On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 00:44 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> One of the tedious things I do as a package maintainer is re-building
> all dependent packages with a new version of a package. My current work
> flow is:
>
> - create a testing copr
> - build the new package there
> - Figure out what packages
On 10/6/19 3:28 PM, Thomas via devel wrote:
Is this the place to send Fedora 31 observations?
I've set the regional setting 'Formats' via settings to
Denmark(English). The Denmark(English) setting specifies ISO 8601 time
and date format.
However, the top bar time continues to show a differe
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:14 pm, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Is there any way to check if this was due to an OOM condition?
In my experience, that error is always the OOM killer.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Jun Aruga wrote:
> But in case of module, each developer can create any branch
> technically under their responsibility,
And that is the issue, really.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
One of the tedious things I do as a package maintainer is re-building
all dependent packages with a new version of a package. My current work
flow is:
- create a testing copr
- build the new package there
- Figure out what packages depend on this package - some flavor of:
dnf repoquery --what
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20191005.n.0):
ID: 464009 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/464009
ID: 464022 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
Is this the place to send Fedora 31 observations?
I've set the regional setting 'Formats' via settings to Denmark(English).
The Denmark(English) setting specifies ISO 8601 time and date format.
However, the top bar time continues to show a different date format, even
after reboot.
I.e. on the US
cc1plus is getting killed consistently in build builds of paraview 5.7.0
on ppc64le for Fedora 30+:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:2823342: Warning: end of file not at end of a line;
newline inserted
c++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
compilation
OLD: Fedora-31-20191005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 628.15 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> It says: package python3-3.7.4-5.fc31.armv7hl is excluded
> I don't know why would it be. How do i debug why it gets excluded?
> Only python36 and python38 was excluded, not python37.
...and I dug into this and found that we were c
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 4
Size of added packages: 82.52 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 1:12 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, 15:07 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> Couple of my updates have e-mailed me $subj. Is it something to worry about?
>
>
> I got this too for a lot of my updates, just a few hours ago. I assumed it
> was caused by some kind o
> So Modularity will happily unleash experimental branches that were never
intended to be released onto unsuspecting users of stable releases? How can
this not be an absolute showstopper? This failed Modularity experiment needs
to end NOW!
As far as I know, there was no rule for the branch name, f
On 06. 10. 19 14:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 10. 19 1:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Python-Classroom:
``
[pungi.global.log](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-31-20191005.n.0/compose/../logs/global/pungi.global.log)
- [38066743](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
Done, and thank you. I thought I was losing my mind!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758891
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:35 AM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
>
> I am the maintainer of the netatalk package. It has an optional build
> dependency on tracker-devel, but this subpackage does not currently exist in
> el8 repos.
>
> The primary package, tracker-2.1.5-1.el8, can be installed, but I need the
I am the maintainer of the netatalk package. It has an optional build
dependency on tracker-devel, but this subpackage does not currently exist in
el8 repos.
The primary package, tracker-2.1.5-1.el8, can be installed, but I need the
header files from -devel. I've extracted the spec file from t
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019, 15:07 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Couple of my updates have e-mailed me $subj. Is it something to worry
> about?
>
I got this too for a lot of my updates, just a few hours ago. I assumed it
was caused by some kind of server glitch, maybe related to the current koji
outage.
Fabio
Couple of my updates have e-mailed me $subj. Is it something to worry about?
Example: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f2ffe568a1
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On 06. 10. 19 1:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Python-Classroom:
``
[pungi.global.log](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-31-20191005.n.0/compose/../logs/global/pungi.global.log)
- [38066743](https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38066743)
```
[LIVE_IMAGES ] [E
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 8:26 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> On 10/3/19 12:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 11:13:32AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>> Remote changelog URLs might become inaccessible over time, making
> >>> tracking down
> >>> behavior chan
On 06.10.2019 10:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I don't see anything about it not being allowed
Electron is a full Chromium core with nodejs engine, which contains
ffmpeg library. If you want to redistribute it in official repositories,
you must resolve all legal issues with bundled Chromium by strippin
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 12:17:17 AM CEST Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know how many of you are Vim users and what fraction of those
> use plugins. Anyway, there is a great, well-known plugin called
> vim-fugitive (by notorious Tim Pope), that provides a lot of cool
> features. My f
Il dom 6 ott 2019, 10:09 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> ha scritto:
> On 06.10.2019 09:08, Germano Massullo wrote:
> > I would like to package OnlyOffice Desktop Editors [1]
>
> Packaging of Electron is not allowed:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Electron
The webpage
On 10/6/19 1:08 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2019 09:08, Germano Massullo wrote:
I would like to package OnlyOffice Desktop Editors [1]
Packaging of Electron is not allowed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Electron
I don't see anything about it not being allowed. It's just th
On 06.10.2019 09:08, Germano Massullo wrote:
> I would like to package OnlyOffice Desktop Editors [1]
Packaging of Electron is not allowed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Electron
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing
I would like to package OnlyOffice Desktop Editors [1], but since it
is the first time I see a Github tree very particular like this one, I
don't know what effort would be required for packaging.
What do you think about?
[1]: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors
___
28 matches
Mail list logo
