https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786878
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
ack-3.3.0-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39968362
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786808
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.28 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.29 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786878
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1648279
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1648279=edit
[patch] Update to 3.3.0 (#1786878)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786878
Bug ID: 1786878
Summary: ack-3.3.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: ack
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
The "Rebuild (tesseract)" , pushed opencv-4.1.2-3.fc32 to rawhide
which is one soname bump , the build should failed on i686 but don't .
I have to review the latest commits ...
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 8:00 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change will toggle the default firewalld backend from iptables to
> > nftables. All
Hello,
Can somebody help me with some reviews, the first two
being more urgent than others. I can swap with anything
in exchange.
Happy holidays,
Robert-André
1786858[1]
_Review Request: golang-rsc-binaryregexp - Go regexp for binary/latin-1 data _
1786857[2]
_Review Request:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/firewalld_default_to_nftables
>
> == Summary ==
> This change will toggle the default firewalld backend from iptables to
> nftables. All of firewalld's primitives will use nftables while direct
> rules
Sorry, no problem.I was referring to the following:
"The egg metadata state that the current version is a 1.0.0 release candidate,
so the 0.x versioning is correct."
But I guess that it is perhaps fine now.
Thanks!
On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 9:31:47 AM EST, Alexander Ploumistos
You are welcome. Sorry for the HTML, I am away from home.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 15:12 Globe Trotter via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Thanks! There was an issue with koji and me. Now the update has been built
> and submitted for testing. Should I fix the egg issue? How.
>
Thanks! There was an issue with koji and me. Now the update has been built and
submitted for testing. Should I fix the egg issue? How.Thanks!
On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 3:34:30 AM EST, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 4:27 AM Frank Crawford wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I did a new build to add sysusage to EPEL8 the other day, and pushed it to
> bodhi, and today received the following message:
>
> bodhi - 2019-12-27 20:13:12.706366 (karma: 0)
> FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e249fc2a74 ejected from the push
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> Any further suggestion/help? Here is the updated spec file:
>
> $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
> Uploading (5.0KiB)...
> https://paste.centos.org/view/3a4fe4d6
>
Oh, there's also a problem with your changelog entries, the last three
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> Thanks! This seems to compile again, but I can't tell what happened with koji:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39956986
Besides koji misbehaving in general in the last few days, you have
uploaded an older
14 matches
Mail list logo
