No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
25 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 99/169 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800830
Bug ID: 1800830
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.069 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20200207.n.2. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788965
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.fc32|perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.fc32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794960
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-perlfaq-5.20200125-1.f |perl-perlfaq-5.20200125-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794560
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-lib-abs-0.95-1.fc32|perl-lib-abs-0.95-1.fc32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.fc32|perl-lib-abs-0.94-2.fc32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794960
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:19 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > I'm not sure where to report such an RFE. Is
> > https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git right?
>
> yep. Exactly the right place.
Thanks, I opened
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:46:26PM -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:48 AM Lubomír Sedlář
> wrote:
> > It seems you accidentally uploaded the source RPM instead of the
> > tarball. Simply run fedpkg new-sources on the correct file and push the
> > new sources file. The build
Hi,
I'd like to unretire unshield.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unshield/
This is a dependency of openmw (maintained by me in RPM Fusion).
The package was retired on 12/17, which was just under eight weeks
ago-- so I think a re-review is not necessary.
Releng ticket:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Thats... much more harsh than I would agree with. I still use it and
> find some of its information helpfull.
Sadly it does seem to have got a lot worse recently... I noticed last
weekend that a few of the packages I maintain (e.g. clide,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:48 AM Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
> It seems you accidentally uploaded the source RPM instead of the
> tarball. Simply run fedpkg new-sources on the correct file and push the
> new sources file. The build should then work.
Can we have a blacklist on the dist-git lookaside
On 07. 02. 20 15:44, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Hey all, I'm pleased to announce that a new major release of mock tool,
A 'simple' chroot build environment manager for building RPMs, is out.
There are several major changes, namely `--bootstrap-chroot` enabled by
default, default flip from `yum` to
On 07. 02. 20 15:30, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I'd like to ask for your input about this service. Is it worth keeping? Is it
duplicating what the CI pipeline does?
Is someone interested in working on it?
It's worth keeping. It's absolutely the best thing and when it doesn't work for
a while,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788965
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hi all.
Do you know why `devtoolset-8*` packages are missing on epel7-ppc64le?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41425383
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84
GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/
\o Hey Jared,
I recently tried looking for the Babel compiler in Fedora, and
stumbled upon the packaged version, nodejs-babel-runtime. However,
it isn't installable:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides (npm(regenerator-runtime) >= 0.10.0 with
npm(regenerator-runtime) <
Top post to say many thanks to all for the help / debug tips.
I am all good now, just needed to import the right `source`
I now have this documented for future prosperity!
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 02. 20 11:20, Luke Hinds wrote:
> > When I perform 'fedpkg
On 02/07/2020 06:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to
> every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the
> package
> with the proposed changes merged, and report the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800620
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800621
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 09:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:37:05AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:09:37PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hey all, I'm pleased to announce that a new major release of mock tool,
A 'simple' chroot build environment manager for building RPMs, is out.
There are several major changes, namely `--bootstrap-chroot` enabled by
default, default flip from `yum` to `dnf`, simplified mock-core-configs
package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800622
Bug ID: 1800622
Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mail-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800622
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800621
Bug ID: 1800621
Summary: Request to package perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict into EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PerlIO-utf8_strict
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800620
Bug ID: 1800620
Summary: Request to package perl-Import-Into into EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Import-Into
Assignee:
On 2/7/20 9:30 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to
> every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the
> package
> with the proposed changes merged, and report the outcome
Good Morning Everyone,
I while back I wrote a small service named simple-koji-ci, which reacts to
every pull-request opened on dist-git and fires a (scratch) build of the package
with the proposed changes merged, and report the outcome as a "flag" to the
pull-request.
This is a very simple
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:37:05AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:09:37PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd strongly suggest you look at supermin before going any further.
> >
> >
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:09:37PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > I'd strongly suggest you look at supermin before going any further.
>
> Supermin is an interesting project, but at this point we're not
> looking for a
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:09:37PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'd strongly suggest you look at supermin before going any further.
Supermin is an interesting project, but at this point we're not
looking for a tool to craft the image. We're still at an earlier stage
of changing how we do
Dne 07. 02. 20 v 13:47 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:00 AM Daniel Mach wrote >> Dne 06.
02. 20 v 19:54 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
- move the Requires:linux-firmware (or change to Recommends) from kernel-core,
have kernel Requires:linux-firmware
It would be
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 03:32, Michal Konecny wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2020 22:13, Till Maas wrote:
> As a package maintainer, I can easily request commit/admin access for
> >a specific branch or dist-git repo.
> I add one more requirement based on my own workflow:
> - As fedora user, I want to
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:00 AM Daniel Mach wrote:
>
>
>
> Dne 06. 02. 20 v 19:54 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers,
> >
> > I'm looking into the split of kernel packages. The split into subpackages
> > seems interesting, but there are
I'd strongly suggest you look at supermin before going any further.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with
On 07. 02. 20 11:20, Luke Hinds wrote:
When I perform 'fedpkg mockbuild' everything passes, yet 'fedpkg build' results
in a build failure from not being able to find the tarball...
Hello Luke. Others have already identified the cause, so let me just share a tip
about how to debug such issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800525
Bug ID: 1800525
Summary: perl-SVG-TT-Graph-1.04 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SVG-TT-Graph
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dne 07. 02. 20 v 11:48 Lubomír Sedlář napsal(a):
> Luke Hinds píše v Pá 07. 02. 2020 v 10:20 +:
>> Hopefully the correct list, if not apologies.
>>
>> Just updated a package I am newly maintaining, commit diff here:
>>
>>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:08:58AM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_parallel_make
> and
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#ExtUtils::MakeMaker
>
> and I'd like to clean up some confusion I have. The
>
>
Luke Hinds píše v Pá 07. 02. 2020 v 10:20 +:
> Hopefully the correct list, if not apologies.
>
> Just updated a package I am newly maintaining, commit diff here:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keylime/c/563905a7b29096c0fecba1d4279e901c1acb95c5?branch=master
>
> When I perform
This is the error which I get:
~~~
$ fedpkg co keylime
Cloning into 'keylime'...
remote: Counting objects: 16, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (12/12), done.
remote: Total 16 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0)
Receiving objects: 100% (16/16), done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (2/2), done.
$ cd
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hopefully the correct list, if not apologies.
Just updated a package I am newly maintaining, commit diff here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keylime/c/563905a7b29096c0fecba1d4279e901c1acb95c5?branch=master
When I perform 'fedpkg mockbuild' everything passes, yet 'fedpkg build'
results in a
Dne 06. 02. 20 v 19:54 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Hello kernel maintainers, hello Fedora developers,
I'm looking into the split of kernel packages. The split into subpackages
seems interesting, but there are many dependencies between the packages,
so it is usual to end up with all
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:25 AM Ernestas Kulik wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 07:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > What does it mean "us? I see that ABRT has broken dependencies in
> > rawhide. I would appreciate if you could use side tag to build new
> > version + rebuild all packages which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788965
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On 06/02/2020 22:13, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:34:37PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote:
On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a
recent blog post which you may be impacted by:
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/
We
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800469
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
58 matches
Mail list logo
