The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
438 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
180 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
178
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-be9b8a3985
wordpress-5.1.3-1.el6
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5dfb2dbe75
proftpd-1.3.3g-11.el6
The following builds have
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/10/27/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.2-20191026git30ae2d7.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765886
Bug ID: 1765886
Summary: Please provide EPEL8 package
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-LockFile-Simple
Assignee: andr...@bawue.net
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
SuperLUMT-3.1.0-24.el8
java-latest-openjdk-13.0.1.9-2.rolling.el8
perl-Data-Taxi-0.96-25.el8
perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.24-13.el8
perl-IO-Handle-Util-0.02-5.el8
soci-4.0.0-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744712
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765523
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi everyone,
It seems that the file at
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm now
errors out with a 403. It's either missing or forbidden. That is the path
used is most online documentation and the path does like EPEL 6-7.
Is that expected?
Thanks!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760112
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756029
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758719
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760111
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> What do you mean by "disallowing" default streams? Do you mean
> removing them from Fedora?
1. Preventing the creation of new default streams. Use the non-modular
branches instead.
AND THEN
2. Retiring all existing default streams, merging them back into the
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The ideal behavior would be for there to be UX that lets users know
> that if they enable one of these streams, it's
> unsupported/unsupportable (such as if they tried to use a
> stripped-down version of a build tool). The module streams have a
> "description" field that
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> By all means, if there are user experience problems, highlight those. Just
> don't draw the conclusion that the whole system is unsalvageable. Let the
> team that's working on it figure out if there's a way to fix the UX or if
> it truly does mean that a structural flaw
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 6:18 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > I think retrace service is running on RHEL 7.7 server and since we have
> > zstd rpms in Fedora 31 [0], it won't work. I don't know what's the ETA for
> > fix, I can ask on Tuesday, if there is any update on this issue.
>
> It's a
> I think retrace service is running on RHEL 7.7 server and since we have zstd
> rpms in Fedora 31 [0], it won't work. I don't know what's the ETA for fix, I
> can ask on Tuesday, if there is any update on this issue.
It's a problem on RHEL-8 too then.
> Until then, you'll probably have to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765870
Bug ID: 1765870
Summary: perl-List-SomeUtils-0.58 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-List-SomeUtils
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128980
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
Flags|
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:41 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our
> > > > “First” foundation.
> > >
> > > Simple reason - while Oracle decided to move Java to
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 8:33 AM Javier Martinez Canillas <
jav...@dowhile0.org> wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:23 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I removed it from my system and I'm about to reboot :)
>
> Yes, it's OK to remove the grub2-pc package on an EFI system.
>
One
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838679
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
--- Comment #8 from
Hi,
I think retrace service is running on RHEL 7.7 server and since we have
zstd rpms in Fedora 31 [0], it won't work. I don't know what's the ETA for
fix, I can ask on Tuesday, if there is any update on this issue.
Until then, you'll probably have to generate stack traces locally :/
[0]
Am 26.10.19 um 15:47 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
You should always be able to create the update "manually" by not using the
search entry, but pasting the build NVR (and bugs, if you have any) manually.
Thanks - I was able to create the update by doing that.
Felix
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:23:33PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our “First”
> > > foundation.
> >
> > Simple reason - while Oracle decided to move Java to a faster, time
> > based release cycle the Java community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763313
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1762233
Referenced Bugs:
Hi all,
It seems with F-31 on x86_64 the retrace service seems to fail every
single time I try to submit a crash report, is there known issues with
the service?
Peter
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:07 PM Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> >> for some more time...
> >
> > Any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762233
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762253
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1762233
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765856
Bug ID: 1765856
Summary: perl-Pod-Simple-3.40 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Simple
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762930
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1763637
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1762930
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763664
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.03- |perl-Date-Holidays-DE-2.03-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761523
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-TCP-2.22-1.fc30 |perl-Test-TCP-2.22-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Term-Table-0.014-1.fc3 |perl-Term-Table-0.014-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760071
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760159
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756564
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759731
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760037
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758970
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-TCP-2.21-1.fc29 |perl-Test-TCP-2.21-1.fc29
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756927
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 19:07 Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
> >
> > Any reasons?
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:59:27 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>
> Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our First
>
On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:33:59 -0400, you wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>>
>
>If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
>Java 8 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763664
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
Emmanuel, could you take this one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763667
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ...
Sorry, typo: it should be "mufti11" 8-(
I'm available for any review in exchange.
My initial
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765033
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.026-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760397
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.026-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711098
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Convert-UUlib-1.6-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765422
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99.026-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On 10/26/19 4:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>>
>
> If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
> Java 8 has been EOL for
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 5:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we've been recently approached by a colleague from Red Hat working on
> performance (CCed).
>
> According to their testing, Fedora Python performance could be improved by
> ~15%
> by building /usr/bin/python* statically with
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
> some more time...
>
If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11 by default.
Java 8 has been EOL for a while now.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 15:54 Jiri Vanek wrote:
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least
> for some more time...
>
Would you care to elaborate why?
Fabio
>
> On 10/25/19 8:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
> some more time...
Any reasons? Defaulting to ancient software conflicts with our “First”
foundation.
--
Tomasz Torcz "Never
any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
some more time...
On 10/25/19 8:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 10. 19 19:30, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Currently default Java runtime in Fedora is OpenJDK 8. This is not the
>> latest OpenJDK
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 15:22 Felix Schwarz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow I'm unable to create a new update for my new package
> "python-cssselect2" (F31) and I'd like to know why.
>
> When I go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new and I enter
> "python-cssselect2" in the "packages" field,
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 15:21 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow I'm unable to create a new update for my new package
> "python-cssselect2" (F31) and I'd like to know why.
>
> When I go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new and I enter
> "python-cssselect2" in the "packages"
Hello Richard,
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:23 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> The grub2-pc package doesn't seem to do anything except provide a broken link
> in /etc to grub2.cfg...
>
You are correct, the package is only needed for legacy BIOS installs.
There was a bug in Anaconda that caused
Hi,
somehow I'm unable to create a new update for my new package
"python-cssselect2" (F31) and I'd like to know why.
When I go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new and I enter
"python-cssselect2" in the "packages" field, bodhi says "unable to find any
package…".
Bodhi only shows
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 13:08 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:27 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable
> releases if
> > > > this change is done globally and for example if Ursa Major/Prime/...
> is activated?
>
The grub2-pc package doesn't seem to do anything except provide a broken
link in /etc to grub2.cfg...
ll /etc/grub2.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 May 20 12:19 /etc/grub2.cfg ->
../boot/grub2/grub.cfg
The /boot/grub2/grub.cfg must be a %ghost entry in the rpm as the file
doesn't actually exist:
Do you know when it'll be ready? How much progress? And some days ago
Firefox 70 released. Will new IceCat be shipped with Firefox 70?
On 10/26/19 2:15 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi.
> Glad to hear your interest about IceCat.
>
> IceCat-68.2.0 is still not entirely ready for stable releases:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable
> > > releases if
> > > this change is done globally and for example if Ursa Major/Prime/... is
> > > activated?
> >
> > Changing underlying OpenJDK version of
Hi.
Glad to hear your interest about IceCat.
IceCat-68.2.0 is still not entirely ready for stable releases: some
features like personalized "about:icecat" homepage and privacy
protection addons are not properly working/recognized yet.
On 25/10/19 23:55, Alireza Hayati wrote:
> Hello. I don't
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
I also cannot find the "muftii"
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the
"fedora-review: +" flag if the
Hi,
Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
I'm available for any review in exchange.
My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv.
There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-55ba7663e0
yara-3.11.0-1.el6
10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-be9b8a3985
wordpress-5.1.3-1.el6
5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711098
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Convert-UUlib-1.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
81 matches
Mail list logo
