Hello,
I am orphaning java packages due to lack of time and expertise to maintain them.
The packages are quite simple and shouldn't pose big problems to Java experts,
as they are also quite established and stable i.e. slow-moving. The current
versions in Fedora are from a few years ago, and it mi
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708
| Result
| GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706)
I already started "fedpkg build", but it said
...
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
so i interrupted it and restarted "fedpkg build"
What to do ?
s
Till Maas wrote:
> All CAs support verification via insecure protocols AFAIK because
> usually the certificate is needed to secure the protocol.
If you mean CAs who issue server certificates for use in HTTPS, and who
serve the general public, then that's probably true, but then we're not
talking a
Greetings.
I was (probibly poorly) maintaining tinymce for a while because we used
it for askbot. We no longer do need it so I am going to orphan it and
hope someone out there has more time and energy to give it the love it
needs.
There's currently some CVE's filed against it.
It's on versuon
On 2/15/20 5:10 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Would you mind submitting builds for F30? Some people (me) are still on
> F30...
Sure! It wasn't building on F30 for some reason but I am looking at some
other Golang packages that are not building on F30 too so I will look
into it.
Joe
--
Joe Doss
j.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:19 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> The last rawhide update for symmetrica bumped an SONAME from
> "libsymmetrica.so.0()(64bit)" to "libsymmetrica.so.2()(64bit)". At
> least one package is impacted and needs to be rebuilt (sagemath).
Oh, sorry, I forgot about the email announ
And now I am getting gpg key mismatches.
Should I just wait it out and keep resubmitting builds until they succeed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Hello,
I am trying to build a package in copr, but rawhide builds for
aarch64, ppc64le and x86_64 fail with the following message in
root.log:
DEBUG util.py:689: Executing command: ['btrfs', 'subv', 'list',
'/var/lib/mock'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh',
'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOS
Hi everybody,
The last rawhide update for symmetrica bumped an SONAME from
"libsymmetrica.so.0()(64bit)" to "libsymmetrica.so.2()(64bit)". At
least one package is impacted and needs to be rebuilt (sagemath).
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
On 2/14/20 7:36 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
> On 2/14/20 10:23 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
>> On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> Anyone working on packaging github's CLI?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/cli/cli
>>>
>>> I've never packaged a GO application before...
>>
>> I have a spec I am working on right
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
12 matches
Mail list logo