No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 474257 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/474257
ID: 474319 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764422
Bug ID: 1764422
Summary: perl-Test-Compile-2.3.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Compile
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50669
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50670
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/10/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.2-20191022gitabc6f16.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 10/22/19 8:28 PM, William Brown wrote:
I think turbo mode was to try and shortcut returning to the conntable and then having the
blocking on the connections poll because the locking strategies before weren't as good. I
think there is still some value in turbo "for now" but if we can bring
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50668
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 31 Candidate RC-1.8 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
Oh! Okay, thanks, now I get it.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 21:37, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 20:32:18 +0200, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a question. How can we keep an eye on them?
>
> We meant the Fedora Join channels by "them" here. Sorry---wasn't
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764346
Bug ID: 1764346
Summary: perl-DBD-Mock-1.50 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Mock
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764346
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 20:32:18 +0200, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have a question. How can we keep an eye on them?
We meant the Fedora Join channels by "them" here. Sorry---wasn't
completely clear. :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
Hi!
I have a question. How can we keep an eye on them?
Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 03:07, wrote:
> Hello, as you can read here [1], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a
> new people focused workflow for newcomers.
>
> In two words: people willing to
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2019-10-23 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the
following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Am 20.10.19 um 13:30 schrieb Felix Schwarz:
Am 19.10.19 um 19:38 schrieb Jamie Nguyen:
jasmine: 1
I can take jasmine. FAS user "fschwarz".
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Florian Weimer wrote:
> But it leads to the strange situation that we can recommend to install
> ffmpeg if it is bundled with some proprietary software, but cannot do so
> if it is part of a free software repository.
Considering that FFmpeg is LGPL-licensed, I think recommending proprietary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764217
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-e96dc23d23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e96dc23d23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764217
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764045
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On 22. 10. 19 15:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I only see RHEL shipping 1 version of lua and that is 5.3. I don't see
any lua51 packaged up anywhere so wouldn't that also need to be done?
There is already a compat-lua in EPEL8
Thanks.. I was looking for the wrong name scheme. My
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 09:34, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:06 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 06:27, Tomas Krizek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build lua-http package for EPEL8, which has lua-lpeg as a
> > > dependency.
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764217
Bug ID: 1764217
Summary: perl-SQL-Interp-1.25 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SQL-Interp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:06 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 06:27, Tomas Krizek wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build lua-http package for EPEL8, which has lua-lpeg as a
> > dependency.
> >
> > While lua-lpeg was maintained in EPEL7, it was moved to the base
>
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 11:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:59:30AM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> > FYI: FESCO ticket was created
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2246
>
> Yeah, and we had a bit more discussion there, which we probibly
> should
> have just had
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 06:27, Tomas Krizek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build lua-http package for EPEL8, which has lua-lpeg as a
> dependency.
>
> While lua-lpeg was maintained in EPEL7, it was moved to the base
> distribution with RHEL8.
>
> The issue is there are two versions of lua - 5.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764045
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Thanks.
Hope to see it in repos soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi,
I'm trying to build lua-http package for EPEL8, which has lua-lpeg as a
dependency.
While lua-lpeg was maintained in EPEL7, it was moved to the base
distribution with RHEL8.
The issue is there are two versions of lua - 5.3 and 5.1. And I need the
package for both lua versions. This is how
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764045
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763668
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-6a3e3fcaef has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a3e3fcaef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708214
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to |Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to
Hey,
Some time ago, I've packaged python-ripozo because I thought it's useful.
However it's just a Python library nothing in Fedora uses and I don't have any
interest and time to maintain such packages any more.
I've orphaned it.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:32:22PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2019/10/22 14:46:
> >On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:18:06AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>Bugzilla is reporting the following error for the slim package:
> >>%systemd_postun
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:40:55 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
>python2-typingchandankumar, orphan 5 weeks ago
I'll take this one as it's a dependency of python2-dns, which is a
dependency of my trac-spamfilter-plugin package.
Paul.
On 22. 10. 19 9:07, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
Miro Hrončok píše v Po 21. 10. 2019 v 19:40 +0200:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764043
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764043
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Version|epel7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764041
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764045
Bug ID: 1764045
Summary: perl-XML-Dumper needed for epel8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-Dumper
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764041
Bug ID: 1764041
Summary: perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS needed for epel8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764043
Bug ID: 1764043
Summary: perl-JSON-XS needed for epel8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-JSON-XS
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
No need to apologize, noone ever can know all possible problems in advance.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 19:41 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:59, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello EPEL maintainers and users,
> >
> > I've found today that epel8 builds are mangling python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744842
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497
--- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
Please take also el6 branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2019/10/22 14:46:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:18:06AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Hi,
Bugzilla is reporting the following error for the slim package:
%systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument
I looked online a bit and could not
46 matches
Mail list logo
