On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:00 AM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:46:52 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modules_In_Non-Modular_Buildroot
> >
> > Enable module default streams in the buildroot repository for modular
> > and non-modular R
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:20:01AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 05:53:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > There has been a shrinking packager problem for years due to multiple
> > problems
>
> Has there? I'm not really seeing a significant change in the number of
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:46:52 PM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modules_In_Non-Modular_Buildroot
>
> Enable module default streams in the buildroot repository for modular
> and non-modular RPMs.
>
> == Summary ==
> This Change (colloquially referred to as "
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:58 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> > These bugs exist in RHEL 8 as well as CentOS 8 based environments. Why do
> > you think that modularity will *ever* work this way?
>
> I don't know whether this question was aimed directly to me, but if so
> ... I am sorry, I can't help y
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I was hoping to have some of the folks who would be saddled with tons
> more work if this policy was enacted chime in, but I don't think any of
> them have. (ie, the people who have moved their packages to modules and
> have or are going to retire their non modular versions). W
> These bugs exist in RHEL 8 as well as CentOS 8 based environments. Why do you
> think that modularity will *ever* work this way?
I don't know whether this question was aimed directly to me, but if so
... I am sorry, I can't help you here. You will probably need to
talk directly to the modularit
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 13. 10. 19 19:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > > Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies
> > > > agreed upon for what modula
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 10. 19 19:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies
> > > agreed upon for what modularity is and isn't allowed for in Fedora:
> > > what are the rules
On 13. 10. 19 19:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ben Rosser wrote:
Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies
agreed upon for what modularity is and isn't allowed for in Fedora:
what are the rules for default streams, buildroot only modules,
modularizing non-leaf packages, etc.
Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 13/10/19 03:26, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Except sadly, it doesn't build:
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022
>> ...
>> * Running build
>> *
>> Fatal Python erro
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Just can fyi but at least two packages were missed in the updates:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a4f82aa58
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-80800c5c83
>
> I can rebuild both (I maintain hedgewars) but can someone rebuild and p
Ben Rosser wrote:
> Before things are rolled out further, I'd like to see some policies
> agreed upon for what modularity is and isn't allowed for in Fedora:
> what are the rules for default streams, buildroot only modules,
> modularizing non-leaf packages, etc.
So, to start that discussion, I thi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'm wary of assuming that this thread represents the whole of Fedoran
> > opinions, however. As we all know, it's generally the set of people who are
> > upset that speak up the loud
I would like to take ownership of the festival packages, which was recently
retired:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674883
I had already been working on updating the Festival package to a much
newer version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457878
Here
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 11:52 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> It will not be supported in Fedora 31. It was accidentally added to
> the original change and the change page subsequently updated to to
> remove the error but the email had already been sent.
Thanks Peter. I suppose that since raspbian is
On 10/13/19 4:39 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
I'm building a new package, graph-tools. The scratch build fails on rawhide
with:
```
annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wno-register -fopenmp -O3
-fvisibility=default -fvisib
Hello,
I'm building a new package, graph-tools. The scratch build fails on rawhide
with:
```
annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -Wno-register -fopenmp -O3
-fvisibility=default -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wno-deprecated -Wall -
OLD: Fedora-31-20191012.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191012.n.0):
ID: 468596 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/468596
ID: 468708 Test: x86_64 unive
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:54:33AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:41:52AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi
> > > upd
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191012.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 45 required tests failed, 3 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:41:52AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi update:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a4aa28b798.
> > Please give it
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a4aa28b798.
> Please give it karma so it can go to stable quickly.
>
> Zbyszek
I just tested and i
>
> The change proposal submitted here lists the Pi 4 among the supported
> devices, whereas the wiki page does not. I checked the
> SUPPORTED-BOARDS file in the accompanying documentation of
> arm-image-installer and there is no rpi4 in the list of target boards.
> Will the the Pi 4 be supported a
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Seems the f30 build wasn't tagged
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1390409
Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a4aa28b
Seems the f30 build wasn't tagged
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1390409
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://d
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Except sadly, it doesn't build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022
>
> ...
> * Running build
> *
> Fatal Python error: PyQt5.QtCore: Unable to embed qt.conf
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vEjk0u: line 31: 9198
Il 13/10/19 03:26, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Except sadly, it doesn't build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022
> ...
> * Running build
> *
> Fatal Python error: PyQt5.QtCore: Unable to embed qt.conf
> /
29 matches
Mail list logo
