Le 2019-12-02 07:47, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
Hi Neal,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:58 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
I think we need to recognize that we've done some poor optimization
for the majority of packager workflows. Even if we consider modules,
the vast majority of components will never be
Le 2019-12-02 08:17, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
I simply can't. If somebody gets a package into repo just because he
wants to build foo, it is probably not very reasonable to ask them to
"properly" maintain it.
It is very reasonable to expect anyone building in Fedora, reusing the
work of
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:28 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le 2019-12-02 07:23, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:23 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Le mardi 26 novembre 2019 à 16:58 +0100, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
>
> >> > And we can't actually
> >>
Hey all,
Jakub recently finished movement of copr builders from Fedora 30 to Fedora
F31. At this moment we are not aware of any serious issues related to
this change, but please let us know if you noticed anything.
With a great help of fedora infra (Kevin) we were able to add a new set of
Le 2019-12-02 07:23, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:23 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
Le mardi 26 novembre 2019 à 16:58 +0100, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
> And we can't actually
> have multiple versions of a package with same name (without "mangled"
> names) in a repo
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:43 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > 1. Do we want to package multiple streams only for "leaf" software or
> > any kind of it?
> > I believe that we need both, and we do support both. However, it might
> > not look as nice as it could:
> > *
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi Neal,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:58 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:59 AM Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello fellows,
> >
> > After last publication on LWN about Fedora Modularity mess, I think it
> > is time to describe the idea I was proposing internally with few
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778598
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778598
Bug ID: 1778598
Summary: perl-Clipboard-0.21 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Clipboard
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hey Michal,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 5:08 PM clime wrote:
>
> Hey Igor,
>
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:00, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello fellows,
> >
> > After last publication on LWN about Fedora Modularity mess, I think it
> > is time to describe the idea I was proposing internally with
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:23 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le mardi 26 novembre 2019 à 16:58 +0100, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
>
> Hi, Igor
>
>
> > And we can't actually
> > have multiple versions of a package with same name (without "mangled"
> > names) in a repo due to the way how our
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 6:35 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> As a meta-goal, we should break up "Modularity" into a number of
> separate components, some build-side, some client-side. Modularity
> suffers greatly from trying to encode everything into one document.
> This greatly raises
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 9:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > As a meta-goal, we should break up "Modularity" into a number of
> > separate components, some build-side, some client-side. Modularity
> > suffers greatly from
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.4-20191202git94354d8.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> 1. Do we want to package multiple streams only for "leaf" software or
> any kind of it?
> I believe that we need both, and we do support both. However, it might
> not look as nice as it could:
> * Need to create multiple repos for different "streams"
> * Need to maintain
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191130.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191201.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772875
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with
a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt.
I tested it all in copr and most of the packages are rebuilding except
for the following packages:
* dynafed - compile error:
In file included from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742913
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742913
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|biber-2.13 is available |biber-2.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
> I think the next step is to open a Package Review request on bugzilla,
> including a new spec file - is that right?
In the time it took me to write this introduction, I've already had a very
speed response on Pagure to confirm that's what I need to do. I'll post further
updates on the Pagure
Hi,
I'm a long-time user of Fedora, but have yet to contribute. My experience
is as a software engineer, and I have a couple of small previous open
source contributions (here's[1] my github) - hopefully this will be my
first to Fedora.
I'd like to take over maintaining the package for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1744700
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1778465
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1778465
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1761850, 1778463, 1778382
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761850
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1778465
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Bug ID: 1778465
Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Entropy
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Entropy
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463
Bug ID: 1778463
Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Float
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Float
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191129.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191130.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 91
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.55 MiB
Size of dropped packages:
On Sunday, 01 December 2019 at 00:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:26:14PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
[...]
> > Two observations:
> >
> > 1. It actually generates more BRs than I specify manually (I had 3). It
> > adds python3-wheel and it
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776561
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777071
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
42 matches
Mail list logo
