Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-11-05 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia said:
> Without robust integration with AD, I have no use
> for FreeIPA. And I don't know *anyone* who uses a FreeIPA server.
>
> Perhaps it's time to drop FreeIPA?
Nope. You are assuming the everybody needs AD... lots of people have no
use for AD and just wa
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:46 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it essentially
> > prevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from getting any
> > better. Without people using it, we can't know
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 20:45 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it essentially
> > prevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from getting any
> > better. Without people using it, we can't kn
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> The problem with the Samba team's advice is that it essentially
> prevents the MIT Kerberos AD-DC implementation from getting any
> better. Without people using it, we can't know what needs to be fixed.
> The Red Hat FreeIPA team has been working
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:14:30AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > It would be useful for that contributor to be able to say "I build these
> > packages so I can ship the thing I'm invested in, but... user and other
> > contributors, beware".
> >
> > Now, solving that isn't in the requirements mod
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:10:33PM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Consider the message that comments like this one and your last post
> send. I took the time to thoughtfully put together a set of ideas that
> can solve our problems in an easier and less controversial way by
> learning lessons from ot
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Of course, this seems irrelevant to Fedora -- we're not on the hook to
> Support anything with a capital S, and yet we often do make
> community-based efforts to help with just about any softare. But there is
> a related problem: sometimes, in order to package up some applic
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 14:20 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> It would be useful for that contributor to be able to say "I build
> these
> packages so I can ship the thing I'm invested in, but... user and
> other
> contributors, beware".
> Now, solving that isn't in the requirements modularity, but i
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 14:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> That said, it's hard to read "I see it as a solved problem and I
> don't
> understand why we are trying to solve it again" as ... helpful.
>
Consider the message that comments like this one and your last post
send. I took the time to thou
On 11/4/19 2:18 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:04 pm, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver
Just in case of any possible confusion: this change proposal was never
successfully implemented.
Based on the feedbac
On 11/4/19 2:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
We are not going to implement this directly in glibc. You should talk
to a stub resolver on 127.0.0.1 instead. We do not want to link a
cryptographic library into every process that queries an Internet host
name. That also applies to DNSSEC.
The tran
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:13 AM wrote:
>
> Could you please tell us if the post is published yet? And if so, could
> you please share the link?
>
It is not. It will publish on Thursday. I'll share the link here when
it goes up.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=Ameri
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 9:03 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 11/3/19 11:17 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 2:21 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11/1/19 1:47 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> Flat pack should be doing a requires(post): selin
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 12:04 pm, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver
Just in case of any possible confusion: this change proposal was never
successfully implemented.
___
devel mailing list
* Michael Cronenworth:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any project or team involved with improving encrypted DNS
> support in Fedora? Any movement in Red Hat corporate?
>
> - Glibc team?
> The /etc/resolv.conf file needs some love. AFAIK it still does not
> verify DNSSEC.
We are not going to implement
There will be an outage starting at 2019-11-05 21:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-11-05 21:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be updating and rebooting the various serv
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:07:10AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> * Do we want to support "buildroot-only" packages?
This isn't a specific goal. My understanding is that this is useful to RHEL,
where Red Hat wants to ship supported software that needs software that they
can't support to build. For
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:07:10AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > How do the proposals I've mentioned not fulfill the goals?
> > Are you proposing to _do_ those things, or proposing that someone else
> > oughta?
> I agree with Lukas that this is unfair. As we talked on the Flock,
> that means on
On 04/11/19 10:40 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> IMHO, this should be our number one priority over modules, new
> spins, or whatever paint color the bike shed needs to be today.
> I would like to see DNS over TLS (DoT) with DTLS at the very least.
I may be wrong, but it seems to me the usual
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 11:44, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any project or team involved with improving encrypted DNS support in
> Fedora? Any movement in Red Hat corporate?
>
> - Glibc team?
> The /etc/resolv.conf file needs some love. AFAIK it still does not
> verify DNSSE
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:40:47AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any project or team involved with improving encrypted DNS support
> in Fedora? Any movement in Red Hat corporate?
>
> - Glibc team?
> The /etc/resolv.conf file needs some love. AFAIK it still does not veri
Hi,
Is there any project or team involved with improving encrypted DNS support in
Fedora? Any movement in Red Hat corporate?
- Glibc team?
The /etc/resolv.conf file needs some love. AFAIK it still does not verify
DNSSEC.
- Bind team?
Using 'stunnel' is not a real option.
- DHCP(d & c)
On ma, 04 marras 2019, Dario Lesca wrote:
Too many people (like also me) try to use samba-dc on fedora for deploy
a production AD DC controller, without know that MIT kerberos is
experimental and some useful things cannot work (es. win to win
access).
An recent last example:
https://lists.samba.
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-11-04)
=
Meeting started by mhroncok at 15:01:36 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-11-04/fesco.2019-11-04-15.01.log.html
.
Meeting
On 04. 11. 19 16:23, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 20:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hero maintenance
I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further
e-mails, but
this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766572
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 20:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hero maintenance
>
> I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further
> e-mails, but
> this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. Sorry about
> that.
I disagree t
Back in May I've got all 26478 questions (from all language sections) backed-up
with wget, after removing JS (embedded and standalone files) they take up
~890MiB of disk space.
A few dozen questions with multiple pages of answers have only the first page
with top rated answers saved.
I removed a
Dear all,
the semiannual exercise is upon us. FESCo candidates must submit an
"interview" in which they answer a set of questions (but can also add whatever
they want).
The question whether we should have a new set of questions needs to be answered.
Currently we have the following:
Mandatory Qu
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 03:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > *Requirement*: Users must be able to discover what alternative
> > software
> > versions are available with tools that are shipped with the OS by
> > default.
> > Ideally, these should be the same tools that they are already
> > comfortable
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:36:05PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2019/10/30 0:24:
> >Dear maintainers,
> >here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time) require
> >Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so.
> >If you were bcced on this e-m
Il giorno lun, 04/11/2019 alle 08.38 -0500, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> What defines it as experimental?
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Running_a_Samba_AD_DC_with_MIT_Kerberos_KDC
> Using MIT Kerberos is still considered experimental.
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 30 Workstation)
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 10:48, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last few weeks, I was working on ODCS upgrade in staging. This is done now
> and I would like to do the same upgrade in prod.
>
> The ODCS running in Fedora prod infra is quite old and lot of things
> changed in the upstream. Therefore this
FYI, working on in: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38735037
--
Javi Roman
Twitter: @javiromanrh
GitHub: github.com/javiroman
Linkedin: es.linkedin.com/in/javiroman
Big Data Blog: dataintensive.info
Apache Id: javiroman
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 12:00 PM Javi Roman wrote:
>
> Hi
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:33 AM Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> Too many people (like also me) try to use samba-dc on fedora for deploy
> a production AD DC controller, without know that MIT kerberos is
> experimental and some useful things cannot work (es. win to win
> access).
>
> An recent last example:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2019/10/30 0:24:
Dear maintainers,
here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time) require
Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so.
If you were bcced on this e-mail, it affects one or more of your packages.
mtasaka
comix
(→ PY2
Too many people (like also me) try to use samba-dc on fedora for deploy
a production AD DC controller, without know that MIT kerberos is
experimental and some useful things cannot work (es. win to win
access).
An recent last example:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-November/226845.html
Hi Kevin,
Could we please create an action item list for FESCO ticket?
I guess at the end we don't want to freeze Rawhide but we should have
steps required for the branched Fedora freeze. Do you know how to do
that or could you point someone here please?
Jirka
On Sun, 2019-09-22 at 10:48 +0200,
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 14:29 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 02:09:04PM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > > I guess it will be easier to just think about the branching date
> > > when
> > > Flock schedule is creating.
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 16:22, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > I do not disagree with you on this. I also know we don't have a larger
> > number of system administrators, servers and time to do all the things
> > many community members 'expect a project to have'. We have the
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 13:19:41 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 11. 19 23:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > Hero maintenance
> > >
> > > I don't normally correct my typos on mailing
On 03. 11. 19 23:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hero maintenance
I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further e-mails, but
this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course
Hello everyone,
You are invited to the next NeuroFedora team meeting at 1600UTC on
Tuesday 5th November. You can see the time in your local time zone by
running this command in a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1600 next Tue'
or please use the link below:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldcloc
45 matches
Mail list logo
