Fedora-Cloud-30-20200215.0 compose check report

2020-02-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200215.0 compose check report

2020-02-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Packaging of github cli?

2020-02-15 Thread Till Hofmann
On 2/14/20 7:36 PM, Joe Doss wrote: > On 2/14/20 10:23 AM, Joe Doss wrote: >> On 2/14/20 9:56 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> Anyone working on packaging github's CLI? >>> >>> https://github.com/cli/cli  >>> >>> I've never packaged a GO application before... >> >> I have a spec I am working on right

Unannounced SONAME bump in (lib)symmetrica

2020-02-15 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, The last rawhide update for symmetrica bumped an SONAME from "libsymmetrica.so.0()(64bit)" to "libsymmetrica.so.2()(64bit)". At least one package is impacted and needs to be rebuilt (sagemath). Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f

copr builds for rawhide 64-bit arches failing

2020-02-15 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, I am trying to build a package in copr, but rawhide builds for aarch64, ppc64le and x86_64 fail with the following message in root.log: DEBUG util.py:689: Executing command: ['btrfs', 'subv', 'list', '/var/lib/mock'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOS

Re: copr builds for rawhide 64-bit arches failing

2020-02-15 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
And now I am getting gpg key mismatches. Should I just wait it out and keep resubmitting builds until they succeed? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in (lib)symmetrica

2020-02-15 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:19 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > The last rawhide update for symmetrica bumped an SONAME from > "libsymmetrica.so.0()(64bit)" to "libsymmetrica.so.2()(64bit)". At > least one package is impacted and needs to be rebuilt (sagemath). Oh, sorry, I forgot about the email announ

Re: Packaging of github cli?

2020-02-15 Thread Joe Doss
On 2/15/20 5:10 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Would you mind submitting builds for F30? Some people (me) are still on > F30... Sure! It wasn't building on F30 for some reason but I am looking at some other Golang packages that are not building on F30 too so I will look into it. Joe -- Joe Doss j.

Orphaning tinymce

2020-02-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. I was (probibly poorly) maintaining tinymce for a while because we used it for askbot. We no longer do need it so I am going to orphan it and hope someone out there has more time and energy to give it the love it needs. There's currently some CVE's filed against it. It's on versuon

CAs and verification security (was: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org)

2020-02-15 Thread Björn Persson
Till Maas wrote: > All CAs support verification via insecure protocols AFAIK because > usually the certificate is needed to secure the protocol. If you mean CAs who issue server certificates for use in HTTPS, and who serve the general public, then that's probably true, but then we're not talking a

Why does "fedpkg build" failed for wdune ?

2020-02-15 Thread J. Scheurich
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41519708 | Result | GenericError: Build already in progress (task 41519706) I already started "fedpkg build", but it said ... Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... so i interrupted it and restarted "fedpkg build" What to do ? s

Orphaning java packages, looking for maintainers

2020-02-15 Thread Susi Lehtola
Hello, I am orphaning java packages due to lack of time and expertise to maintain them. The packages are quite simple and shouldn't pose big problems to Java experts, as they are also quite established and stable i.e. slow-moving. The current versions in Fedora are from a few years ago, and it mi