No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On 30. 11. 19 2:27, Ivan Chavero wrote:
Yes i'm going to update it to the newest version this weekend
Thanks.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
Am 30.11.19 um 01:42 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> I'm not really sure what you want to say here. There's a pretty strict
>> policy about what changes provenpackagers are "allowed" to make to
>> "foreign" packages, and it doesn't include pushing minor improvements.
>
> Well, in
Am 30.11.19 um 07:27 schrieb Chris Adams:
> I think the problem is that unmaintained packages are still
> unmaintained; drive-by changes by provenpackagers are not actual
> maintenance, because that's not a scalable organization (expecting
> provenpackagers to do all maintenance on random packages
On November 30, 2019 11:46:46 AM GMT+01:00, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
>Am 30.11.19 um 07:27 schrieb Chris Adams:
>> I think the problem is that unmaintained packages are still
>> unmaintained; drive-by changes by provenpackagers are not actual
>> maintenance, because that's not a scalable organiza
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
them synced?
Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system shouldn't have been
commissioned into production before it reached feature
Hey Igor,
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:00, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello fellows,
>
> After last publication on LWN about Fedora Modularity mess, I think it
> is time to describe the idea I was proposing internally with few other
> folks (Adam Samalik, Brian Exelbierd) back in the RH times.
>
> Bef
Hi, Miro.
On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 13:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello fellow Python packagers. This is an announcement about a new set
> of RPM macros you can use to build PEP 517/518 enabled packages, that
> is Python packages that have the pyproject.toml file.
Thanks for your (and whoever
On 30. 11. 19 17:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
1. It actually generates more BRs than I specify manually (I had 3). It
adds python3-wheel and it brings in python3-pip and python3-pytoml on it
own, so my package ends up with 4 additional BRs for no apparent gain.
python3-pytoml or py
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 30. 11. 19 17:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > 1. It actually generates more BRs than I specify manually (I had 3). It
> > adds python3-wheel and it brings in python3-pip and python3-pytoml on it
> > own, so my package ends u
On 30. 11. 19 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:49 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 11. 19 17:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
1. It actually generates more BRs than I specify manually (I had 3). It
adds python3-wheel and it brings in python3-pip and python3-pytoml on
Le samedi 30 novembre 2019 à 12:54 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:49 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> > On 30. 11. 19 17:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > >
> > > 2. It would be useful if it generated the file list
> > > automatically, too.
> > > I had to drop .egg
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:43:48PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > I'd love to explore using Btrfs for doing it. I have no idea how to
> > get started with that...
>
> Before Btrfs specific, I'd ask how much compression configurab
Hi,
following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact jhogarth (James Hogarth).
James, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
python-pyrfc3339 did not get an update to 1.1. Release monitoring filed
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:28:34AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Matej Grabovsky said:
> > Can you please explain what you mean? What are the alternatives if
> > there really are over 5000 packages in CTAN?
>
> Why does all of CTAN need to go into one source RPM?
Actually it's no
PS: forgot to add the link to my bug report as required by the policy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774667
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 01:42:04AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I'm not really sure what you want to say here. There's a pretty strict
> > policy about what changes provenpackagers are "allowed" to make to
> > "foreign" packages, and it doesn't include pushing minor impro
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:25:08PM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
> them synced?
>
> Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system s
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> As a meta-goal, we should break up "Modularity" into a number of
> separate components, some build-side, some client-side. Modularity
> suffers greatly from trying to encode everything into one document.
> This greatly r
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 3:00 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:25:08PM +, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
> > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
> > th
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:43:48PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> ...snip...
> > >
> > > I'd love to explore using Btrfs for doing it. I have no idea how to
> > > get started with that...
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:59 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello fellows,
>
> After last publication on LWN about Fedora Modularity mess, I think it
> is time to describe the idea I was proposing internally with few other
> folks (Adam Samalik, Brian Exelbierd) back in the RH times.
>
> Before I ac
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:26:14PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi, Miro.
>
> On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 13:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello fellow Python packagers. This is an announcement about a new set
> > of RPM macros you can use to build PEP 517/518 enabled packages, t
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:20:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:43:48PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > ...snip...
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to explore usi
Felix Schwarz writes:
>
> - package testing
>Manually checking updates-testing is too tedious and usually I don't want
>to install everything in updates-testing right away. But there are some
>packages which I like to get as fast as possible/which I can test easily.
>
>- So I woul
25 matches
Mail list logo
