On 11/1/19 1:47 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
Flat pack should be doing a requires(post): selinux-policy-base
To make sure it is installed before flatpack.
Thanks. The proper incantation actually though seems to be:
%{?selinux_requires}
which contains that. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/S
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I'm planning to make Maven modules parallel-installable with ursine
> packages - maven-3.6 module would not have any conflicts with any
> ursine packages. The required packaging work is already done,
> parallel-installable PoC of Maven 3.6 is available from MBI repos [1].
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there
> a
> reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
> than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
>
Le ven. 1 nov. 2019 à 16:40, Martin Kolman a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 15:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Rpmfusion can't ship blender due to our non-replacement policy, fedora
> > should consider dropping their crippled
> > package.
> While it is certainly missing some functionality, I
This has been solved for Java versions, for gcc release, for databases, and for
multiple python releases. /etc/alternatives mostly works, compat libraries
work, SCL installs work. Let’s avoid inventing another packaging and naming
scheme for this, we’re only just recovering from “modularity”.
S
I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there a
reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
least adding (conditional) redirects and/or links to the "old"
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2019-11-04
# Time: ** 16:00 UTC **
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't get a community update last week and we have some proposals
to check in on, so let's
Hi Joe,
On 01/11/2019 07:06, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> It's been incredible to part of this project and community! :-)
>>
>> Once upon a time I was an (over?)enthusiastic packager and it's left me
>> with ownership of 300+ packages. O_o
>
Flat pack should be doing a requires(post): selinux-policy-base
To make sure it is installed before flatpack.
On 11/1/19 2:51 PM, Tim Zabel wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 12:02 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> My F31 kickstart install is failing with:
>>
>> DNF error: Error in POSTIN scriptlet in
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 12:02 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> My F31 kickstart install is failing with:
>
> DNF error: Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package flatpak-selinux
Hmm, I've also ran into this issue of flatpak-selinux's POSTIN failing
:(
Just to be sure, are you building the kickstart
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:18 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 08:06 +0900, Tetsuji Rai wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been using Fedora for a long time, but I was at lost to see there's
> > no beignet supported in Fedora 30. But fortunately, archlinux had
> > source patches for
My F31 kickstart install is failing with:
DNF error: Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package flatpak-selinux
This is because flapak-selinux installs a SELinux module in %post:
%post selinux
%selinux_modules_install %{_datadir}/selinux/packages/flatpak.pp.bz2
which sources /etc/selinux/config.
On 11/1/19 9:19 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
For example, for tk, the commit says:
2014-05-21 Added noautobuild, tcl/tk-8.6 cannot be automatically
rebuild now
..
But the package was rebuilt couple times in the last 5 years actually.
I'm going to file
Hi everyone,
Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail!
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
othe
On 11/1/19 4:49 AM, Billa Surendra wrote:
I am trying to boot fedora with qemu, but I am getting error. I have
downloaded Fedora-Developer-Rawhide-20190126.n.0-sda1.raw and
fw_payload-uboot-qemu-virt-smode.elf, trying to boot using qemu. Please can any
one suggest me how to do.
Where did yo
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 15:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Rpmfusion can't ship blender due to our non-replacement policy, fedora should
> consider dropping their crippled
> package.
While it is certainly missing some functionality, I would not call it cripled -
it is for example perfectly usable fo
Rpmfusion can't ship blender due to our non-replacement policy, fedora should
consider dropping their crippled package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
The deed has been done.
- A
- Original Message -
> From: "Alex Scheel"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 9:21:35 AM
> Subject: Java Package Orphanings
>
> All,
>
> In the process of unorphaning resteasy, I picked up several other
Hello,
Is there a policy regarding the inclusion of header files in Python
packages? Should they be moved to a -devel sub package in these cases?
I see that numpy includes them for example:
$ rpmls python3-numpy | grep \\.h
-rw-r--r--
/usr/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/
Hi Pete,
On Friday, 2019-11-01 12:50:04 +, Pete Walter wrote:
> I just updated icu from 63.2 to 65.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname
> bump, but as usual, I've included a compat package providing the old soname
> to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that
case and proceed with normal FTBS policy [0] if it fails.
I think you are right Martin. Blender has no runtime settings that I am
aware of for codecs.
- Mehdi
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, 4:19 PM Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:51 +, long27km wrote:
>
> Why isn't there an option to install other repos codecs and impls ( i know
> the technic
Hello,
What group are you looking to join?
If you are attempting to subscribe to the mailing list(s) (you probably are
subscribed since your e-mail came through), you can do so here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https
Hi,
I just updated icu from 63.2 to 65.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump,
but as usual, I've included a compat package providing the old soname to not
break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is
expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the weekend.
H
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:51 +, long27km wrote:
> Why isn't there an option to install other repos codecs and impls ( i know
> the technical answer) ? I thought Fedora
> was now supposed to be focused on being developer friendly. Dev's could just
> install another distro of the os that
> allow
billa.iitmad...@gmail.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: h
I am trying to boot fedora with qemu, but I am getting error. I have
downloaded Fedora-Developer-Rawhide-20190126.n.0-sda1.raw and
fw_payload-uboot-qemu-virt-smode.elf, trying to boot using qemu. Please can any
one suggest me how to do.
error:
billa@billa:~/MDP/fedora$ qemu-system-riscv64
On 29/10/2019 17:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
sham1
ledger
(BuildRequires: boost-python2-devel → boost-numpy2 → PY2)
This has been fixed now.
- Jani
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
It includes code over which various people claim to have patents
and RedHat don't want to get sued by the owners of those patents.
This is a common problem with audio and video codecs which often
involve algorithms which are subject to patent claims.
Tom
On 01/11/2019 10:25, Code Zombie wrote:
I think I am going to switch to the flatpak version. Last time I remember I
used it it had all multimedia support by default. This way I would not have
to fight between rpmfusion and negativo repos.
But, I still don't understand given that ffmpeg is all open-source, what
prevents fedora from includ
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 00:51:47 +, long27km wrote:
> Why isn't there an option to install other repos codecs and impls ( i
> know the technical answer) ? I thought Fedora was now supposed to be
> focused on being developer friendly. Dev's could just install another
> distro of the os that allows
On 01. 11. 19 10:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 11. 19 10:11, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that case
and
On 01. 11. 19 10:11, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that case and
proceed with normal FTBS policy [0] if it
Yeah, looks like mass rebuild just skips these packages:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py#_125
I am wondering if it wouldn't make sense to do a scratch build in that case
and proceed with normal FTBS policy [0] if it fails.
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fe
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> It's been incredible to part of this project and community! :-)
>
> Once upon a time I was an (over?)enthusiastic packager and it's left me
> with ownership of 300+ packages. O_o
Jamie, just wanted to say a big THANKS for all the time
35 matches
Mail list logo
