On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:42:47PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2019/12/06 19:22:
> >On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:23PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> >>Hi Richard,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:56 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>>Just built coq in a side tag
Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2019/12/06 19:22:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:23PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:56 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Just built coq in a side tag for OCaml 4.09. However it
can't install for the next build:
DEBUG util.py:596:
Le jeudi 05 décembre 2019 à 16:42 -0700, John M. Harris Jr a écrit :
>
> Why in the world was Docker removed? Docker is the most popular
> container
> technology, so if we must embrace the "container" systems, why not
> include the most popular in Fedora?
Because moby (née docker) is a
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:23PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:56 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > Just built coq in a side tag for OCaml 4.09. However it
> > can't install for the next build:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:596: Error:
> > DEBUG util.py:596:
On Friday, 06 December 2019 at 10:57, Petr Pisar wrote:
[...]
> Maybe DNF could support setting a prefered mirror while still checking
> for the latest metadata because in my experience the automatic mirror
> selection does not always provide the best performance. (E.g. when
> I connected an IPv6
On 2019-12-06, Johannes Lips wrote:
> It really depends which mirrors you are using and if you are unlucky
> the updates get pushed to stable, before it reaches updates-testing
> for you and then again there's nothing to add, once it's pushed.
>
If you use metalink in your repository
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191206.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 2019-12-05, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> --===6343409591866461936==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3a3ad80598f34f04"
>
> --3a3ad80598f34f04
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:51:40AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 07:35 Johannes Lips <[1]johannes.l...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between
> texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 08:46 Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 06/12/19 07:34, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between
> texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important,
Hi,
following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact moezroy (Moez Roy).
Moez, if you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
There several open bugs without response [1], including bug 1762083 [2] where
a
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/#_cc_applications
says that I need to patch application (if it does not have config
file) to use "PROFILE=SYSTEM" as the argument to the cipher list.
However, when I was looking into the library which uses this function
On Do, 05.12.19 16:33, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote:
> > Locking down the OS itself and locking down the user's home are two
> > different things, because OS integrity should be bound to different
> > mechanisms than user data encryption. (i.e. OS integrity should be
> > bound
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
