

2019-09-30 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 9/27/19 9:18 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > I’d like to introduce myself first, my name is Aoife Moloney and I recently > started with the Community Platform Engineering (CPE) team. My role within > this team is going to be a hybrid role of a Product Owner / Project Manager.

Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On Monday, 30 September 2019 11:19:56 CEST Ricardo Bánffy wrote: > Slightly changing subjects, I'd like to know how do people package > fonts. I make one, that a brave soul packages for Debian distros, but > it doesn't have a RPM counterpart. > I added a few samples I've reviewed these past years

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Guido Aulisi
Il giorno ven, 27/09/2019 alle 08.31 +, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > On 2019-09-26, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > > Pull requests are great for proposing your changes to foreign > packages. > It does not make sense when maintaining the code.

Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches

2019-09-30 Thread Tim Jackson
On 30/09/2019 21:02, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Tim Jackson wrote: Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package (co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches? branch ownership died 2-3 years ago. a replacement was asked

Re: Finding out ownership of packages & branches

2019-09-30 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Tim Jackson wrote: > > Old, irregular maintainer here; apologies if this is a stupid question. > > Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package > (co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches? > > I looked pretty much everywhere

Re: Minimization Objective report

2019-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:16:52PM -, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Is this a perfectly drop-in compatible replacement from a user point of > > view? > The user that executes "grep -P"? Not many changes. Usually a corner > cases that have a different performance or exhibit bug fixes. Yeah, that's the

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:02:48AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Where does Communishift fit in here? I didn't see it mentioned. An excellent question! Basically the answer is that it's still to be determined. We may just ship it before the main move, so it would be down for shipping time + racking

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:19:58AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 27. 09. 19 v 23:55 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > And explicitly some things will NOT be available during that window: > > Copr build system will be unavailable too. Well, I guess it's kind of not decided yet there. It depends on w

Finding out ownership of packages & branches

2019-09-30 Thread Tim Jackson
Old, irregular maintainer here; apologies if this is a stupid question. Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package (co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches? I looked pretty much everywhere I could think of, including the following: - https://src.

Re: HEADS-UP: Asciidoctor 2.0.10

2019-09-30 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 29/09/19 16:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I wrote: >> I'm planning to push asciidoctor-2.0.10 to rawhide in the >> next few days. > > This has now been built and should show up in the next > rawhide compose. Tried rebuilding booth to see if there will be any differences in the generated ma

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Jun Aruga
> There's also a video about it from Flock 2019: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phCHilTEQb4&list=PL0x39xti0_64C75dRUuwlXlfYRgjgdEP4&index=8&t=0s Thanks. But why is the video mode "Unlisted" not public? -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Pavel Valena
- Original Message - > From: "Jun Aruga" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure" > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 4:54:55 PM > Subject: Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments > > > > Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Co

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)

2019-09-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-09-30) = Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:12 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-30/fesco.2019-09-30-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: can we merge package.cfg into master ?

2019-09-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2019-09-28 at 15:18 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 9/27/19 10:29 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > epel 8 brings a new file called package.cfg, I strongly

Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"

2019-09-30 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno lun, 30/09/2019 alle 18.37 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > Isaac Boukris is working on fixing Samba: > https://gitlab.com/samba-team/devel/samba/commits/iboukris_no_des_mit_118 > > but this is work in progress and does not pass full tests yet. > Ok, thanks. -- Dario Lesca (invi

Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"

2019-09-30 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 30 syys 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: I have fill this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757071 This error happen into my test Samba DC MIT Kerberos environment If you suggest to me some trick I can test it There is no a trick yet because DES is deprecated and removed in the

Re: Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"

2019-09-30 Thread Robbie Harwood
Dario Lesca writes: > I have fill this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757071 > > This error happen into my test Samba DC MIT Kerberos environment > If you suggest to me some trick I can test it Single-DES support has been removed from krb5 as per https://fedoraproject.org/

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Robbie Harwood
"Michael J Gruber" writes: > There is the current worklflow and the current mindset. One influences > the other. > > For a long-time gitter, the prevailing Fedora packager mindset is > still very much "dist-cvs". dist-git is often used as merely a tool to > drive "dist-something", not so much as

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Jun Aruga
> > Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Communishift" in plain > > English? > > Communishift is the OpenShift cluster that Infra runs for > community-run applications[1]. Its name is a portmanteau of > "Community" and "OpenShift". > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/

Reminder: Summer time changes in the next few weeks

2019-09-30 Thread Ben Cotton
As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure to check your recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know when you're meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and others are set to a part

Re: Minimization Objective report

2019-09-30 Thread James Cassell
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2019-09-27, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:52:31PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > >> == pcre -> pcre2 == > >> Moving grep (one of the last packages using pcre) to pcre2. [4] > > > > Is this a perfectly drop-in compatible

hypre soname bump in rawhide

2019-09-30 Thread Dave Love
I'll be updating hypre in rawhide with a soname bump. (That is already in epel8, where the dependencies were being built anyhow.) I've mailed the maintainer of the dependencies but haven't heard back. petsc and sundials2 will rebuild, and I assume sundials will when the current rawhide FTBFS is f

Fedora 31: Samba DC: "setup_kerberos_keys: generation of a des-cbc-md5 key failed: Bad encryption type"

2019-09-30 Thread Dario Lesca
I have fill this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757071 This error happen into my test Samba DC MIT Kerberos environment If you suggest to me some trick I can test it Thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 30 Workstation) ___

Re: Self Introduction: Brian Sipos

2019-09-30 Thread Brian Sipos
Dominik, Thank you. The first application-facing library that I ran into being missing from EPEL-8 is GDAL, which has been present in the Fedora repos for many years. It appears that the issue is more to do with available dependency packages than the library build itself. Specifically Doxygen i

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Ben Cotton
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 9:29 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > > Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Communishift" in plain > English? Communishift is the OpenShift cluster that Infra runs for community-run applications[1]. Its name is a portmanteau of "Community" and "OpenShift". [1] https://

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Jun Aruga
HI Ben, > Where does Communishift fit in here? I didn't see it mentioned. Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Communishift" in plain English? As I am not a native English speaker, I do not understand the actual meaning. Maybe does it mean a kind of behavior? -- Jun | He - His - Him

Re: Minimization Objective report

2019-09-30 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2019-09-27, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:52:31PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: >> == pcre -> pcre2 == >> Moving grep (one of the last packages using pcre) to pcre2. [4] > > Is this a perfectly drop-in compatible replacement from a user point of > view? > The user that execute

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Ben Cotton
Where does Communishift fit in here? I didn't see it mentioned. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190930.n.0 changes

2019-09-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190928.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 108 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 34.95 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-09-30)

2019-09-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-09-30 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 09. 19 13:41, Fabio Valentini wrote: stewardship-sig: relaxngDatatype, isorelax, relaxngcc No idea who orphaned these packages (or when), since there was no announcement, but I have requested ownership for me + the stewardship-sig. relaxngDatatype was maintained by mizdebsk, mbooth, dbh

Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0 compose check report

2019-09-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.clo

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:54 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedorapro

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2019-09-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Matthias Runge
On 27/09/2019 00:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 26. 09. 19 22:06, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "C" == Christopher  writes: C> With version-controlled package sources, changelogs in SPEC seem so C> obsolete to me. They are already problematic today when they conflict C> due to changes in multiple b

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Michael J Gruber
There is the current worklflow and the current mindset. One influences the other. For a long-time gitter, the prevailing Fedora packager mindset is still very much "dist-cvs". dist-git is often used as merely a tool to drive "dist-something", not so much as a vcs, and really rarely as a tool fo

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

2019-09-30 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 27. 09. 19 v 23:55 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): And explicitly some things will NOT be available during that window: Copr build system will be unavailable too. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ de

Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Ricardo Bánffy
Slightly changing subjects, I'd like to know how do people package fonts. I make one, that a brave soul packages for Debian distros, but it doesn't have a RPM counterpart. Any non-software package specific tutorials recommended? On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 8:20 AM Artur Iwicki wrote: > > I've never

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 9/27/19 5:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: On 9/26/19 10:05 PM, Jeremy Cline wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:57:56PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 14:49 +, Jeremy Cline wrote: The combination of these two makes no se

Self Introduction: Jérémy Bertozzi

2019-09-30 Thread Jérémy Bertozzi
Hello, My name is Jérémy Bertozzi. I have been working as a sysadmin for the last 10+ years, mainly on RHEL based systems. I have been packaging software into RPM for my job for quite some time now. I came accross a software called "upt"[1], and I realized it was not available on Fedora, so I go

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-30 Thread Michal Konecny
On 2019-09-27 17:46, Randy Barlow wrote: On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 10:26 +0200, Michal Konecny wrote: There is still possibility to use libraries.io instead of Anitya, but there are some issues: - lack of downstream mapping (this could be easily solved by some database with only downstream mapping

Re: Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Artur Iwicki
I've never maintained an icon theme package before, but I like the Paper icons, so I guess I could adopt this. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Cond

Orphaned paper-icon-theme

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "paper-icon-theme" package. I no longer use it and have no interest in maintaining it further. The package is up-to-date with the latest upstream release (though the upstream project is pretty much dead now). Fabio _

Orphaned libfixposix (leaf package)

2019-09-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I've just orphaned the "libfixposix" package. It used to be a dependency of one of my other packages, but it is no longer required. No more fedora packages depend on it. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu